Cargando…

Evaluation of current Australian health service accreditation processes (ACCREDIT-CAP): protocol for a mixed-method research project

INTRODUCTION: Accreditation programmes aim to improve the quality and safety of health services, and have been widely implemented. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the outcomes of existing programmes. The Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hinchcliff, Reece, Greenfield, David, Moldovan, Max, Pawsey, Marjorie, Mumford, Virginia, Westbrook, Johanna Irene, Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3449274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22864419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001726
_version_ 1782244330409295872
author Hinchcliff, Reece
Greenfield, David
Moldovan, Max
Pawsey, Marjorie
Mumford, Virginia
Westbrook, Johanna Irene
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_facet Hinchcliff, Reece
Greenfield, David
Moldovan, Max
Pawsey, Marjorie
Mumford, Virginia
Westbrook, Johanna Irene
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_sort Hinchcliff, Reece
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Accreditation programmes aim to improve the quality and safety of health services, and have been widely implemented. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the outcomes of existing programmes. The Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork-Current Accreditation Processes (ACCREDIT-CAP) project is designed to address key gaps in the literature by evaluating the current processes of three accreditation programmes used across Australian acute, primary and aged care services. METHODS AND DESIGN: The project comprises three mixed-method studies involving documentary analyses, surveys, focus groups and individual interviews. Study samples will comprise stakeholders from across the Australian healthcare system: accreditation agencies; federal and state government departments; consumer advocates; professional colleges and associations; and staff of acute, primary and aged care services. Sample sizes have been determined to ensure results allow robust conclusions. Qualitative information will be thematically analysed, supported by the use of textual grouping software. Quantitative data will be subjected to a variety of analytical procedures, including descriptive and comparative statistics. The results are designed to inform health system policy and planning decisions in Australia and internationally. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project has been approved by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number HREC 10274). Results will be reported to partner organisations, healthcare consumers and other stakeholders via peer-reviewed publications, conference and seminar presentations, and a publicly accessible website.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3449274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34492742012-10-04 Evaluation of current Australian health service accreditation processes (ACCREDIT-CAP): protocol for a mixed-method research project Hinchcliff, Reece Greenfield, David Moldovan, Max Pawsey, Marjorie Mumford, Virginia Westbrook, Johanna Irene Braithwaite, Jeffrey BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Accreditation programmes aim to improve the quality and safety of health services, and have been widely implemented. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the outcomes of existing programmes. The Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork-Current Accreditation Processes (ACCREDIT-CAP) project is designed to address key gaps in the literature by evaluating the current processes of three accreditation programmes used across Australian acute, primary and aged care services. METHODS AND DESIGN: The project comprises three mixed-method studies involving documentary analyses, surveys, focus groups and individual interviews. Study samples will comprise stakeholders from across the Australian healthcare system: accreditation agencies; federal and state government departments; consumer advocates; professional colleges and associations; and staff of acute, primary and aged care services. Sample sizes have been determined to ensure results allow robust conclusions. Qualitative information will be thematically analysed, supported by the use of textual grouping software. Quantitative data will be subjected to a variety of analytical procedures, including descriptive and comparative statistics. The results are designed to inform health system policy and planning decisions in Australia and internationally. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project has been approved by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number HREC 10274). Results will be reported to partner organisations, healthcare consumers and other stakeholders via peer-reviewed publications, conference and seminar presentations, and a publicly accessible website. BMJ Group 2012-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3449274/ /pubmed/22864419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001726 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Hinchcliff, Reece
Greenfield, David
Moldovan, Max
Pawsey, Marjorie
Mumford, Virginia
Westbrook, Johanna Irene
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Evaluation of current Australian health service accreditation processes (ACCREDIT-CAP): protocol for a mixed-method research project
title Evaluation of current Australian health service accreditation processes (ACCREDIT-CAP): protocol for a mixed-method research project
title_full Evaluation of current Australian health service accreditation processes (ACCREDIT-CAP): protocol for a mixed-method research project
title_fullStr Evaluation of current Australian health service accreditation processes (ACCREDIT-CAP): protocol for a mixed-method research project
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of current Australian health service accreditation processes (ACCREDIT-CAP): protocol for a mixed-method research project
title_short Evaluation of current Australian health service accreditation processes (ACCREDIT-CAP): protocol for a mixed-method research project
title_sort evaluation of current australian health service accreditation processes (accredit-cap): protocol for a mixed-method research project
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3449274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22864419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001726
work_keys_str_mv AT hinchcliffreece evaluationofcurrentaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprocessesaccreditcapprotocolforamixedmethodresearchproject
AT greenfielddavid evaluationofcurrentaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprocessesaccreditcapprotocolforamixedmethodresearchproject
AT moldovanmax evaluationofcurrentaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprocessesaccreditcapprotocolforamixedmethodresearchproject
AT pawseymarjorie evaluationofcurrentaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprocessesaccreditcapprotocolforamixedmethodresearchproject
AT mumfordvirginia evaluationofcurrentaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprocessesaccreditcapprotocolforamixedmethodresearchproject
AT westbrookjohannairene evaluationofcurrentaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprocessesaccreditcapprotocolforamixedmethodresearchproject
AT braithwaitejeffrey evaluationofcurrentaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprocessesaccreditcapprotocolforamixedmethodresearchproject