Cargando…

A comparison of preference for and efficacy of tablet formulations of sumatriptan (50 mg and 100 mg), naratriptan (2.5 mg), rizatriptan (10 mg), and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine

This randomized, multicenter, open-label, five-way crossover study was conducted to assess patients’ preference for tablet formulations of sumatriptan (50 mg and 100 mg), naratriptan (2.5 mg), rizatriptan (10 mg), and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine and to identify determina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dahlöf, Carl, Jones, Martin, Davis, Kim, Loftus, Jane, Salonen, Reijo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3451626/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-004-0079-4
_version_ 1782244372217069568
author Dahlöf, Carl
Jones, Martin
Davis, Kim
Loftus, Jane
Salonen, Reijo
author_facet Dahlöf, Carl
Jones, Martin
Davis, Kim
Loftus, Jane
Salonen, Reijo
author_sort Dahlöf, Carl
collection PubMed
description This randomized, multicenter, open-label, five-way crossover study was conducted to assess patients’ preference for tablet formulations of sumatriptan (50 mg and 100 mg), naratriptan (2.5 mg), rizatriptan (10 mg), and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine and to identify determinants of preference. Patients treated one mild, moderate, or severe migraine with each triptan. The results show that sumatriptan 100 mg was significantly preferred over the random preference rate of 20% (p<0.001) whereas sumatriptan 50 mg, naratriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan were not. Patients’ primary reason for preferring a medication was best relief of migraine pain, and the treatment that patients preferred corresponded to the medication that was most likely to confer for them a pain-free response 2 hours postdose. Across all patients, efficacy 2 hours postdose was comparable among triptans with the exception of naratriptan, which was slightly less effective than the other medications (pain-free response 2 hours postdose: 40% sumatriptan 100 mg, 37% sumatriptan 50 mg, 28% naratriptan 2.5 mg, 38% rizatriptan 10 mg, 36% zolmitriptan 2.5 mg). The medications were also similarly well-tolerated. These data demonstrate that information on patients’ medication preference supplements and does not duplicate data from traditional efficacy measures. Patient preference data are useful in tailoring migraine therapy to the needs of the individual patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3451626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34516262012-11-29 A comparison of preference for and efficacy of tablet formulations of sumatriptan (50 mg and 100 mg), naratriptan (2.5 mg), rizatriptan (10 mg), and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine Dahlöf, Carl Jones, Martin Davis, Kim Loftus, Jane Salonen, Reijo J Headache Pain Original This randomized, multicenter, open-label, five-way crossover study was conducted to assess patients’ preference for tablet formulations of sumatriptan (50 mg and 100 mg), naratriptan (2.5 mg), rizatriptan (10 mg), and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine and to identify determinants of preference. Patients treated one mild, moderate, or severe migraine with each triptan. The results show that sumatriptan 100 mg was significantly preferred over the random preference rate of 20% (p<0.001) whereas sumatriptan 50 mg, naratriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan were not. Patients’ primary reason for preferring a medication was best relief of migraine pain, and the treatment that patients preferred corresponded to the medication that was most likely to confer for them a pain-free response 2 hours postdose. Across all patients, efficacy 2 hours postdose was comparable among triptans with the exception of naratriptan, which was slightly less effective than the other medications (pain-free response 2 hours postdose: 40% sumatriptan 100 mg, 37% sumatriptan 50 mg, 28% naratriptan 2.5 mg, 38% rizatriptan 10 mg, 36% zolmitriptan 2.5 mg). The medications were also similarly well-tolerated. These data demonstrate that information on patients’ medication preference supplements and does not duplicate data from traditional efficacy measures. Patient preference data are useful in tailoring migraine therapy to the needs of the individual patient. Springer-Verlag 2004-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3451626/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-004-0079-4 Text en © Springer-Verlag Italia 2004
spellingShingle Original
Dahlöf, Carl
Jones, Martin
Davis, Kim
Loftus, Jane
Salonen, Reijo
A comparison of preference for and efficacy of tablet formulations of sumatriptan (50 mg and 100 mg), naratriptan (2.5 mg), rizatriptan (10 mg), and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine
title A comparison of preference for and efficacy of tablet formulations of sumatriptan (50 mg and 100 mg), naratriptan (2.5 mg), rizatriptan (10 mg), and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine
title_full A comparison of preference for and efficacy of tablet formulations of sumatriptan (50 mg and 100 mg), naratriptan (2.5 mg), rizatriptan (10 mg), and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine
title_fullStr A comparison of preference for and efficacy of tablet formulations of sumatriptan (50 mg and 100 mg), naratriptan (2.5 mg), rizatriptan (10 mg), and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of preference for and efficacy of tablet formulations of sumatriptan (50 mg and 100 mg), naratriptan (2.5 mg), rizatriptan (10 mg), and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine
title_short A comparison of preference for and efficacy of tablet formulations of sumatriptan (50 mg and 100 mg), naratriptan (2.5 mg), rizatriptan (10 mg), and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine
title_sort comparison of preference for and efficacy of tablet formulations of sumatriptan (50 mg and 100 mg), naratriptan (2.5 mg), rizatriptan (10 mg), and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3451626/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-004-0079-4
work_keys_str_mv AT dahlofcarl acomparisonofpreferenceforandefficacyoftabletformulationsofsumatriptan50mgand100mgnaratriptan25mgrizatriptan10mgandzolmitriptan25mgintheacutetreatmentofmigraine
AT jonesmartin acomparisonofpreferenceforandefficacyoftabletformulationsofsumatriptan50mgand100mgnaratriptan25mgrizatriptan10mgandzolmitriptan25mgintheacutetreatmentofmigraine
AT daviskim acomparisonofpreferenceforandefficacyoftabletformulationsofsumatriptan50mgand100mgnaratriptan25mgrizatriptan10mgandzolmitriptan25mgintheacutetreatmentofmigraine
AT loftusjane acomparisonofpreferenceforandefficacyoftabletformulationsofsumatriptan50mgand100mgnaratriptan25mgrizatriptan10mgandzolmitriptan25mgintheacutetreatmentofmigraine
AT salonenreijo acomparisonofpreferenceforandefficacyoftabletformulationsofsumatriptan50mgand100mgnaratriptan25mgrizatriptan10mgandzolmitriptan25mgintheacutetreatmentofmigraine
AT dahlofcarl comparisonofpreferenceforandefficacyoftabletformulationsofsumatriptan50mgand100mgnaratriptan25mgrizatriptan10mgandzolmitriptan25mgintheacutetreatmentofmigraine
AT jonesmartin comparisonofpreferenceforandefficacyoftabletformulationsofsumatriptan50mgand100mgnaratriptan25mgrizatriptan10mgandzolmitriptan25mgintheacutetreatmentofmigraine
AT daviskim comparisonofpreferenceforandefficacyoftabletformulationsofsumatriptan50mgand100mgnaratriptan25mgrizatriptan10mgandzolmitriptan25mgintheacutetreatmentofmigraine
AT loftusjane comparisonofpreferenceforandefficacyoftabletformulationsofsumatriptan50mgand100mgnaratriptan25mgrizatriptan10mgandzolmitriptan25mgintheacutetreatmentofmigraine
AT salonenreijo comparisonofpreferenceforandefficacyoftabletformulationsofsumatriptan50mgand100mgnaratriptan25mgrizatriptan10mgandzolmitriptan25mgintheacutetreatmentofmigraine