Cargando…
Meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints?
Clinical outcomes of migraine treatment are generally based on two major endpoints: acute pain resolution and effects on quality of life (QOL). Resolution of acute pain can be evaluated in a number of ways, each increasingly challenging to achieve; pain relief, pain freedom at 2 h, sustained pain-fr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3451945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18607535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-008-0052-8 |
_version_ | 1782244407061250048 |
---|---|
author | Antonaci, Fabio Sances, Grazia Guaschino, Elena De Cillis, Ilaria Bono, Giorgio Nappi, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Antonaci, Fabio Sances, Grazia Guaschino, Elena De Cillis, Ilaria Bono, Giorgio Nappi, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Antonaci, Fabio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical outcomes of migraine treatment are generally based on two major endpoints: acute pain resolution and effects on quality of life (QOL). Resolution of acute pain can be evaluated in a number of ways, each increasingly challenging to achieve; pain relief, pain freedom at 2 h, sustained pain-freedom, and SPF plus no adverse events (SNAE, the most challenging). QOL questionnaires help assess the burden of migraine and identify optimal treatments. Pain resolution and improved QOL form the basis of the ultimate target—meeting patient expectations, to achieve patient satisfaction. To achieve this, it is crucial to choose appropriate endpoints that reflect realistic treatment goals for individual patients. Moreover, SNAE can help discriminate between triptans, with almotriptan having the highest SNAE score. Kaplan–Meier plots are also relevant when evaluating migraine treatments. The use of symptomatic medication may lead to the paradoxical development of medication-overuse headache. In general practice, patients should use simple tools for pain measurement (e.g. headache diary) and a QOL questionnaire. A composite endpoint of pain resolution and QOL restoration would constitute a step forward in migraine management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3451945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34519452012-11-29 Meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints? Antonaci, Fabio Sances, Grazia Guaschino, Elena De Cillis, Ilaria Bono, Giorgio Nappi, Giuseppe J Headache Pain Review Clinical outcomes of migraine treatment are generally based on two major endpoints: acute pain resolution and effects on quality of life (QOL). Resolution of acute pain can be evaluated in a number of ways, each increasingly challenging to achieve; pain relief, pain freedom at 2 h, sustained pain-freedom, and SPF plus no adverse events (SNAE, the most challenging). QOL questionnaires help assess the burden of migraine and identify optimal treatments. Pain resolution and improved QOL form the basis of the ultimate target—meeting patient expectations, to achieve patient satisfaction. To achieve this, it is crucial to choose appropriate endpoints that reflect realistic treatment goals for individual patients. Moreover, SNAE can help discriminate between triptans, with almotriptan having the highest SNAE score. Kaplan–Meier plots are also relevant when evaluating migraine treatments. The use of symptomatic medication may lead to the paradoxical development of medication-overuse headache. In general practice, patients should use simple tools for pain measurement (e.g. headache diary) and a QOL questionnaire. A composite endpoint of pain resolution and QOL restoration would constitute a step forward in migraine management. Springer Milan 2008-07-08 2008-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3451945/ /pubmed/18607535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-008-0052-8 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2008 |
spellingShingle | Review Antonaci, Fabio Sances, Grazia Guaschino, Elena De Cillis, Ilaria Bono, Giorgio Nappi, Giuseppe Meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints? |
title | Meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints? |
title_full | Meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints? |
title_fullStr | Meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints? |
title_full_unstemmed | Meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints? |
title_short | Meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints? |
title_sort | meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3451945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18607535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-008-0052-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT antonacifabio meetingpatientexpectationsinmigrainetreatmentwhatarethekeyendpoints AT sancesgrazia meetingpatientexpectationsinmigrainetreatmentwhatarethekeyendpoints AT guaschinoelena meetingpatientexpectationsinmigrainetreatmentwhatarethekeyendpoints AT decillisilaria meetingpatientexpectationsinmigrainetreatmentwhatarethekeyendpoints AT bonogiorgio meetingpatientexpectationsinmigrainetreatmentwhatarethekeyendpoints AT nappigiuseppe meetingpatientexpectationsinmigrainetreatmentwhatarethekeyendpoints |