Cargando…

Meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints?

Clinical outcomes of migraine treatment are generally based on two major endpoints: acute pain resolution and effects on quality of life (QOL). Resolution of acute pain can be evaluated in a number of ways, each increasingly challenging to achieve; pain relief, pain freedom at 2 h, sustained pain-fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antonaci, Fabio, Sances, Grazia, Guaschino, Elena, De Cillis, Ilaria, Bono, Giorgio, Nappi, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3451945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18607535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-008-0052-8
_version_ 1782244407061250048
author Antonaci, Fabio
Sances, Grazia
Guaschino, Elena
De Cillis, Ilaria
Bono, Giorgio
Nappi, Giuseppe
author_facet Antonaci, Fabio
Sances, Grazia
Guaschino, Elena
De Cillis, Ilaria
Bono, Giorgio
Nappi, Giuseppe
author_sort Antonaci, Fabio
collection PubMed
description Clinical outcomes of migraine treatment are generally based on two major endpoints: acute pain resolution and effects on quality of life (QOL). Resolution of acute pain can be evaluated in a number of ways, each increasingly challenging to achieve; pain relief, pain freedom at 2 h, sustained pain-freedom, and SPF plus no adverse events (SNAE, the most challenging). QOL questionnaires help assess the burden of migraine and identify optimal treatments. Pain resolution and improved QOL form the basis of the ultimate target—meeting patient expectations, to achieve patient satisfaction. To achieve this, it is crucial to choose appropriate endpoints that reflect realistic treatment goals for individual patients. Moreover, SNAE can help discriminate between triptans, with almotriptan having the highest SNAE score. Kaplan–Meier plots are also relevant when evaluating migraine treatments. The use of symptomatic medication may lead to the paradoxical development of medication-overuse headache. In general practice, patients should use simple tools for pain measurement (e.g. headache diary) and a QOL questionnaire. A composite endpoint of pain resolution and QOL restoration would constitute a step forward in migraine management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3451945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34519452012-11-29 Meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints? Antonaci, Fabio Sances, Grazia Guaschino, Elena De Cillis, Ilaria Bono, Giorgio Nappi, Giuseppe J Headache Pain Review Clinical outcomes of migraine treatment are generally based on two major endpoints: acute pain resolution and effects on quality of life (QOL). Resolution of acute pain can be evaluated in a number of ways, each increasingly challenging to achieve; pain relief, pain freedom at 2 h, sustained pain-freedom, and SPF plus no adverse events (SNAE, the most challenging). QOL questionnaires help assess the burden of migraine and identify optimal treatments. Pain resolution and improved QOL form the basis of the ultimate target—meeting patient expectations, to achieve patient satisfaction. To achieve this, it is crucial to choose appropriate endpoints that reflect realistic treatment goals for individual patients. Moreover, SNAE can help discriminate between triptans, with almotriptan having the highest SNAE score. Kaplan–Meier plots are also relevant when evaluating migraine treatments. The use of symptomatic medication may lead to the paradoxical development of medication-overuse headache. In general practice, patients should use simple tools for pain measurement (e.g. headache diary) and a QOL questionnaire. A composite endpoint of pain resolution and QOL restoration would constitute a step forward in migraine management. Springer Milan 2008-07-08 2008-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3451945/ /pubmed/18607535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-008-0052-8 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2008
spellingShingle Review
Antonaci, Fabio
Sances, Grazia
Guaschino, Elena
De Cillis, Ilaria
Bono, Giorgio
Nappi, Giuseppe
Meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints?
title Meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints?
title_full Meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints?
title_fullStr Meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints?
title_full_unstemmed Meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints?
title_short Meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints?
title_sort meeting patient expectations in migraine treatment: what are the key endpoints?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3451945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18607535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-008-0052-8
work_keys_str_mv AT antonacifabio meetingpatientexpectationsinmigrainetreatmentwhatarethekeyendpoints
AT sancesgrazia meetingpatientexpectationsinmigrainetreatmentwhatarethekeyendpoints
AT guaschinoelena meetingpatientexpectationsinmigrainetreatmentwhatarethekeyendpoints
AT decillisilaria meetingpatientexpectationsinmigrainetreatmentwhatarethekeyendpoints
AT bonogiorgio meetingpatientexpectationsinmigrainetreatmentwhatarethekeyendpoints
AT nappigiuseppe meetingpatientexpectationsinmigrainetreatmentwhatarethekeyendpoints