Cargando…
The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006–2008
The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 3) performed in 2006–2008 is a replication of the cross-sectional survey from 1995 to 1997 (HUNT 2). The aim of the present study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of questionnaire-based headache diagnoses using a personal interview by a neurologist...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3452179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19946790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-009-0174-7 |
_version_ | 1782244444763848704 |
---|---|
author | Hagen, Knut Zwart, John-Anker Aamodt, Anne Hege Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard Bråthen, Geir Helde, Grethe Stjern, Marit Tronvik, Erling A. Stovner, Lars Jacob |
author_facet | Hagen, Knut Zwart, John-Anker Aamodt, Anne Hege Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard Bråthen, Geir Helde, Grethe Stjern, Marit Tronvik, Erling A. Stovner, Lars Jacob |
author_sort | Hagen, Knut |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 3) performed in 2006–2008 is a replication of the cross-sectional survey from 1995 to 1997 (HUNT 2). The aim of the present study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of questionnaire-based headache diagnoses using a personal interview by a neurologist as a gold standard. For the questionnaire-based status as headache sufferer, a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 86%, and a kappa statistic of 0.70 were found. Chronic headache, chronic tension-type headache (TTH), and medication overuse headache (MOH) were diagnosed with a specificity of ≥99%, and a kappa statistic of ≥0.73. Lower figures were found for the diagnoses of migraine and TTH. For individuals with headache ≥1 day per month, a sensitivity of 58% (migraine) and 96% (TTH), a specificity of 91 and 69%, and a kappa statistic of 0.54 and 0.44 were found, respectively. The specificity for migraine with aura was 95%. In conclusion, the HUNT 3-questionnaire is a valid tool for identifying headache sufferers, and diagnosing patients with chronic headache, including chronic TTH and MOH. The more moderate sensitivity for migraine and TTH makes the questionnaire-based diagnoses of migraine and TTH suboptimal for determining the prevalence. However, the high specificity of the questionnaire-based diagnosis of migraine, in particular for migraine with aura, makes the questionnaire a valid tool for diagnosing patients with migraine for genetic studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3452179 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34521792012-11-29 The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006–2008 Hagen, Knut Zwart, John-Anker Aamodt, Anne Hege Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard Bråthen, Geir Helde, Grethe Stjern, Marit Tronvik, Erling A. Stovner, Lars Jacob J Headache Pain Original The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 3) performed in 2006–2008 is a replication of the cross-sectional survey from 1995 to 1997 (HUNT 2). The aim of the present study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of questionnaire-based headache diagnoses using a personal interview by a neurologist as a gold standard. For the questionnaire-based status as headache sufferer, a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 86%, and a kappa statistic of 0.70 were found. Chronic headache, chronic tension-type headache (TTH), and medication overuse headache (MOH) were diagnosed with a specificity of ≥99%, and a kappa statistic of ≥0.73. Lower figures were found for the diagnoses of migraine and TTH. For individuals with headache ≥1 day per month, a sensitivity of 58% (migraine) and 96% (TTH), a specificity of 91 and 69%, and a kappa statistic of 0.54 and 0.44 were found, respectively. The specificity for migraine with aura was 95%. In conclusion, the HUNT 3-questionnaire is a valid tool for identifying headache sufferers, and diagnosing patients with chronic headache, including chronic TTH and MOH. The more moderate sensitivity for migraine and TTH makes the questionnaire-based diagnoses of migraine and TTH suboptimal for determining the prevalence. However, the high specificity of the questionnaire-based diagnosis of migraine, in particular for migraine with aura, makes the questionnaire a valid tool for diagnosing patients with migraine for genetic studies. Springer Milan 2009-11-28 2010-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3452179/ /pubmed/19946790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-009-0174-7 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2009 |
spellingShingle | Original Hagen, Knut Zwart, John-Anker Aamodt, Anne Hege Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard Bråthen, Geir Helde, Grethe Stjern, Marit Tronvik, Erling A. Stovner, Lars Jacob The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006–2008 |
title | The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006–2008 |
title_full | The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006–2008 |
title_fullStr | The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006–2008 |
title_full_unstemmed | The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006–2008 |
title_short | The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006–2008 |
title_sort | validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third nord-trøndelag health study 2006–2008 |
topic | Original |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3452179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19946790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-009-0174-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hagenknut thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT zwartjohnanker thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT aamodtannehege thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT nilsenkristianbernhard thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT brathengeir thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT heldegrethe thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT stjernmarit thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT tronvikerlinga thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT stovnerlarsjacob thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT hagenknut validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT zwartjohnanker validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT aamodtannehege validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT nilsenkristianbernhard validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT brathengeir validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT heldegrethe validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT stjernmarit validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT tronvikerlinga validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 AT stovnerlarsjacob validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008 |