Cargando…

The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006–2008

The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 3) performed in 2006–2008 is a replication of the cross-sectional survey from 1995 to 1997 (HUNT 2). The aim of the present study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of questionnaire-based headache diagnoses using a personal interview by a neurologist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hagen, Knut, Zwart, John-Anker, Aamodt, Anne Hege, Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard, Bråthen, Geir, Helde, Grethe, Stjern, Marit, Tronvik, Erling A., Stovner, Lars Jacob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3452179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19946790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-009-0174-7
_version_ 1782244444763848704
author Hagen, Knut
Zwart, John-Anker
Aamodt, Anne Hege
Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard
Bråthen, Geir
Helde, Grethe
Stjern, Marit
Tronvik, Erling A.
Stovner, Lars Jacob
author_facet Hagen, Knut
Zwart, John-Anker
Aamodt, Anne Hege
Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard
Bråthen, Geir
Helde, Grethe
Stjern, Marit
Tronvik, Erling A.
Stovner, Lars Jacob
author_sort Hagen, Knut
collection PubMed
description The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 3) performed in 2006–2008 is a replication of the cross-sectional survey from 1995 to 1997 (HUNT 2). The aim of the present study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of questionnaire-based headache diagnoses using a personal interview by a neurologist as a gold standard. For the questionnaire-based status as headache sufferer, a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 86%, and a kappa statistic of 0.70 were found. Chronic headache, chronic tension-type headache (TTH), and medication overuse headache (MOH) were diagnosed with a specificity of ≥99%, and a kappa statistic of ≥0.73. Lower figures were found for the diagnoses of migraine and TTH. For individuals with headache ≥1 day per month, a sensitivity of 58% (migraine) and 96% (TTH), a specificity of 91 and 69%, and a kappa statistic of 0.54 and 0.44 were found, respectively. The specificity for migraine with aura was 95%. In conclusion, the HUNT 3-questionnaire is a valid tool for identifying headache sufferers, and diagnosing patients with chronic headache, including chronic TTH and MOH. The more moderate sensitivity for migraine and TTH makes the questionnaire-based diagnoses of migraine and TTH suboptimal for determining the prevalence. However, the high specificity of the questionnaire-based diagnosis of migraine, in particular for migraine with aura, makes the questionnaire a valid tool for diagnosing patients with migraine for genetic studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3452179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34521792012-11-29 The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006–2008 Hagen, Knut Zwart, John-Anker Aamodt, Anne Hege Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard Bråthen, Geir Helde, Grethe Stjern, Marit Tronvik, Erling A. Stovner, Lars Jacob J Headache Pain Original The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 3) performed in 2006–2008 is a replication of the cross-sectional survey from 1995 to 1997 (HUNT 2). The aim of the present study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of questionnaire-based headache diagnoses using a personal interview by a neurologist as a gold standard. For the questionnaire-based status as headache sufferer, a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 86%, and a kappa statistic of 0.70 were found. Chronic headache, chronic tension-type headache (TTH), and medication overuse headache (MOH) were diagnosed with a specificity of ≥99%, and a kappa statistic of ≥0.73. Lower figures were found for the diagnoses of migraine and TTH. For individuals with headache ≥1 day per month, a sensitivity of 58% (migraine) and 96% (TTH), a specificity of 91 and 69%, and a kappa statistic of 0.54 and 0.44 were found, respectively. The specificity for migraine with aura was 95%. In conclusion, the HUNT 3-questionnaire is a valid tool for identifying headache sufferers, and diagnosing patients with chronic headache, including chronic TTH and MOH. The more moderate sensitivity for migraine and TTH makes the questionnaire-based diagnoses of migraine and TTH suboptimal for determining the prevalence. However, the high specificity of the questionnaire-based diagnosis of migraine, in particular for migraine with aura, makes the questionnaire a valid tool for diagnosing patients with migraine for genetic studies. Springer Milan 2009-11-28 2010-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3452179/ /pubmed/19946790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-009-0174-7 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2009
spellingShingle Original
Hagen, Knut
Zwart, John-Anker
Aamodt, Anne Hege
Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard
Bråthen, Geir
Helde, Grethe
Stjern, Marit
Tronvik, Erling A.
Stovner, Lars Jacob
The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006–2008
title The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006–2008
title_full The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006–2008
title_fullStr The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006–2008
title_full_unstemmed The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006–2008
title_short The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006–2008
title_sort validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third nord-trøndelag health study 2006–2008
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3452179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19946790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-009-0174-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hagenknut thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT zwartjohnanker thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT aamodtannehege thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT nilsenkristianbernhard thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT brathengeir thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT heldegrethe thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT stjernmarit thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT tronvikerlinga thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT stovnerlarsjacob thevalidityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT hagenknut validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT zwartjohnanker validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT aamodtannehege validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT nilsenkristianbernhard validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT brathengeir validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT heldegrethe validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT stjernmarit validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT tronvikerlinga validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008
AT stovnerlarsjacob validityofquestionnairebaseddiagnosesthethirdnordtrøndelaghealthstudy20062008