Cargando…

Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails

PURPOSE: To report the surgical outcomes of reoperation of unclosed macular holes after initial vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling. PROCEDURES: Seven eyes of 7 patients were submitted to a second procedure in which five radial retinal incisions were made, as deep as the retinal pigme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reis, R., Ferreira, N., Meireles, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3457032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23071465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000342007
_version_ 1782244533282537472
author Reis, R.
Ferreira, N.
Meireles, A.
author_facet Reis, R.
Ferreira, N.
Meireles, A.
author_sort Reis, R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To report the surgical outcomes of reoperation of unclosed macular holes after initial vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling. PROCEDURES: Seven eyes of 7 patients were submitted to a second procedure in which five radial retinal incisions were made, as deep as the retinal pigment epithelium, beginning one hole diameter away from its borders and extending centripetally until the hole's margins, avoiding the papilomacular bundle. Gas tamponade was performed and face-down positioning was recommended. RESULTS: Anatomical closure was achieved in all cases with the second procedure. Functional success was achieved in every patient; there was no loss of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) lines. Mean line score gain was 5.6 lines (range 1–9 lines), with a mean final BCVA of 0.42 (range 0.05–0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Perifoveal relaxing incisions in stage IV macular holes that remained unclosed after internal limiting membrane peeling vitrectomy seem to have a positive effect on MH closure rates. Larger case series and an extended follow-up period are necessary in order to assess the efficacy and safety profile of this so far promising technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3457032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34570322012-10-15 Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails Reis, R. Ferreira, N. Meireles, A. Case Rep Ophthalmol Published online: August, 2012 PURPOSE: To report the surgical outcomes of reoperation of unclosed macular holes after initial vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling. PROCEDURES: Seven eyes of 7 patients were submitted to a second procedure in which five radial retinal incisions were made, as deep as the retinal pigment epithelium, beginning one hole diameter away from its borders and extending centripetally until the hole's margins, avoiding the papilomacular bundle. Gas tamponade was performed and face-down positioning was recommended. RESULTS: Anatomical closure was achieved in all cases with the second procedure. Functional success was achieved in every patient; there was no loss of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) lines. Mean line score gain was 5.6 lines (range 1–9 lines), with a mean final BCVA of 0.42 (range 0.05–0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Perifoveal relaxing incisions in stage IV macular holes that remained unclosed after internal limiting membrane peeling vitrectomy seem to have a positive effect on MH closure rates. Larger case series and an extended follow-up period are necessary in order to assess the efficacy and safety profile of this so far promising technique. S. Karger AG 2012-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3457032/ /pubmed/23071465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000342007 Text en Copyright © 2012 by S. Karger AG, Basel http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No-Derivative-Works License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Users may download, print and share this work on the Internet for noncommercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited, and a link to the original work on http://www.karger.com and the terms of this license are included in any shared versions.
spellingShingle Published online: August, 2012
Reis, R.
Ferreira, N.
Meireles, A.
Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails
title Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails
title_full Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails
title_fullStr Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails
title_full_unstemmed Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails
title_short Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails
title_sort management of stage iv macular holes: when standard surgery fails
topic Published online: August, 2012
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3457032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23071465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000342007
work_keys_str_mv AT reisr managementofstageivmacularholeswhenstandardsurgeryfails
AT ferreiran managementofstageivmacularholeswhenstandardsurgeryfails
AT meirelesa managementofstageivmacularholeswhenstandardsurgeryfails