Cargando…
Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails
PURPOSE: To report the surgical outcomes of reoperation of unclosed macular holes after initial vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling. PROCEDURES: Seven eyes of 7 patients were submitted to a second procedure in which five radial retinal incisions were made, as deep as the retinal pigme...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
S. Karger AG
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3457032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23071465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000342007 |
_version_ | 1782244533282537472 |
---|---|
author | Reis, R. Ferreira, N. Meireles, A. |
author_facet | Reis, R. Ferreira, N. Meireles, A. |
author_sort | Reis, R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To report the surgical outcomes of reoperation of unclosed macular holes after initial vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling. PROCEDURES: Seven eyes of 7 patients were submitted to a second procedure in which five radial retinal incisions were made, as deep as the retinal pigment epithelium, beginning one hole diameter away from its borders and extending centripetally until the hole's margins, avoiding the papilomacular bundle. Gas tamponade was performed and face-down positioning was recommended. RESULTS: Anatomical closure was achieved in all cases with the second procedure. Functional success was achieved in every patient; there was no loss of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) lines. Mean line score gain was 5.6 lines (range 1–9 lines), with a mean final BCVA of 0.42 (range 0.05–0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Perifoveal relaxing incisions in stage IV macular holes that remained unclosed after internal limiting membrane peeling vitrectomy seem to have a positive effect on MH closure rates. Larger case series and an extended follow-up period are necessary in order to assess the efficacy and safety profile of this so far promising technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3457032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | S. Karger AG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34570322012-10-15 Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails Reis, R. Ferreira, N. Meireles, A. Case Rep Ophthalmol Published online: August, 2012 PURPOSE: To report the surgical outcomes of reoperation of unclosed macular holes after initial vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling. PROCEDURES: Seven eyes of 7 patients were submitted to a second procedure in which five radial retinal incisions were made, as deep as the retinal pigment epithelium, beginning one hole diameter away from its borders and extending centripetally until the hole's margins, avoiding the papilomacular bundle. Gas tamponade was performed and face-down positioning was recommended. RESULTS: Anatomical closure was achieved in all cases with the second procedure. Functional success was achieved in every patient; there was no loss of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) lines. Mean line score gain was 5.6 lines (range 1–9 lines), with a mean final BCVA of 0.42 (range 0.05–0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Perifoveal relaxing incisions in stage IV macular holes that remained unclosed after internal limiting membrane peeling vitrectomy seem to have a positive effect on MH closure rates. Larger case series and an extended follow-up period are necessary in order to assess the efficacy and safety profile of this so far promising technique. S. Karger AG 2012-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3457032/ /pubmed/23071465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000342007 Text en Copyright © 2012 by S. Karger AG, Basel http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No-Derivative-Works License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Users may download, print and share this work on the Internet for noncommercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited, and a link to the original work on http://www.karger.com and the terms of this license are included in any shared versions. |
spellingShingle | Published online: August, 2012 Reis, R. Ferreira, N. Meireles, A. Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails |
title | Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails |
title_full | Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails |
title_fullStr | Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails |
title_full_unstemmed | Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails |
title_short | Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails |
title_sort | management of stage iv macular holes: when standard surgery fails |
topic | Published online: August, 2012 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3457032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23071465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000342007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reisr managementofstageivmacularholeswhenstandardsurgeryfails AT ferreiran managementofstageivmacularholeswhenstandardsurgeryfails AT meirelesa managementofstageivmacularholeswhenstandardsurgeryfails |