Cargando…

A Catalog of Rules, Variables, and Definitions Applied to Accelerometer Data in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2006

INTRODUCTION: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) included accelerometry in the 2003–2006 data collection cycles. Researchers have used these data since their release in 2007, but the data have not been consistently treated, examined, or reported. The objective of this stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tudor-Locke, Catrine, Camhi, Sarah M., Troiano, Richard P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3457743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22698174
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd9.110332
_version_ 1782244565537783808
author Tudor-Locke, Catrine
Camhi, Sarah M.
Troiano, Richard P.
author_facet Tudor-Locke, Catrine
Camhi, Sarah M.
Troiano, Richard P.
author_sort Tudor-Locke, Catrine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) included accelerometry in the 2003–2006 data collection cycles. Researchers have used these data since their release in 2007, but the data have not been consistently treated, examined, or reported. The objective of this study was to aggregate data from studies using NHANES accelerometry data and to catalogue study decision rules, derived variables, and cut point definitions to facilitate a more uniform approach to these data. METHODS: We conducted a PubMed search of English-language articles published (or indicated as forthcoming) from January 2007 through December 2011. Our initial search yielded 74 articles, plus 1 article that was not indexed in PubMed. After excluding 21 articles, we extracted and tabulated details on 54 studies to permit comparison among studies. RESULTS: The 54 articles represented various descriptive, methodological, and inferential analyses. Although some decision rules for treating data (eg, criteria for minimal wear-time) were consistently applied, cut point definitions used for accelerometer-derived variables (eg, time spent in various intensities of physical activity) were especially diverse. CONCLUSION: Unique research questions may require equally unique analytical approaches; some inconsistency in approaches must be tolerated if scientific discovery is to be encouraged. This catalog provides a starting point for researchers to consider relevant and/or comparable accelerometer decision rules, derived variables, and cut point definitions for their own research questions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3457743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34577432012-11-13 A Catalog of Rules, Variables, and Definitions Applied to Accelerometer Data in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2006 Tudor-Locke, Catrine Camhi, Sarah M. Troiano, Richard P. Prev Chronic Dis Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) included accelerometry in the 2003–2006 data collection cycles. Researchers have used these data since their release in 2007, but the data have not been consistently treated, examined, or reported. The objective of this study was to aggregate data from studies using NHANES accelerometry data and to catalogue study decision rules, derived variables, and cut point definitions to facilitate a more uniform approach to these data. METHODS: We conducted a PubMed search of English-language articles published (or indicated as forthcoming) from January 2007 through December 2011. Our initial search yielded 74 articles, plus 1 article that was not indexed in PubMed. After excluding 21 articles, we extracted and tabulated details on 54 studies to permit comparison among studies. RESULTS: The 54 articles represented various descriptive, methodological, and inferential analyses. Although some decision rules for treating data (eg, criteria for minimal wear-time) were consistently applied, cut point definitions used for accelerometer-derived variables (eg, time spent in various intensities of physical activity) were especially diverse. CONCLUSION: Unique research questions may require equally unique analytical approaches; some inconsistency in approaches must be tolerated if scientific discovery is to be encouraged. This catalog provides a starting point for researchers to consider relevant and/or comparable accelerometer decision rules, derived variables, and cut point definitions for their own research questions. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2012-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3457743/ /pubmed/22698174 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd9.110332 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Tudor-Locke, Catrine
Camhi, Sarah M.
Troiano, Richard P.
A Catalog of Rules, Variables, and Definitions Applied to Accelerometer Data in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2006
title A Catalog of Rules, Variables, and Definitions Applied to Accelerometer Data in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2006
title_full A Catalog of Rules, Variables, and Definitions Applied to Accelerometer Data in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2006
title_fullStr A Catalog of Rules, Variables, and Definitions Applied to Accelerometer Data in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2006
title_full_unstemmed A Catalog of Rules, Variables, and Definitions Applied to Accelerometer Data in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2006
title_short A Catalog of Rules, Variables, and Definitions Applied to Accelerometer Data in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2006
title_sort catalog of rules, variables, and definitions applied to accelerometer data in the national health and nutrition examination survey, 2003–2006
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3457743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22698174
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd9.110332
work_keys_str_mv AT tudorlockecatrine acatalogofrulesvariablesanddefinitionsappliedtoaccelerometerdatainthenationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey20032006
AT camhisarahm acatalogofrulesvariablesanddefinitionsappliedtoaccelerometerdatainthenationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey20032006
AT troianorichardp acatalogofrulesvariablesanddefinitionsappliedtoaccelerometerdatainthenationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey20032006
AT tudorlockecatrine catalogofrulesvariablesanddefinitionsappliedtoaccelerometerdatainthenationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey20032006
AT camhisarahm catalogofrulesvariablesanddefinitionsappliedtoaccelerometerdatainthenationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey20032006
AT troianorichardp catalogofrulesvariablesanddefinitionsappliedtoaccelerometerdatainthenationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey20032006