Cargando…
Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary
BACKGROUND: In myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), typically a stress and a rest study is performed. If the stress study is considered normal, there is no need for a subsequent rest study. The aim of the study was to determine whether nuclear medicine technologists are able to assess the necess...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3457849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22947251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-97 |
_version_ | 1782244574369939456 |
---|---|
author | Trägårdh, Elin Johansson, Liselott Olofsson, Camilla Valind, Sven Edenbrandt, Lars |
author_facet | Trägårdh, Elin Johansson, Liselott Olofsson, Camilla Valind, Sven Edenbrandt, Lars |
author_sort | Trägårdh, Elin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), typically a stress and a rest study is performed. If the stress study is considered normal, there is no need for a subsequent rest study. The aim of the study was to determine whether nuclear medicine technologists are able to assess the necessity of a rest study. METHODS: Gated MPS using a 2-day 99mTc protocol for 121 consecutive patients were studied. Visual interpretation by 3 physicians was used as gold standard for determining the need for a rest study based on the stress images. All nuclear medicine technologists performing MPS had to review 82 training cases of stress MPS images with comments regarding the need for rest studies, and thereafter a test consisting of 20 stress MPS images. After passing this test, the nuclear medicine technologists in charge of a stress MPS study assessed whether a rest study was needed or not or if he/she was uncertain and wanted to consult a physician. After that, the physician in charge interpreted the images and decided whether a rest study was required or not. RESULTS: The nuclear medicine technologists and the physicians in clinical routine agreed in 103 of the 107 cases (96%) for which the technologists felt certain regarding the need for a rest study. In the remaining 14 cases the technologists were uncertain, i.e. wanted to consult a physician. The agreement between the technologists and the physicians in clinical routine was very good, resulting in a kappa value of 0.92. There was no statistically significant difference in the evaluations made by technicians and physicians (P = 0.617). CONCLUSIONS: The nuclear medicine technologists were able to accurately determine whether a rest study was necessary. There was very good agreement between nuclear medicine technologists and physicians in the assessment of the need for a rest study. If the technologists can make this decision, the effectiveness of the nuclear medicine department will improve. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3457849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34578492012-09-26 Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary Trägårdh, Elin Johansson, Liselott Olofsson, Camilla Valind, Sven Edenbrandt, Lars BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: In myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), typically a stress and a rest study is performed. If the stress study is considered normal, there is no need for a subsequent rest study. The aim of the study was to determine whether nuclear medicine technologists are able to assess the necessity of a rest study. METHODS: Gated MPS using a 2-day 99mTc protocol for 121 consecutive patients were studied. Visual interpretation by 3 physicians was used as gold standard for determining the need for a rest study based on the stress images. All nuclear medicine technologists performing MPS had to review 82 training cases of stress MPS images with comments regarding the need for rest studies, and thereafter a test consisting of 20 stress MPS images. After passing this test, the nuclear medicine technologists in charge of a stress MPS study assessed whether a rest study was needed or not or if he/she was uncertain and wanted to consult a physician. After that, the physician in charge interpreted the images and decided whether a rest study was required or not. RESULTS: The nuclear medicine technologists and the physicians in clinical routine agreed in 103 of the 107 cases (96%) for which the technologists felt certain regarding the need for a rest study. In the remaining 14 cases the technologists were uncertain, i.e. wanted to consult a physician. The agreement between the technologists and the physicians in clinical routine was very good, resulting in a kappa value of 0.92. There was no statistically significant difference in the evaluations made by technicians and physicians (P = 0.617). CONCLUSIONS: The nuclear medicine technologists were able to accurately determine whether a rest study was necessary. There was very good agreement between nuclear medicine technologists and physicians in the assessment of the need for a rest study. If the technologists can make this decision, the effectiveness of the nuclear medicine department will improve. BioMed Central 2012-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3457849/ /pubmed/22947251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-97 Text en Copyright ©2012 Trägårdh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Trägårdh, Elin Johansson, Liselott Olofsson, Camilla Valind, Sven Edenbrandt, Lars Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary |
title | Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary |
title_full | Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary |
title_fullStr | Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary |
title_full_unstemmed | Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary |
title_short | Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary |
title_sort | nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3457849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22947251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-97 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tragardhelin nuclearmedicinetechnologistsareabletoaccuratelydeterminewhenamyocardialperfusionreststudyisnecessary AT johanssonliselott nuclearmedicinetechnologistsareabletoaccuratelydeterminewhenamyocardialperfusionreststudyisnecessary AT olofssoncamilla nuclearmedicinetechnologistsareabletoaccuratelydeterminewhenamyocardialperfusionreststudyisnecessary AT valindsven nuclearmedicinetechnologistsareabletoaccuratelydeterminewhenamyocardialperfusionreststudyisnecessary AT edenbrandtlars nuclearmedicinetechnologistsareabletoaccuratelydeterminewhenamyocardialperfusionreststudyisnecessary |