Cargando…

Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary

BACKGROUND: In myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), typically a stress and a rest study is performed. If the stress study is considered normal, there is no need for a subsequent rest study. The aim of the study was to determine whether nuclear medicine technologists are able to assess the necess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trägårdh, Elin, Johansson, Liselott, Olofsson, Camilla, Valind, Sven, Edenbrandt, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3457849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22947251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-97
_version_ 1782244574369939456
author Trägårdh, Elin
Johansson, Liselott
Olofsson, Camilla
Valind, Sven
Edenbrandt, Lars
author_facet Trägårdh, Elin
Johansson, Liselott
Olofsson, Camilla
Valind, Sven
Edenbrandt, Lars
author_sort Trägårdh, Elin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), typically a stress and a rest study is performed. If the stress study is considered normal, there is no need for a subsequent rest study. The aim of the study was to determine whether nuclear medicine technologists are able to assess the necessity of a rest study. METHODS: Gated MPS using a 2-day 99mTc protocol for 121 consecutive patients were studied. Visual interpretation by 3 physicians was used as gold standard for determining the need for a rest study based on the stress images. All nuclear medicine technologists performing MPS had to review 82 training cases of stress MPS images with comments regarding the need for rest studies, and thereafter a test consisting of 20 stress MPS images. After passing this test, the nuclear medicine technologists in charge of a stress MPS study assessed whether a rest study was needed or not or if he/she was uncertain and wanted to consult a physician. After that, the physician in charge interpreted the images and decided whether a rest study was required or not. RESULTS: The nuclear medicine technologists and the physicians in clinical routine agreed in 103 of the 107 cases (96%) for which the technologists felt certain regarding the need for a rest study. In the remaining 14 cases the technologists were uncertain, i.e. wanted to consult a physician. The agreement between the technologists and the physicians in clinical routine was very good, resulting in a kappa value of 0.92. There was no statistically significant difference in the evaluations made by technicians and physicians (P = 0.617). CONCLUSIONS: The nuclear medicine technologists were able to accurately determine whether a rest study was necessary. There was very good agreement between nuclear medicine technologists and physicians in the assessment of the need for a rest study. If the technologists can make this decision, the effectiveness of the nuclear medicine department will improve.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3457849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34578492012-09-26 Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary Trägårdh, Elin Johansson, Liselott Olofsson, Camilla Valind, Sven Edenbrandt, Lars BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: In myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), typically a stress and a rest study is performed. If the stress study is considered normal, there is no need for a subsequent rest study. The aim of the study was to determine whether nuclear medicine technologists are able to assess the necessity of a rest study. METHODS: Gated MPS using a 2-day 99mTc protocol for 121 consecutive patients were studied. Visual interpretation by 3 physicians was used as gold standard for determining the need for a rest study based on the stress images. All nuclear medicine technologists performing MPS had to review 82 training cases of stress MPS images with comments regarding the need for rest studies, and thereafter a test consisting of 20 stress MPS images. After passing this test, the nuclear medicine technologists in charge of a stress MPS study assessed whether a rest study was needed or not or if he/she was uncertain and wanted to consult a physician. After that, the physician in charge interpreted the images and decided whether a rest study was required or not. RESULTS: The nuclear medicine technologists and the physicians in clinical routine agreed in 103 of the 107 cases (96%) for which the technologists felt certain regarding the need for a rest study. In the remaining 14 cases the technologists were uncertain, i.e. wanted to consult a physician. The agreement between the technologists and the physicians in clinical routine was very good, resulting in a kappa value of 0.92. There was no statistically significant difference in the evaluations made by technicians and physicians (P = 0.617). CONCLUSIONS: The nuclear medicine technologists were able to accurately determine whether a rest study was necessary. There was very good agreement between nuclear medicine technologists and physicians in the assessment of the need for a rest study. If the technologists can make this decision, the effectiveness of the nuclear medicine department will improve. BioMed Central 2012-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3457849/ /pubmed/22947251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-97 Text en Copyright ©2012 Trägårdh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Trägårdh, Elin
Johansson, Liselott
Olofsson, Camilla
Valind, Sven
Edenbrandt, Lars
Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary
title Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary
title_full Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary
title_fullStr Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary
title_full_unstemmed Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary
title_short Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary
title_sort nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3457849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22947251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-97
work_keys_str_mv AT tragardhelin nuclearmedicinetechnologistsareabletoaccuratelydeterminewhenamyocardialperfusionreststudyisnecessary
AT johanssonliselott nuclearmedicinetechnologistsareabletoaccuratelydeterminewhenamyocardialperfusionreststudyisnecessary
AT olofssoncamilla nuclearmedicinetechnologistsareabletoaccuratelydeterminewhenamyocardialperfusionreststudyisnecessary
AT valindsven nuclearmedicinetechnologistsareabletoaccuratelydeterminewhenamyocardialperfusionreststudyisnecessary
AT edenbrandtlars nuclearmedicinetechnologistsareabletoaccuratelydeterminewhenamyocardialperfusionreststudyisnecessary