Cargando…

What harm does a second delivery to the pelvic floor?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pelvic floor function of primiparous women to women after a second delivery regarding symptoms of urinary and anal incontinence, anal sphincter ruptures and bladder-neck mobility. METHODS: A questionnaire evaluating symptoms of urinary and anal incontinence was used in null...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jundt, K, Scheer, I, von Bodungen, V, Krumbachner, F, Friese, K, Peschers, UM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3458705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20947474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-15-8-362
_version_ 1782244685506412544
author Jundt, K
Scheer, I
von Bodungen, V
Krumbachner, F
Friese, K
Peschers, UM
author_facet Jundt, K
Scheer, I
von Bodungen, V
Krumbachner, F
Friese, K
Peschers, UM
author_sort Jundt, K
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the pelvic floor function of primiparous women to women after a second delivery regarding symptoms of urinary and anal incontinence, anal sphincter ruptures and bladder-neck mobility. METHODS: A questionnaire evaluating symptoms of urinary and anal incontinence was used in nulliparous women before and 27 months after childbirth. Furthermore these symptoms were correlated with functional changes of the pelvic floor based on a careful gynecologic examination as well as perineal and endoanal ultrasound. RESULTS: 112 nulliparous women were included, 49 women returned for follow-up on average 27 months (SD 4.4 months) after the first delivery. 39 women (group A) had just one delivery, 10 women (group B - 10/49) had had a second delivery. Apart from levator ani muscle strength, no significant difference between pelvic floor function of group A vs group B was demonstrable. Furthermore, we could show no significant difference for symptoms of urinary (11 (28.2%) vs. 5 (50.0%)) and anal incontinence (14 (35.9%) vs. 4 (40.0%)) between both groups. However, we found a lasting increase of stress urinary and anal incontinence as well as overactive bladder symptoms after one or more deliveries. The position of the bladder neck at rest was lower in both groups compared to the position before the first delivery and bladder neck mobility increased after one or more deliveries. DISCUSSION: Our study shows several statistically significant changes of the pelvic floor function even on average 27 months after delivery, but a subsequent delivery did not compromise the pelvic floor any further.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3458705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34587052012-09-27 What harm does a second delivery to the pelvic floor? Jundt, K Scheer, I von Bodungen, V Krumbachner, F Friese, K Peschers, UM Eur J Med Res Research OBJECTIVE: To compare the pelvic floor function of primiparous women to women after a second delivery regarding symptoms of urinary and anal incontinence, anal sphincter ruptures and bladder-neck mobility. METHODS: A questionnaire evaluating symptoms of urinary and anal incontinence was used in nulliparous women before and 27 months after childbirth. Furthermore these symptoms were correlated with functional changes of the pelvic floor based on a careful gynecologic examination as well as perineal and endoanal ultrasound. RESULTS: 112 nulliparous women were included, 49 women returned for follow-up on average 27 months (SD 4.4 months) after the first delivery. 39 women (group A) had just one delivery, 10 women (group B - 10/49) had had a second delivery. Apart from levator ani muscle strength, no significant difference between pelvic floor function of group A vs group B was demonstrable. Furthermore, we could show no significant difference for symptoms of urinary (11 (28.2%) vs. 5 (50.0%)) and anal incontinence (14 (35.9%) vs. 4 (40.0%)) between both groups. However, we found a lasting increase of stress urinary and anal incontinence as well as overactive bladder symptoms after one or more deliveries. The position of the bladder neck at rest was lower in both groups compared to the position before the first delivery and bladder neck mobility increased after one or more deliveries. DISCUSSION: Our study shows several statistically significant changes of the pelvic floor function even on average 27 months after delivery, but a subsequent delivery did not compromise the pelvic floor any further. BioMed Central 2010-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3458705/ /pubmed/20947474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-15-8-362 Text en Copyright ©2010 I. Holzapfel Publishers
spellingShingle Research
Jundt, K
Scheer, I
von Bodungen, V
Krumbachner, F
Friese, K
Peschers, UM
What harm does a second delivery to the pelvic floor?
title What harm does a second delivery to the pelvic floor?
title_full What harm does a second delivery to the pelvic floor?
title_fullStr What harm does a second delivery to the pelvic floor?
title_full_unstemmed What harm does a second delivery to the pelvic floor?
title_short What harm does a second delivery to the pelvic floor?
title_sort what harm does a second delivery to the pelvic floor?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3458705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20947474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-15-8-362
work_keys_str_mv AT jundtk whatharmdoesaseconddeliverytothepelvicfloor
AT scheeri whatharmdoesaseconddeliverytothepelvicfloor
AT vonbodungenv whatharmdoesaseconddeliverytothepelvicfloor
AT krumbachnerf whatharmdoesaseconddeliverytothepelvicfloor
AT friesek whatharmdoesaseconddeliverytothepelvicfloor
AT peschersum whatharmdoesaseconddeliverytothepelvicfloor