Cargando…
Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: The study objective was to assess the available data on efficacy and tolerability of antiseptics and disinfectants in treating bacterial vaginosis (BV). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted by consulting PubMed (1966-2010), CINAHL (1982-2010), IPA (1970-2010), and the Cochrane CENT...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3458956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22742642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-148 |
_version_ | 1782244741725814784 |
---|---|
author | Verstraelen, Hans Verhelst, Rita Roelens, Kristien Temmerman, Marleen |
author_facet | Verstraelen, Hans Verhelst, Rita Roelens, Kristien Temmerman, Marleen |
author_sort | Verstraelen, Hans |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The study objective was to assess the available data on efficacy and tolerability of antiseptics and disinfectants in treating bacterial vaginosis (BV). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted by consulting PubMed (1966-2010), CINAHL (1982-2010), IPA (1970-2010), and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Clinical trials were searched for by the generic names of all antiseptics and disinfectants listed in the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System under the code D08A. Clinical trials were considered eligible if the efficacy of antiseptics and disinfectants in the treatment of BV was assessed in comparison to placebo or standard antibiotic treatment with metronidazole or clindamycin and if diagnosis of BV relied on standard criteria such as Amsel’s and Nugent’s criteria. RESULTS: A total of 262 articles were found, of which 15 reports on clinical trials were assessed. Of these, four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were withheld from analysis. Reasons for exclusion were primarily the lack of standard criteria to diagnose BV or to assess cure, and control treatment not involving placebo or standard antibiotic treatment. Risk of bias for the included studies was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias. Three studies showed non-inferiority of chlorhexidine and polyhexamethylene biguanide compared to metronidazole or clindamycin. One RCT found that a single vaginal douche with hydrogen peroxide was slightly, though significantly less effective than a single oral dose of metronidazole. CONCLUSION: The use of antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of BV has been poorly studied and most studies are somehow methodologically flawed. There is insufficient evidence at present to advocate the use of these agents, although some studies suggest that some antiseptics may have equal efficacy compared to clindamycin or metronidazole. Further study is warranted with special regard to the long-term efficacy and safety of antiseptics and disinfectants for vaginal use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3458956 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34589562012-09-27 Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review Verstraelen, Hans Verhelst, Rita Roelens, Kristien Temmerman, Marleen BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The study objective was to assess the available data on efficacy and tolerability of antiseptics and disinfectants in treating bacterial vaginosis (BV). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted by consulting PubMed (1966-2010), CINAHL (1982-2010), IPA (1970-2010), and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Clinical trials were searched for by the generic names of all antiseptics and disinfectants listed in the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System under the code D08A. Clinical trials were considered eligible if the efficacy of antiseptics and disinfectants in the treatment of BV was assessed in comparison to placebo or standard antibiotic treatment with metronidazole or clindamycin and if diagnosis of BV relied on standard criteria such as Amsel’s and Nugent’s criteria. RESULTS: A total of 262 articles were found, of which 15 reports on clinical trials were assessed. Of these, four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were withheld from analysis. Reasons for exclusion were primarily the lack of standard criteria to diagnose BV or to assess cure, and control treatment not involving placebo or standard antibiotic treatment. Risk of bias for the included studies was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias. Three studies showed non-inferiority of chlorhexidine and polyhexamethylene biguanide compared to metronidazole or clindamycin. One RCT found that a single vaginal douche with hydrogen peroxide was slightly, though significantly less effective than a single oral dose of metronidazole. CONCLUSION: The use of antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of BV has been poorly studied and most studies are somehow methodologically flawed. There is insufficient evidence at present to advocate the use of these agents, although some studies suggest that some antiseptics may have equal efficacy compared to clindamycin or metronidazole. Further study is warranted with special regard to the long-term efficacy and safety of antiseptics and disinfectants for vaginal use. BioMed Central 2012-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3458956/ /pubmed/22742642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-148 Text en Copyright ©2012 Verstraelen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Verstraelen, Hans Verhelst, Rita Roelens, Kristien Temmerman, Marleen Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review |
title | Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review |
title_full | Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review |
title_short | Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review |
title_sort | antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3458956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22742642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-148 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verstraelenhans antisepticsanddisinfectantsforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisasystematicreview AT verhelstrita antisepticsanddisinfectantsforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisasystematicreview AT roelenskristien antisepticsanddisinfectantsforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisasystematicreview AT temmermanmarleen antisepticsanddisinfectantsforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisasystematicreview |