Cargando…

Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: The study objective was to assess the available data on efficacy and tolerability of antiseptics and disinfectants in treating bacterial vaginosis (BV). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted by consulting PubMed (1966-2010), CINAHL (1982-2010), IPA (1970-2010), and the Cochrane CENT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verstraelen, Hans, Verhelst, Rita, Roelens, Kristien, Temmerman, Marleen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3458956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22742642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-148
_version_ 1782244741725814784
author Verstraelen, Hans
Verhelst, Rita
Roelens, Kristien
Temmerman, Marleen
author_facet Verstraelen, Hans
Verhelst, Rita
Roelens, Kristien
Temmerman, Marleen
author_sort Verstraelen, Hans
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study objective was to assess the available data on efficacy and tolerability of antiseptics and disinfectants in treating bacterial vaginosis (BV). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted by consulting PubMed (1966-2010), CINAHL (1982-2010), IPA (1970-2010), and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Clinical trials were searched for by the generic names of all antiseptics and disinfectants listed in the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System under the code D08A. Clinical trials were considered eligible if the efficacy of antiseptics and disinfectants in the treatment of BV was assessed in comparison to placebo or standard antibiotic treatment with metronidazole or clindamycin and if diagnosis of BV relied on standard criteria such as Amsel’s and Nugent’s criteria. RESULTS: A total of 262 articles were found, of which 15 reports on clinical trials were assessed. Of these, four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were withheld from analysis. Reasons for exclusion were primarily the lack of standard criteria to diagnose BV or to assess cure, and control treatment not involving placebo or standard antibiotic treatment. Risk of bias for the included studies was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias. Three studies showed non-inferiority of chlorhexidine and polyhexamethylene biguanide compared to metronidazole or clindamycin. One RCT found that a single vaginal douche with hydrogen peroxide was slightly, though significantly less effective than a single oral dose of metronidazole. CONCLUSION: The use of antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of BV has been poorly studied and most studies are somehow methodologically flawed. There is insufficient evidence at present to advocate the use of these agents, although some studies suggest that some antiseptics may have equal efficacy compared to clindamycin or metronidazole. Further study is warranted with special regard to the long-term efficacy and safety of antiseptics and disinfectants for vaginal use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3458956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34589562012-09-27 Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review Verstraelen, Hans Verhelst, Rita Roelens, Kristien Temmerman, Marleen BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The study objective was to assess the available data on efficacy and tolerability of antiseptics and disinfectants in treating bacterial vaginosis (BV). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted by consulting PubMed (1966-2010), CINAHL (1982-2010), IPA (1970-2010), and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Clinical trials were searched for by the generic names of all antiseptics and disinfectants listed in the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System under the code D08A. Clinical trials were considered eligible if the efficacy of antiseptics and disinfectants in the treatment of BV was assessed in comparison to placebo or standard antibiotic treatment with metronidazole or clindamycin and if diagnosis of BV relied on standard criteria such as Amsel’s and Nugent’s criteria. RESULTS: A total of 262 articles were found, of which 15 reports on clinical trials were assessed. Of these, four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were withheld from analysis. Reasons for exclusion were primarily the lack of standard criteria to diagnose BV or to assess cure, and control treatment not involving placebo or standard antibiotic treatment. Risk of bias for the included studies was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias. Three studies showed non-inferiority of chlorhexidine and polyhexamethylene biguanide compared to metronidazole or clindamycin. One RCT found that a single vaginal douche with hydrogen peroxide was slightly, though significantly less effective than a single oral dose of metronidazole. CONCLUSION: The use of antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of BV has been poorly studied and most studies are somehow methodologically flawed. There is insufficient evidence at present to advocate the use of these agents, although some studies suggest that some antiseptics may have equal efficacy compared to clindamycin or metronidazole. Further study is warranted with special regard to the long-term efficacy and safety of antiseptics and disinfectants for vaginal use. BioMed Central 2012-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3458956/ /pubmed/22742642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-148 Text en Copyright ©2012 Verstraelen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Verstraelen, Hans
Verhelst, Rita
Roelens, Kristien
Temmerman, Marleen
Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review
title Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review
title_full Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review
title_fullStr Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review
title_short Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review
title_sort antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3458956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22742642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-148
work_keys_str_mv AT verstraelenhans antisepticsanddisinfectantsforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisasystematicreview
AT verhelstrita antisepticsanddisinfectantsforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisasystematicreview
AT roelenskristien antisepticsanddisinfectantsforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisasystematicreview
AT temmermanmarleen antisepticsanddisinfectantsforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisasystematicreview