Cargando…

Cerebellar rTMS disrupts predictive language processing

The human cerebellum plays an important role in language, amongst other cognitive and motor functions [1], but a unifying theoretical framework about cerebellar language function is lacking. In an established model of motor control, the cerebellum is seen as a predictive machine, making short-term e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lesage, Elise, Morgan, Blaire E., Olson, Andrew C., Meyer, Antje S., Miall, R. Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cell Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23017990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.006
_version_ 1782244761099304960
author Lesage, Elise
Morgan, Blaire E.
Olson, Andrew C.
Meyer, Antje S.
Miall, R. Chris
author_facet Lesage, Elise
Morgan, Blaire E.
Olson, Andrew C.
Meyer, Antje S.
Miall, R. Chris
author_sort Lesage, Elise
collection PubMed
description The human cerebellum plays an important role in language, amongst other cognitive and motor functions [1], but a unifying theoretical framework about cerebellar language function is lacking. In an established model of motor control, the cerebellum is seen as a predictive machine, making short-term estimations about the outcome of motor commands. This allows for flexible control, on-line correction, and coordination of movements [2]. The homogeneous cytoarchitecture of the cerebellar cortex suggests that similar computations occur throughout the structure, operating on different input signals and with different output targets [3]. Several authors have therefore argued that this ‘motor’ model may extend to cerebellar nonmotor functions [3–5], and that the cerebellum may support prediction in language processing [6]. However, this hypothesis has never been directly tested. Here, we used the ‘Visual World’ paradigm [7], where on-line processing of spoken sentence content can be assessed by recording the latencies of listeners' eye movements towards objects mentioned. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was used to disrupt function in the right cerebellum, a region implicated in language [8]. After cerebellar rTMS, listeners showed delayed eye fixations to target objects predicted by sentence content, while there was no effect on eye fixations in sentences without predictable content. The prediction deficit was absent in two control groups. Our findings support the hypothesis that computational operations performed by the cerebellum may support prediction during both motor control and language processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3459089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Cell Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34590892012-10-09 Cerebellar rTMS disrupts predictive language processing Lesage, Elise Morgan, Blaire E. Olson, Andrew C. Meyer, Antje S. Miall, R. Chris Curr Biol Correspondence The human cerebellum plays an important role in language, amongst other cognitive and motor functions [1], but a unifying theoretical framework about cerebellar language function is lacking. In an established model of motor control, the cerebellum is seen as a predictive machine, making short-term estimations about the outcome of motor commands. This allows for flexible control, on-line correction, and coordination of movements [2]. The homogeneous cytoarchitecture of the cerebellar cortex suggests that similar computations occur throughout the structure, operating on different input signals and with different output targets [3]. Several authors have therefore argued that this ‘motor’ model may extend to cerebellar nonmotor functions [3–5], and that the cerebellum may support prediction in language processing [6]. However, this hypothesis has never been directly tested. Here, we used the ‘Visual World’ paradigm [7], where on-line processing of spoken sentence content can be assessed by recording the latencies of listeners' eye movements towards objects mentioned. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was used to disrupt function in the right cerebellum, a region implicated in language [8]. After cerebellar rTMS, listeners showed delayed eye fixations to target objects predicted by sentence content, while there was no effect on eye fixations in sentences without predictable content. The prediction deficit was absent in two control groups. Our findings support the hypothesis that computational operations performed by the cerebellum may support prediction during both motor control and language processing. Cell Press 2012-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3459089/ /pubmed/23017990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.006 Text en © 2012 ELL & Excerpta Medica. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Correspondence
Lesage, Elise
Morgan, Blaire E.
Olson, Andrew C.
Meyer, Antje S.
Miall, R. Chris
Cerebellar rTMS disrupts predictive language processing
title Cerebellar rTMS disrupts predictive language processing
title_full Cerebellar rTMS disrupts predictive language processing
title_fullStr Cerebellar rTMS disrupts predictive language processing
title_full_unstemmed Cerebellar rTMS disrupts predictive language processing
title_short Cerebellar rTMS disrupts predictive language processing
title_sort cerebellar rtms disrupts predictive language processing
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23017990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.006
work_keys_str_mv AT lesageelise cerebellarrtmsdisruptspredictivelanguageprocessing
AT morganblairee cerebellarrtmsdisruptspredictivelanguageprocessing
AT olsonandrewc cerebellarrtmsdisruptspredictivelanguageprocessing
AT meyerantjes cerebellarrtmsdisruptspredictivelanguageprocessing
AT miallrchris cerebellarrtmsdisruptspredictivelanguageprocessing