Cargando…

Intravenous iron therapy: how far have we come?

Oral iron supplementation is usually the first choice for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) because of its effectiveness and low cost. But unfortunately in many iron deficient conditions, oral iron is a less than the ideal treatment mainly because of adverse events related to the gastroi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cançado, Rodolfo Delfini, Muñoz, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23049364
http://dx.doi.org/10.5581/1516-8484.20110123
_version_ 1782244780176048128
author Cançado, Rodolfo Delfini
Muñoz, Manuel
author_facet Cançado, Rodolfo Delfini
Muñoz, Manuel
author_sort Cançado, Rodolfo Delfini
collection PubMed
description Oral iron supplementation is usually the first choice for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) because of its effectiveness and low cost. But unfortunately in many iron deficient conditions, oral iron is a less than the ideal treatment mainly because of adverse events related to the gastrointestinal tract as well as the long course required to treat anemia and replenish body iron stores. The first iron product for intravenous use was high-molecular-weight iron dextran. However, dextran-containing intravenous iron preparations are associated with an elevated risk of anaphylactic reactions, which made physicians reluctant to prescribe intravenous iron in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia for many years. In 1999 and 2001, two new intravenous iron preparations (ferric gluconate and iron sucrose) were introduced into the market as safer alternatives to iron dextran. Over the last five years, three new intravenous iron dextran-free preparations have been developed and have better safety profiles than the more traditional intravenous compounds, as none require test doses and all these products are promising in respect to a more rapid replacement of body iron stores (15-60 minutes/infusion) as they can be given at higher doses (from 500 mg to more than 1000 mg/infusion). The purpose of this review is to discuss some pertinent issues in relation to the history, pharmacology, administration, efficacy, safety profile and toxicity of intravenous iron for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3459360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34593602012-10-04 Intravenous iron therapy: how far have we come? Cançado, Rodolfo Delfini Muñoz, Manuel Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter Review Article Oral iron supplementation is usually the first choice for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) because of its effectiveness and low cost. But unfortunately in many iron deficient conditions, oral iron is a less than the ideal treatment mainly because of adverse events related to the gastrointestinal tract as well as the long course required to treat anemia and replenish body iron stores. The first iron product for intravenous use was high-molecular-weight iron dextran. However, dextran-containing intravenous iron preparations are associated with an elevated risk of anaphylactic reactions, which made physicians reluctant to prescribe intravenous iron in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia for many years. In 1999 and 2001, two new intravenous iron preparations (ferric gluconate and iron sucrose) were introduced into the market as safer alternatives to iron dextran. Over the last five years, three new intravenous iron dextran-free preparations have been developed and have better safety profiles than the more traditional intravenous compounds, as none require test doses and all these products are promising in respect to a more rapid replacement of body iron stores (15-60 minutes/infusion) as they can be given at higher doses (from 500 mg to more than 1000 mg/infusion). The purpose of this review is to discuss some pertinent issues in relation to the history, pharmacology, administration, efficacy, safety profile and toxicity of intravenous iron for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia. Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3459360/ /pubmed/23049364 http://dx.doi.org/10.5581/1516-8484.20110123 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Cançado, Rodolfo Delfini
Muñoz, Manuel
Intravenous iron therapy: how far have we come?
title Intravenous iron therapy: how far have we come?
title_full Intravenous iron therapy: how far have we come?
title_fullStr Intravenous iron therapy: how far have we come?
title_full_unstemmed Intravenous iron therapy: how far have we come?
title_short Intravenous iron therapy: how far have we come?
title_sort intravenous iron therapy: how far have we come?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23049364
http://dx.doi.org/10.5581/1516-8484.20110123
work_keys_str_mv AT cancadorodolfodelfini intravenousirontherapyhowfarhavewecome
AT munozmanuel intravenousirontherapyhowfarhavewecome