Cargando…

Efficacy of 0.2% tempered chlorhexidine as a pre-procedural mouth rinse: A clinical study

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the efficacy of pre-procedural rinsing with chlorhexidine in reducing bacterial aerosol contamination during use of ultrasonic scaler and comparing the efficacy of water, non-tempered chlorhexidine and tempered chlorhexidine in reducing bacterial count in ae...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reddy, Shantipriya, Prasad, M. G. S, Kaul, Sanjay, Satish, K., Kakarala, Sabana, Bhowmik, Nirjhar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23055587
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.99264
_version_ 1782244806400933888
author Reddy, Shantipriya
Prasad, M. G. S
Kaul, Sanjay
Satish, K.
Kakarala, Sabana
Bhowmik, Nirjhar
author_facet Reddy, Shantipriya
Prasad, M. G. S
Kaul, Sanjay
Satish, K.
Kakarala, Sabana
Bhowmik, Nirjhar
author_sort Reddy, Shantipriya
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the efficacy of pre-procedural rinsing with chlorhexidine in reducing bacterial aerosol contamination during use of ultrasonic scaler and comparing the efficacy of water, non-tempered chlorhexidine and tempered chlorhexidine in reducing bacterial count in aerosols when used as a pre-procedural rinse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed to include 30 systemically healthy patients in different age groups. The patients were divided randomly into 3 groups (I, II, III) of 10 patients each to be administered with sterile water, non tempered chlorhexidine and tempered chlorhexidine, respectively, as a pre-procedural rinse. The aerosol produced by the ultrasonic unit was collected at 3° clock, 6° clock and 12° clock positions on blood agar plates within a range of 4 feet in all the three groups. The blood agar plates were incubated for 48 hours and the total number of colony forming units (CFUs) were counted and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The results showed that CFU in group III and group II were significantly reduced when compared to group I with F=1084.92, P<0.001 (ANOVA). Also, CFU in group III was significantly reduced when compared to group II with P<0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-procedural rinse can significantly reduce the viable microbial content of dental aerosols and tempered chlorhexidine was more effective than non-tempered chlorhexidine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3459501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34595012012-10-09 Efficacy of 0.2% tempered chlorhexidine as a pre-procedural mouth rinse: A clinical study Reddy, Shantipriya Prasad, M. G. S Kaul, Sanjay Satish, K. Kakarala, Sabana Bhowmik, Nirjhar J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the efficacy of pre-procedural rinsing with chlorhexidine in reducing bacterial aerosol contamination during use of ultrasonic scaler and comparing the efficacy of water, non-tempered chlorhexidine and tempered chlorhexidine in reducing bacterial count in aerosols when used as a pre-procedural rinse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed to include 30 systemically healthy patients in different age groups. The patients were divided randomly into 3 groups (I, II, III) of 10 patients each to be administered with sterile water, non tempered chlorhexidine and tempered chlorhexidine, respectively, as a pre-procedural rinse. The aerosol produced by the ultrasonic unit was collected at 3° clock, 6° clock and 12° clock positions on blood agar plates within a range of 4 feet in all the three groups. The blood agar plates were incubated for 48 hours and the total number of colony forming units (CFUs) were counted and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The results showed that CFU in group III and group II were significantly reduced when compared to group I with F=1084.92, P<0.001 (ANOVA). Also, CFU in group III was significantly reduced when compared to group II with P<0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-procedural rinse can significantly reduce the viable microbial content of dental aerosols and tempered chlorhexidine was more effective than non-tempered chlorhexidine. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3459501/ /pubmed/23055587 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.99264 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Reddy, Shantipriya
Prasad, M. G. S
Kaul, Sanjay
Satish, K.
Kakarala, Sabana
Bhowmik, Nirjhar
Efficacy of 0.2% tempered chlorhexidine as a pre-procedural mouth rinse: A clinical study
title Efficacy of 0.2% tempered chlorhexidine as a pre-procedural mouth rinse: A clinical study
title_full Efficacy of 0.2% tempered chlorhexidine as a pre-procedural mouth rinse: A clinical study
title_fullStr Efficacy of 0.2% tempered chlorhexidine as a pre-procedural mouth rinse: A clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of 0.2% tempered chlorhexidine as a pre-procedural mouth rinse: A clinical study
title_short Efficacy of 0.2% tempered chlorhexidine as a pre-procedural mouth rinse: A clinical study
title_sort efficacy of 0.2% tempered chlorhexidine as a pre-procedural mouth rinse: a clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23055587
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.99264
work_keys_str_mv AT reddyshantipriya efficacyof02temperedchlorhexidineasapreproceduralmouthrinseaclinicalstudy
AT prasadmgs efficacyof02temperedchlorhexidineasapreproceduralmouthrinseaclinicalstudy
AT kaulsanjay efficacyof02temperedchlorhexidineasapreproceduralmouthrinseaclinicalstudy
AT satishk efficacyof02temperedchlorhexidineasapreproceduralmouthrinseaclinicalstudy
AT kakaralasabana efficacyof02temperedchlorhexidineasapreproceduralmouthrinseaclinicalstudy
AT bhowmiknirjhar efficacyof02temperedchlorhexidineasapreproceduralmouthrinseaclinicalstudy