Cargando…

Effects of bioactive glass, hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass – Hydroxyapatite composite graft particles in the treatment of infrabony defects

BACKGROUND: Several synthetic alloplastic materials have been used in the past as an implant in infrabony defects with a goal to reconstruct the lost part of attachment apparatus via new osseous tissue formation. The present study was undertaken to evaluate and compare clinico-radiographically, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mistry, Surajit, Kundu, Debabrata, Datta, Someswar, Basu, Debabrata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23055592
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.99269
_version_ 1782244807849017344
author Mistry, Surajit
Kundu, Debabrata
Datta, Someswar
Basu, Debabrata
author_facet Mistry, Surajit
Kundu, Debabrata
Datta, Someswar
Basu, Debabrata
author_sort Mistry, Surajit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several synthetic alloplastic materials have been used in the past as an implant in infrabony defects with a goal to reconstruct the lost part of attachment apparatus via new osseous tissue formation. The present study was undertaken to evaluate and compare clinico-radiographically, the effect of bioactive glass (BG), hydroxyapatite (HA), and BG-HA composite bone graft particles in the treatment of human infra-bony periodontal defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Indigenous synthetic HA, BG, and BG-HA composite bone graft materials were developed in the laboratory. Twenty eight infrabony periodontal defects were equally distributed (i.e., seven defects) into four groups. The defects were treated separately with three types of graft materials and non-grafted manner (open flap debridement alone, control) to evaluate both the soft and hard tissue responses after six months of surgery. Evaluation was done by studying different parameters such as plaque index, gingival index, relative attachment level, probing pocket depth, and radiographic bone fill in Intra Oral Peri-Apical radiograph. RESULTS: The healing of defects was uneventful and free of any biological complications. The gain in relative attachment level, reduction of probing pocket depth, and bone fill was statistically significant in all four groups. BG and BG-HA synthetic bone graft implanted sites showed significant bone fill (P<0.05) than hydroxyapatite and unimplanted control sites. CONCLUSION: The performance of BG and its composite was better compared to HA and open flap debridement alone for the reconstruction of infrabony defects. The BG-HA composite particles may effectively be used as an alternative bone graft material for infrabony defects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3459506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34595062012-10-09 Effects of bioactive glass, hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass – Hydroxyapatite composite graft particles in the treatment of infrabony defects Mistry, Surajit Kundu, Debabrata Datta, Someswar Basu, Debabrata J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: Several synthetic alloplastic materials have been used in the past as an implant in infrabony defects with a goal to reconstruct the lost part of attachment apparatus via new osseous tissue formation. The present study was undertaken to evaluate and compare clinico-radiographically, the effect of bioactive glass (BG), hydroxyapatite (HA), and BG-HA composite bone graft particles in the treatment of human infra-bony periodontal defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Indigenous synthetic HA, BG, and BG-HA composite bone graft materials were developed in the laboratory. Twenty eight infrabony periodontal defects were equally distributed (i.e., seven defects) into four groups. The defects were treated separately with three types of graft materials and non-grafted manner (open flap debridement alone, control) to evaluate both the soft and hard tissue responses after six months of surgery. Evaluation was done by studying different parameters such as plaque index, gingival index, relative attachment level, probing pocket depth, and radiographic bone fill in Intra Oral Peri-Apical radiograph. RESULTS: The healing of defects was uneventful and free of any biological complications. The gain in relative attachment level, reduction of probing pocket depth, and bone fill was statistically significant in all four groups. BG and BG-HA synthetic bone graft implanted sites showed significant bone fill (P<0.05) than hydroxyapatite and unimplanted control sites. CONCLUSION: The performance of BG and its composite was better compared to HA and open flap debridement alone for the reconstruction of infrabony defects. The BG-HA composite particles may effectively be used as an alternative bone graft material for infrabony defects. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3459506/ /pubmed/23055592 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.99269 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mistry, Surajit
Kundu, Debabrata
Datta, Someswar
Basu, Debabrata
Effects of bioactive glass, hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass – Hydroxyapatite composite graft particles in the treatment of infrabony defects
title Effects of bioactive glass, hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass – Hydroxyapatite composite graft particles in the treatment of infrabony defects
title_full Effects of bioactive glass, hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass – Hydroxyapatite composite graft particles in the treatment of infrabony defects
title_fullStr Effects of bioactive glass, hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass – Hydroxyapatite composite graft particles in the treatment of infrabony defects
title_full_unstemmed Effects of bioactive glass, hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass – Hydroxyapatite composite graft particles in the treatment of infrabony defects
title_short Effects of bioactive glass, hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass – Hydroxyapatite composite graft particles in the treatment of infrabony defects
title_sort effects of bioactive glass, hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass – hydroxyapatite composite graft particles in the treatment of infrabony defects
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23055592
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.99269
work_keys_str_mv AT mistrysurajit effectsofbioactiveglasshydroxyapatiteandbioactiveglasshydroxyapatitecompositegraftparticlesinthetreatmentofinfrabonydefects
AT kundudebabrata effectsofbioactiveglasshydroxyapatiteandbioactiveglasshydroxyapatitecompositegraftparticlesinthetreatmentofinfrabonydefects
AT dattasomeswar effectsofbioactiveglasshydroxyapatiteandbioactiveglasshydroxyapatitecompositegraftparticlesinthetreatmentofinfrabonydefects
AT basudebabrata effectsofbioactiveglasshydroxyapatiteandbioactiveglasshydroxyapatitecompositegraftparticlesinthetreatmentofinfrabonydefects