Cargando…
Nutritional screening of older home-dwelling Norwegians: a comparison between two instruments
BACKGROUND: It is important to obtain knowledge about the prevalence of nutritional risk and associated factors among older home-dwelling people in order to be able to meet nutritional challenges in this group in the future and to plan appropriate interventions. The aim of this survey was to investi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23049250 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S35986 |
_version_ | 1782244820586070016 |
---|---|
author | Söderhamn, Ulrika Dale, Bjørg Sundsli, Kari Söderhamn, Olle |
author_facet | Söderhamn, Ulrika Dale, Bjørg Sundsli, Kari Söderhamn, Olle |
author_sort | Söderhamn, Ulrika |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It is important to obtain knowledge about the prevalence of nutritional risk and associated factors among older home-dwelling people in order to be able to meet nutritional challenges in this group in the future and to plan appropriate interventions. The aim of this survey was to investigate the prevalence of home-dwelling older people at nutritional risk and to identify associated factors using two different nutritional screening instruments as self-report instruments. METHODS: This study had a cross-sectional design. A postal questionnaire, including the Norwegian versions of the Nutritional Form for the Elderly (NUFFE-NO) and Mini Nutritional Assessment – Short Form (MNA-SF), background variables, and health-related questions was sent to a randomized sample of 6033 home-dwelling older people in southern Norway. A total of 2106 (34.9%) subjects were included in the study. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: When using the NUFFE-NO and MNA-SF, 426 (22.3%) and 258 (13.5%) older persons, respectively, were identified to be at nutritional risk. The risk of undernutrition increased with age. Several predictors for being at risk of undernutrition, including chronic disease/handicap and receiving family help, as well as protective factors, including sufficient food intake and having social contacts, were identified. CONCLUSION: Health professionals must be aware of older people’s vulnerability to risk of undernutrition, perform screening, and have a plan for preventing under-nutrition. For that purpose, MNA-SF and NUFFE-NO can be suggested for screening older people living at home. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3459573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34595732012-10-05 Nutritional screening of older home-dwelling Norwegians: a comparison between two instruments Söderhamn, Ulrika Dale, Bjørg Sundsli, Kari Söderhamn, Olle Clin Interv Aging Original Research BACKGROUND: It is important to obtain knowledge about the prevalence of nutritional risk and associated factors among older home-dwelling people in order to be able to meet nutritional challenges in this group in the future and to plan appropriate interventions. The aim of this survey was to investigate the prevalence of home-dwelling older people at nutritional risk and to identify associated factors using two different nutritional screening instruments as self-report instruments. METHODS: This study had a cross-sectional design. A postal questionnaire, including the Norwegian versions of the Nutritional Form for the Elderly (NUFFE-NO) and Mini Nutritional Assessment – Short Form (MNA-SF), background variables, and health-related questions was sent to a randomized sample of 6033 home-dwelling older people in southern Norway. A total of 2106 (34.9%) subjects were included in the study. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: When using the NUFFE-NO and MNA-SF, 426 (22.3%) and 258 (13.5%) older persons, respectively, were identified to be at nutritional risk. The risk of undernutrition increased with age. Several predictors for being at risk of undernutrition, including chronic disease/handicap and receiving family help, as well as protective factors, including sufficient food intake and having social contacts, were identified. CONCLUSION: Health professionals must be aware of older people’s vulnerability to risk of undernutrition, perform screening, and have a plan for preventing under-nutrition. For that purpose, MNA-SF and NUFFE-NO can be suggested for screening older people living at home. Dove Medical Press 2012 2012-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3459573/ /pubmed/23049250 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S35986 Text en © 2012 Söderhamn et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Söderhamn, Ulrika Dale, Bjørg Sundsli, Kari Söderhamn, Olle Nutritional screening of older home-dwelling Norwegians: a comparison between two instruments |
title | Nutritional screening of older home-dwelling Norwegians: a comparison between two instruments |
title_full | Nutritional screening of older home-dwelling Norwegians: a comparison between two instruments |
title_fullStr | Nutritional screening of older home-dwelling Norwegians: a comparison between two instruments |
title_full_unstemmed | Nutritional screening of older home-dwelling Norwegians: a comparison between two instruments |
title_short | Nutritional screening of older home-dwelling Norwegians: a comparison between two instruments |
title_sort | nutritional screening of older home-dwelling norwegians: a comparison between two instruments |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23049250 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S35986 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soderhamnulrika nutritionalscreeningofolderhomedwellingnorwegiansacomparisonbetweentwoinstruments AT dalebjørg nutritionalscreeningofolderhomedwellingnorwegiansacomparisonbetweentwoinstruments AT sundslikari nutritionalscreeningofolderhomedwellingnorwegiansacomparisonbetweentwoinstruments AT soderhamnolle nutritionalscreeningofolderhomedwellingnorwegiansacomparisonbetweentwoinstruments |