Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of delapril/indapamide compared to different ACE-inhibitor/hydrochlorothiazide combinations: a meta-analysis

The main objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of the combination of delapril and indapamide (D+I) to different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combinations for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. A secondary objective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Circelli, Maria, Nicolini, Gabriele, Egan, Colin G, Cremonesi, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23049265
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S35220
_version_ 1782244837088559104
author Circelli, Maria
Nicolini, Gabriele
Egan, Colin G
Cremonesi, Giovanni
author_facet Circelli, Maria
Nicolini, Gabriele
Egan, Colin G
Cremonesi, Giovanni
author_sort Circelli, Maria
collection PubMed
description The main objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of the combination of delapril and indapamide (D+I) to different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combinations for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. A secondary objective was to examine the safety of these two combinations. Studies comparing the efficacy of D+I to ACEi+HCTZ combinations in hypertensive patients and published on computerized databases (1974–2010) were considered. Endpoints included percentage of normalized patients, of responders, change in diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP/SBP) at different time-points, percentage of adverse events (AEs), and percentage of withdrawal. Four head-to-head randomized controlled trials (D+I-treated, n = 643; ACEi+HCTZ-treated, n = 629) were included. Meta-analysis indicated that D+I-treated patients had a higher proportion with normalized blood pressure (P = 0.024) or responders (P = 0.002) compared to ACEi+HCTZ-treated patients. No difference was observed between treatments on absolute values of DBP and SBP at different time-points. Although the rate of patients reporting at least one AE was similar in both groups (10.4% versus 9.9%), events leading to study withdrawal were lower in the D+I group versus the ACEi+HCTZ group (2.3% versus 4.8%, respectively; P = 0.018). This meta-analysis suggests that treatment with D+I could provide a higher proportion of normalized or responder patients with good tolerability compared to ACEi+HCTZ combinations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3459665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34596652012-10-03 Efficacy and safety of delapril/indapamide compared to different ACE-inhibitor/hydrochlorothiazide combinations: a meta-analysis Circelli, Maria Nicolini, Gabriele Egan, Colin G Cremonesi, Giovanni Int J Gen Med Original Research The main objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of the combination of delapril and indapamide (D+I) to different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combinations for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. A secondary objective was to examine the safety of these two combinations. Studies comparing the efficacy of D+I to ACEi+HCTZ combinations in hypertensive patients and published on computerized databases (1974–2010) were considered. Endpoints included percentage of normalized patients, of responders, change in diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP/SBP) at different time-points, percentage of adverse events (AEs), and percentage of withdrawal. Four head-to-head randomized controlled trials (D+I-treated, n = 643; ACEi+HCTZ-treated, n = 629) were included. Meta-analysis indicated that D+I-treated patients had a higher proportion with normalized blood pressure (P = 0.024) or responders (P = 0.002) compared to ACEi+HCTZ-treated patients. No difference was observed between treatments on absolute values of DBP and SBP at different time-points. Although the rate of patients reporting at least one AE was similar in both groups (10.4% versus 9.9%), events leading to study withdrawal were lower in the D+I group versus the ACEi+HCTZ group (2.3% versus 4.8%, respectively; P = 0.018). This meta-analysis suggests that treatment with D+I could provide a higher proportion of normalized or responder patients with good tolerability compared to ACEi+HCTZ combinations. Dove Medical Press 2012-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3459665/ /pubmed/23049265 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S35220 Text en © 2012 Circelli et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Circelli, Maria
Nicolini, Gabriele
Egan, Colin G
Cremonesi, Giovanni
Efficacy and safety of delapril/indapamide compared to different ACE-inhibitor/hydrochlorothiazide combinations: a meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of delapril/indapamide compared to different ACE-inhibitor/hydrochlorothiazide combinations: a meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of delapril/indapamide compared to different ACE-inhibitor/hydrochlorothiazide combinations: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of delapril/indapamide compared to different ACE-inhibitor/hydrochlorothiazide combinations: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of delapril/indapamide compared to different ACE-inhibitor/hydrochlorothiazide combinations: a meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of delapril/indapamide compared to different ACE-inhibitor/hydrochlorothiazide combinations: a meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of delapril/indapamide compared to different ace-inhibitor/hydrochlorothiazide combinations: a meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23049265
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S35220
work_keys_str_mv AT circellimaria efficacyandsafetyofdelaprilindapamidecomparedtodifferentaceinhibitorhydrochlorothiazidecombinationsametaanalysis
AT nicolinigabriele efficacyandsafetyofdelaprilindapamidecomparedtodifferentaceinhibitorhydrochlorothiazidecombinationsametaanalysis
AT egancoling efficacyandsafetyofdelaprilindapamidecomparedtodifferentaceinhibitorhydrochlorothiazidecombinationsametaanalysis
AT cremonesigiovanni efficacyandsafetyofdelaprilindapamidecomparedtodifferentaceinhibitorhydrochlorothiazidecombinationsametaanalysis