Cargando…

Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization

Next generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled high throughput discovery of somatic mutations. Detection depends on experimental design, lab platforms, parameters and analysis algorithms. However, NGS-based somatic mutation detection is prone to erroneous calls, with reported validation rates near 54%...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Löwer, Martin, Renard, Bernhard Y., de Graaf, Jos, Wagner, Meike, Paret, Claudia, Kneip, Christoph, Türeci, Özlem, Diken, Mustafa, Britten, Cedrik, Kreiter, Sebastian, Koslowski, Michael, Castle, John C., Sahin, Ugur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23028300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002714
_version_ 1782244875666718720
author Löwer, Martin
Renard, Bernhard Y.
de Graaf, Jos
Wagner, Meike
Paret, Claudia
Kneip, Christoph
Türeci, Özlem
Diken, Mustafa
Britten, Cedrik
Kreiter, Sebastian
Koslowski, Michael
Castle, John C.
Sahin, Ugur
author_facet Löwer, Martin
Renard, Bernhard Y.
de Graaf, Jos
Wagner, Meike
Paret, Claudia
Kneip, Christoph
Türeci, Özlem
Diken, Mustafa
Britten, Cedrik
Kreiter, Sebastian
Koslowski, Michael
Castle, John C.
Sahin, Ugur
author_sort Löwer, Martin
collection PubMed
description Next generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled high throughput discovery of somatic mutations. Detection depends on experimental design, lab platforms, parameters and analysis algorithms. However, NGS-based somatic mutation detection is prone to erroneous calls, with reported validation rates near 54% and congruence between algorithms less than 50%. Here, we developed an algorithm to assign a single statistic, a false discovery rate (FDR), to each somatic mutation identified by NGS. This FDR confidence value accurately discriminates true mutations from erroneous calls. Using sequencing data generated from triplicate exome profiling of C57BL/6 mice and B16-F10 melanoma cells, we used the existing algorithms GATK, SAMtools and SomaticSNiPer to identify somatic mutations. For each identified mutation, our algorithm assigned an FDR. We selected 139 mutations for validation, including 50 somatic mutations assigned a low FDR (high confidence) and 44 mutations assigned a high FDR (low confidence). All of the high confidence somatic mutations validated (50 of 50), none of the 44 low confidence somatic mutations validated, and 15 of 45 mutations with an intermediate FDR validated. Furthermore, the assignment of a single FDR to individual mutations enables statistical comparisons of lab and computation methodologies, including ROC curves and AUC metrics. Using the HiSeq 2000, single end 50 nt reads from replicates generate the highest confidence somatic mutation call set.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3459886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34598862012-10-01 Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization Löwer, Martin Renard, Bernhard Y. de Graaf, Jos Wagner, Meike Paret, Claudia Kneip, Christoph Türeci, Özlem Diken, Mustafa Britten, Cedrik Kreiter, Sebastian Koslowski, Michael Castle, John C. Sahin, Ugur PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Next generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled high throughput discovery of somatic mutations. Detection depends on experimental design, lab platforms, parameters and analysis algorithms. However, NGS-based somatic mutation detection is prone to erroneous calls, with reported validation rates near 54% and congruence between algorithms less than 50%. Here, we developed an algorithm to assign a single statistic, a false discovery rate (FDR), to each somatic mutation identified by NGS. This FDR confidence value accurately discriminates true mutations from erroneous calls. Using sequencing data generated from triplicate exome profiling of C57BL/6 mice and B16-F10 melanoma cells, we used the existing algorithms GATK, SAMtools and SomaticSNiPer to identify somatic mutations. For each identified mutation, our algorithm assigned an FDR. We selected 139 mutations for validation, including 50 somatic mutations assigned a low FDR (high confidence) and 44 mutations assigned a high FDR (low confidence). All of the high confidence somatic mutations validated (50 of 50), none of the 44 low confidence somatic mutations validated, and 15 of 45 mutations with an intermediate FDR validated. Furthermore, the assignment of a single FDR to individual mutations enables statistical comparisons of lab and computation methodologies, including ROC curves and AUC metrics. Using the HiSeq 2000, single end 50 nt reads from replicates generate the highest confidence somatic mutation call set. Public Library of Science 2012-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3459886/ /pubmed/23028300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002714 Text en © 2012 Löwer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Löwer, Martin
Renard, Bernhard Y.
de Graaf, Jos
Wagner, Meike
Paret, Claudia
Kneip, Christoph
Türeci, Özlem
Diken, Mustafa
Britten, Cedrik
Kreiter, Sebastian
Koslowski, Michael
Castle, John C.
Sahin, Ugur
Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization
title Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization
title_full Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization
title_fullStr Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization
title_full_unstemmed Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization
title_short Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization
title_sort confidence-based somatic mutation evaluation and prioritization
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23028300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002714
work_keys_str_mv AT lowermartin confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT renardbernhardy confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT degraafjos confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT wagnermeike confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT paretclaudia confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT kneipchristoph confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT tureciozlem confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT dikenmustafa confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT brittencedrik confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT kreitersebastian confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT koslowskimichael confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT castlejohnc confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT sahinugur confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization