Cargando…
Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization
Next generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled high throughput discovery of somatic mutations. Detection depends on experimental design, lab platforms, parameters and analysis algorithms. However, NGS-based somatic mutation detection is prone to erroneous calls, with reported validation rates near 54%...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23028300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002714 |
_version_ | 1782244875666718720 |
---|---|
author | Löwer, Martin Renard, Bernhard Y. de Graaf, Jos Wagner, Meike Paret, Claudia Kneip, Christoph Türeci, Özlem Diken, Mustafa Britten, Cedrik Kreiter, Sebastian Koslowski, Michael Castle, John C. Sahin, Ugur |
author_facet | Löwer, Martin Renard, Bernhard Y. de Graaf, Jos Wagner, Meike Paret, Claudia Kneip, Christoph Türeci, Özlem Diken, Mustafa Britten, Cedrik Kreiter, Sebastian Koslowski, Michael Castle, John C. Sahin, Ugur |
author_sort | Löwer, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Next generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled high throughput discovery of somatic mutations. Detection depends on experimental design, lab platforms, parameters and analysis algorithms. However, NGS-based somatic mutation detection is prone to erroneous calls, with reported validation rates near 54% and congruence between algorithms less than 50%. Here, we developed an algorithm to assign a single statistic, a false discovery rate (FDR), to each somatic mutation identified by NGS. This FDR confidence value accurately discriminates true mutations from erroneous calls. Using sequencing data generated from triplicate exome profiling of C57BL/6 mice and B16-F10 melanoma cells, we used the existing algorithms GATK, SAMtools and SomaticSNiPer to identify somatic mutations. For each identified mutation, our algorithm assigned an FDR. We selected 139 mutations for validation, including 50 somatic mutations assigned a low FDR (high confidence) and 44 mutations assigned a high FDR (low confidence). All of the high confidence somatic mutations validated (50 of 50), none of the 44 low confidence somatic mutations validated, and 15 of 45 mutations with an intermediate FDR validated. Furthermore, the assignment of a single FDR to individual mutations enables statistical comparisons of lab and computation methodologies, including ROC curves and AUC metrics. Using the HiSeq 2000, single end 50 nt reads from replicates generate the highest confidence somatic mutation call set. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3459886 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34598862012-10-01 Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization Löwer, Martin Renard, Bernhard Y. de Graaf, Jos Wagner, Meike Paret, Claudia Kneip, Christoph Türeci, Özlem Diken, Mustafa Britten, Cedrik Kreiter, Sebastian Koslowski, Michael Castle, John C. Sahin, Ugur PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Next generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled high throughput discovery of somatic mutations. Detection depends on experimental design, lab platforms, parameters and analysis algorithms. However, NGS-based somatic mutation detection is prone to erroneous calls, with reported validation rates near 54% and congruence between algorithms less than 50%. Here, we developed an algorithm to assign a single statistic, a false discovery rate (FDR), to each somatic mutation identified by NGS. This FDR confidence value accurately discriminates true mutations from erroneous calls. Using sequencing data generated from triplicate exome profiling of C57BL/6 mice and B16-F10 melanoma cells, we used the existing algorithms GATK, SAMtools and SomaticSNiPer to identify somatic mutations. For each identified mutation, our algorithm assigned an FDR. We selected 139 mutations for validation, including 50 somatic mutations assigned a low FDR (high confidence) and 44 mutations assigned a high FDR (low confidence). All of the high confidence somatic mutations validated (50 of 50), none of the 44 low confidence somatic mutations validated, and 15 of 45 mutations with an intermediate FDR validated. Furthermore, the assignment of a single FDR to individual mutations enables statistical comparisons of lab and computation methodologies, including ROC curves and AUC metrics. Using the HiSeq 2000, single end 50 nt reads from replicates generate the highest confidence somatic mutation call set. Public Library of Science 2012-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3459886/ /pubmed/23028300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002714 Text en © 2012 Löwer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Löwer, Martin Renard, Bernhard Y. de Graaf, Jos Wagner, Meike Paret, Claudia Kneip, Christoph Türeci, Özlem Diken, Mustafa Britten, Cedrik Kreiter, Sebastian Koslowski, Michael Castle, John C. Sahin, Ugur Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization |
title | Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization |
title_full | Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization |
title_fullStr | Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization |
title_full_unstemmed | Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization |
title_short | Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization |
title_sort | confidence-based somatic mutation evaluation and prioritization |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23028300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002714 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lowermartin confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization AT renardbernhardy confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization AT degraafjos confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization AT wagnermeike confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization AT paretclaudia confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization AT kneipchristoph confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization AT tureciozlem confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization AT dikenmustafa confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization AT brittencedrik confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization AT kreitersebastian confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization AT koslowskimichael confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization AT castlejohnc confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization AT sahinugur confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization |