Cargando…

Anthropogenic Influences on Conservation Values of White Rhinoceros

White rhinoceros (rhinos) is a keystone conservation species and also provides revenue for protection agencies. Restoring or mimicking the outcomes of impeded ecological processes allows reconciliation of biodiversity and financial objectives. We evaluate the consequences of white rhino management r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferreira, Sam M., Botha, Judith M., Emmett, Megan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23029354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045989
_version_ 1782244889714491392
author Ferreira, Sam M.
Botha, Judith M.
Emmett, Megan C.
author_facet Ferreira, Sam M.
Botha, Judith M.
Emmett, Megan C.
author_sort Ferreira, Sam M.
collection PubMed
description White rhinoceros (rhinos) is a keystone conservation species and also provides revenue for protection agencies. Restoring or mimicking the outcomes of impeded ecological processes allows reconciliation of biodiversity and financial objectives. We evaluate the consequences of white rhino management removal, and in recent times, poaching, on population persistence, regional conservation outcomes and opportunities for revenue generation. In Kruger National Park, white rhinos increased from 1998 to 2008. Since then the population may vary non-directionally. In 2010, we estimated 10,621 (95% CI: 8,767–12,682) white rhinos using three different population estimation methods. The desired management effect of a varying population was detectable after 2008. Age and sex structures in sink areas (focal rhino capture areas) were different from elsewhere. This comes from relatively more sub-adults being removed by managers than what the standing age distribution defined. Poachers in turn focused on more adults in 2011. Although the effect of poaching was not detectable at the population level given the confidence intervals of estimates, managers accommodated expected poaching annually and adapted management removals. The present poaching trend predicts that 432 white rhinos may be poached in Kruger during 2012. The white rhino management model mimicking outcomes of impeded ecological processes predicts 397 rhino management removals are required. At present poachers may be doing “management removals,” but conservationists have no opportunity left to contribute to regional rhino conservation strategies or generate revenue through white rhino sales. In addition, continued trends in poaching predict detectable white rhino declines in Kruger National Park by 2016. Our results suggest that conservationists need innovative approaches that reduce financial incentives to curb the threats that poaching poses to several conservation values of natural resources such as white rhinos.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3459945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34599452012-10-01 Anthropogenic Influences on Conservation Values of White Rhinoceros Ferreira, Sam M. Botha, Judith M. Emmett, Megan C. PLoS One Research Article White rhinoceros (rhinos) is a keystone conservation species and also provides revenue for protection agencies. Restoring or mimicking the outcomes of impeded ecological processes allows reconciliation of biodiversity and financial objectives. We evaluate the consequences of white rhino management removal, and in recent times, poaching, on population persistence, regional conservation outcomes and opportunities for revenue generation. In Kruger National Park, white rhinos increased from 1998 to 2008. Since then the population may vary non-directionally. In 2010, we estimated 10,621 (95% CI: 8,767–12,682) white rhinos using three different population estimation methods. The desired management effect of a varying population was detectable after 2008. Age and sex structures in sink areas (focal rhino capture areas) were different from elsewhere. This comes from relatively more sub-adults being removed by managers than what the standing age distribution defined. Poachers in turn focused on more adults in 2011. Although the effect of poaching was not detectable at the population level given the confidence intervals of estimates, managers accommodated expected poaching annually and adapted management removals. The present poaching trend predicts that 432 white rhinos may be poached in Kruger during 2012. The white rhino management model mimicking outcomes of impeded ecological processes predicts 397 rhino management removals are required. At present poachers may be doing “management removals,” but conservationists have no opportunity left to contribute to regional rhino conservation strategies or generate revenue through white rhino sales. In addition, continued trends in poaching predict detectable white rhino declines in Kruger National Park by 2016. Our results suggest that conservationists need innovative approaches that reduce financial incentives to curb the threats that poaching poses to several conservation values of natural resources such as white rhinos. Public Library of Science 2012-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3459945/ /pubmed/23029354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045989 Text en © 2012 Ferreira et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ferreira, Sam M.
Botha, Judith M.
Emmett, Megan C.
Anthropogenic Influences on Conservation Values of White Rhinoceros
title Anthropogenic Influences on Conservation Values of White Rhinoceros
title_full Anthropogenic Influences on Conservation Values of White Rhinoceros
title_fullStr Anthropogenic Influences on Conservation Values of White Rhinoceros
title_full_unstemmed Anthropogenic Influences on Conservation Values of White Rhinoceros
title_short Anthropogenic Influences on Conservation Values of White Rhinoceros
title_sort anthropogenic influences on conservation values of white rhinoceros
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23029354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045989
work_keys_str_mv AT ferreirasamm anthropogenicinfluencesonconservationvaluesofwhiterhinoceros
AT bothajudithm anthropogenicinfluencesonconservationvaluesofwhiterhinoceros
AT emmettmeganc anthropogenicinfluencesonconservationvaluesofwhiterhinoceros