Cargando…

Differences between uni- and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the level of agreement between behavioral and multidimensional pain assessment scales in term newborn infants submitted to an acute nociceptive stimulus. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 400 healthy term newborns who received an intramus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca, Guinsburg, Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23070343
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08
_version_ 1782244906474930176
author Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca
Guinsburg, Ruth
author_facet Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca
Guinsburg, Ruth
author_sort Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the level of agreement between behavioral and multidimensional pain assessment scales in term newborn infants submitted to an acute nociceptive stimulus. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 400 healthy term newborns who received an intramuscular injection of vitamin K during the first 6 hours of life. Two behavioral pain scales (the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain) and one multidimensional tool (the Premature Infant Pain Profile) were applied by a single observer before the procedure, during cleansing, during injection and two minutes after injection. The Cochran Q, McNemar and kappa tests were used to compare the presence and degree of agreement between the three scales. The Hotelling T2 test was used to compare the groups of newborns for which the scales showed agreement or disagreement. A generalized linear regression was used to compare the results of the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain across the four study time points. RESULTS: The neonates studied had a gestational age of 39±1 weeks, a birth weight of 3169±316 g and and postnatal age of 67±45 minutes. During the stimulus procedure, 80% of the newborns exhibited pain behaviors according to the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain, and 70% experienced pain according to the Premature Infant Pain Profile (p<0.001). The frequencies of the detection of pain using the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain and the Neonatal Facial Coding System were similar. The characteristics of the neonates were not associated with the level of agreement between the scales. CONCLUSION: The Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain behavioral scales are more sensitive for the identification of pain in healthy term newborn infants than the multidimensional Premature Infant Pain Profile scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3460019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34600192012-10-01 Differences between uni- and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca Guinsburg, Ruth Clinics (Sao Paulo) Clinical Science OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the level of agreement between behavioral and multidimensional pain assessment scales in term newborn infants submitted to an acute nociceptive stimulus. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 400 healthy term newborns who received an intramuscular injection of vitamin K during the first 6 hours of life. Two behavioral pain scales (the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain) and one multidimensional tool (the Premature Infant Pain Profile) were applied by a single observer before the procedure, during cleansing, during injection and two minutes after injection. The Cochran Q, McNemar and kappa tests were used to compare the presence and degree of agreement between the three scales. The Hotelling T2 test was used to compare the groups of newborns for which the scales showed agreement or disagreement. A generalized linear regression was used to compare the results of the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain across the four study time points. RESULTS: The neonates studied had a gestational age of 39±1 weeks, a birth weight of 3169±316 g and and postnatal age of 67±45 minutes. During the stimulus procedure, 80% of the newborns exhibited pain behaviors according to the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain, and 70% experienced pain according to the Premature Infant Pain Profile (p<0.001). The frequencies of the detection of pain using the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain and the Neonatal Facial Coding System were similar. The characteristics of the neonates were not associated with the level of agreement between the scales. CONCLUSION: The Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain behavioral scales are more sensitive for the identification of pain in healthy term newborn infants than the multidimensional Premature Infant Pain Profile scale. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2012-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3460019/ /pubmed/23070343 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08 Text en Copyright © 2012 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca
Guinsburg, Ruth
Differences between uni- and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
title Differences between uni- and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
title_full Differences between uni- and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
title_fullStr Differences between uni- and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
title_full_unstemmed Differences between uni- and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
title_short Differences between uni- and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
title_sort differences between uni- and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23070343
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08
work_keys_str_mv AT ariasmariacarmenzacuenca differencesbetweenuniandmultidimensionalscalesforassessingpainintermnewborninfantsatthebedside
AT guinsburgruth differencesbetweenuniandmultidimensionalscalesforassessingpainintermnewborninfantsatthebedside