Cargando…
Accuracy of single progesterone test to predict early pregnancy outcome in women with pain or bleeding: meta-analysis of cohort studies
Objective To determine the accuracy with which a single progesterone measurement in early pregnancy discriminates between viable and non-viable pregnancy. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Data sources Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, ProQuest, Confer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23045257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6077 |
_version_ | 1782244931142680576 |
---|---|
author | Verhaegen, Jorine Gallos, Ioannis D van Mello, Norah M Abdel-Aziz, Mohamed Takwoingi, Yemisi Harb, Hoda Deeks, Jonathan J Mol, Ben W J Coomarasamy, Arri |
author_facet | Verhaegen, Jorine Gallos, Ioannis D van Mello, Norah M Abdel-Aziz, Mohamed Takwoingi, Yemisi Harb, Hoda Deeks, Jonathan J Mol, Ben W J Coomarasamy, Arri |
author_sort | Verhaegen, Jorine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To determine the accuracy with which a single progesterone measurement in early pregnancy discriminates between viable and non-viable pregnancy. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Data sources Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, ProQuest, Conference Proceedings Citation Index, and the Cochrane Library from inception until April 2012, plus reference lists of relevant studies. Study selection Studies were selected on the basis of participants (women with spontaneous pregnancy of less than 14 weeks of gestation); test (single serum progesterone measurement); outcome (viable intrauterine pregnancy, miscarriage, or ectopic pregnancy) diagnosed on the basis of combinations of pregnancy test, ultrasound scan, laparoscopy, and histological examination; design (cohort studies of test accuracy); and sufficient data being reported. Results 26 cohort studies, including 9436 pregnant women, were included, consisting of 7 studies in women with symptoms and inconclusive ultrasound assessment and 19 studies in women with symptoms alone. Among women with symptoms and inconclusive ultrasound assessments, the progesterone test (5 studies with 1998 participants and cut-off values from 3.2 to 6 ng/mL) predicted a non-viable pregnancy with pooled sensitivity of 74.6% (95% confidence interval 50.6% to 89.4%), specificity of 98.4% (90.9% to 99.7%), positive likelihood ratio of 45 (7.1 to 289), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.26 (0.12 to 0.57). The median prevalence of a non-viable pregnancy was 73.2%, and the probability of a non-viable pregnancy was raised to 99.2% if the progesterone was low. For women with symptoms alone, the progesterone test had a higher specificity when a threshold of 10 ng/mL was used (9 studies with 4689 participants) and predicted a non-viable pregnancy with pooled sensitivity of 66.5% (53.6% to 77.4%), specificity of 96.3% (91.1% to 98.5%), positive likelihood ratio of 18 (7.2 to 45), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.35 (0.24 to 0.50). The probability of a non-viable pregnancy was raised from 62.9% to 96.8%. Conclusion A single progesterone measurement for women in early pregnancy presenting with bleeding or pain and inconclusive ultrasound assessments can rule out a viable pregnancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3460254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34602542012-10-01 Accuracy of single progesterone test to predict early pregnancy outcome in women with pain or bleeding: meta-analysis of cohort studies Verhaegen, Jorine Gallos, Ioannis D van Mello, Norah M Abdel-Aziz, Mohamed Takwoingi, Yemisi Harb, Hoda Deeks, Jonathan J Mol, Ben W J Coomarasamy, Arri BMJ Research Objective To determine the accuracy with which a single progesterone measurement in early pregnancy discriminates between viable and non-viable pregnancy. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Data sources Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, ProQuest, Conference Proceedings Citation Index, and the Cochrane Library from inception until April 2012, plus reference lists of relevant studies. Study selection Studies were selected on the basis of participants (women with spontaneous pregnancy of less than 14 weeks of gestation); test (single serum progesterone measurement); outcome (viable intrauterine pregnancy, miscarriage, or ectopic pregnancy) diagnosed on the basis of combinations of pregnancy test, ultrasound scan, laparoscopy, and histological examination; design (cohort studies of test accuracy); and sufficient data being reported. Results 26 cohort studies, including 9436 pregnant women, were included, consisting of 7 studies in women with symptoms and inconclusive ultrasound assessment and 19 studies in women with symptoms alone. Among women with symptoms and inconclusive ultrasound assessments, the progesterone test (5 studies with 1998 participants and cut-off values from 3.2 to 6 ng/mL) predicted a non-viable pregnancy with pooled sensitivity of 74.6% (95% confidence interval 50.6% to 89.4%), specificity of 98.4% (90.9% to 99.7%), positive likelihood ratio of 45 (7.1 to 289), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.26 (0.12 to 0.57). The median prevalence of a non-viable pregnancy was 73.2%, and the probability of a non-viable pregnancy was raised to 99.2% if the progesterone was low. For women with symptoms alone, the progesterone test had a higher specificity when a threshold of 10 ng/mL was used (9 studies with 4689 participants) and predicted a non-viable pregnancy with pooled sensitivity of 66.5% (53.6% to 77.4%), specificity of 96.3% (91.1% to 98.5%), positive likelihood ratio of 18 (7.2 to 45), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.35 (0.24 to 0.50). The probability of a non-viable pregnancy was raised from 62.9% to 96.8%. Conclusion A single progesterone measurement for women in early pregnancy presenting with bleeding or pain and inconclusive ultrasound assessments can rule out a viable pregnancy. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3460254/ /pubmed/23045257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6077 Text en © Verhaegen et al 2012 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Research Verhaegen, Jorine Gallos, Ioannis D van Mello, Norah M Abdel-Aziz, Mohamed Takwoingi, Yemisi Harb, Hoda Deeks, Jonathan J Mol, Ben W J Coomarasamy, Arri Accuracy of single progesterone test to predict early pregnancy outcome in women with pain or bleeding: meta-analysis of cohort studies |
title | Accuracy of single progesterone test to predict early pregnancy outcome in women with pain or bleeding: meta-analysis of cohort studies |
title_full | Accuracy of single progesterone test to predict early pregnancy outcome in women with pain or bleeding: meta-analysis of cohort studies |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of single progesterone test to predict early pregnancy outcome in women with pain or bleeding: meta-analysis of cohort studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of single progesterone test to predict early pregnancy outcome in women with pain or bleeding: meta-analysis of cohort studies |
title_short | Accuracy of single progesterone test to predict early pregnancy outcome in women with pain or bleeding: meta-analysis of cohort studies |
title_sort | accuracy of single progesterone test to predict early pregnancy outcome in women with pain or bleeding: meta-analysis of cohort studies |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23045257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verhaegenjorine accuracyofsingleprogesteronetesttopredictearlypregnancyoutcomeinwomenwithpainorbleedingmetaanalysisofcohortstudies AT gallosioannisd accuracyofsingleprogesteronetesttopredictearlypregnancyoutcomeinwomenwithpainorbleedingmetaanalysisofcohortstudies AT vanmellonorahm accuracyofsingleprogesteronetesttopredictearlypregnancyoutcomeinwomenwithpainorbleedingmetaanalysisofcohortstudies AT abdelazizmohamed accuracyofsingleprogesteronetesttopredictearlypregnancyoutcomeinwomenwithpainorbleedingmetaanalysisofcohortstudies AT takwoingiyemisi accuracyofsingleprogesteronetesttopredictearlypregnancyoutcomeinwomenwithpainorbleedingmetaanalysisofcohortstudies AT harbhoda accuracyofsingleprogesteronetesttopredictearlypregnancyoutcomeinwomenwithpainorbleedingmetaanalysisofcohortstudies AT deeksjonathanj accuracyofsingleprogesteronetesttopredictearlypregnancyoutcomeinwomenwithpainorbleedingmetaanalysisofcohortstudies AT molbenwj accuracyofsingleprogesteronetesttopredictearlypregnancyoutcomeinwomenwithpainorbleedingmetaanalysisofcohortstudies AT coomarasamyarri accuracyofsingleprogesteronetesttopredictearlypregnancyoutcomeinwomenwithpainorbleedingmetaanalysisofcohortstudies |