Cargando…

Prognostic factors in radical cystectomy affecting survival

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic factors in radical cystectomy affecting survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 100 hundred patients were included in the study. Incontinent diversion was applied to 73 of these, and continent diversion to 27. Prospective and retro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aglamis, Erdogan, Toktas, Gokhan, Unluer, Erdinc, Tasdemir, Cemal, Ceylan, Cavit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23056076
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2012.30288
_version_ 1782244946462375936
author Aglamis, Erdogan
Toktas, Gokhan
Unluer, Erdinc
Tasdemir, Cemal
Ceylan, Cavit
author_facet Aglamis, Erdogan
Toktas, Gokhan
Unluer, Erdinc
Tasdemir, Cemal
Ceylan, Cavit
author_sort Aglamis, Erdogan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic factors in radical cystectomy affecting survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 100 hundred patients were included in the study. Incontinent diversion was applied to 73 of these, and continent diversion to 27. Prospective and retrospective data of the patients were examined. The prognostic value for survival was evaluated for of lymph node involvement, tumor grade (low grade: grade 0-II, high grade: ≥ III or epidermoid carcinoma), tumor stage (low stage: stage pT0-2, high stage: stage ≥ 3a pT3a), presence of preoperative unilateral of bilateral hydronephrosis, presence of preoperative uremia (serum urea value: ≤ 60), and age (> 70 and ≤ 70 years of age) on survival were investigated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Log-Rank statistical methods were used in the study. RESULTS: Grade, stage, uremia, and lymph node involvement had significant effects on survival (p values 0.0002, 0.03, 0.01, and 0.02, respectively). Presence of preoperative hydronephrosis and age had no statistically significant effects on survival (p values 0.8 and 0.2, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor grade, tumor stage, preoperative uremia, and lymph node involvement are prognostic factors affecting survival. Advanced age and presence of preoperative hydronephrosis have no prognostic value for survival. The presence of uremia in the preoperative assessment of the patients is more important than hydronephrosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3460501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34605012012-10-09 Prognostic factors in radical cystectomy affecting survival Aglamis, Erdogan Toktas, Gokhan Unluer, Erdinc Tasdemir, Cemal Ceylan, Cavit Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic factors in radical cystectomy affecting survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 100 hundred patients were included in the study. Incontinent diversion was applied to 73 of these, and continent diversion to 27. Prospective and retrospective data of the patients were examined. The prognostic value for survival was evaluated for of lymph node involvement, tumor grade (low grade: grade 0-II, high grade: ≥ III or epidermoid carcinoma), tumor stage (low stage: stage pT0-2, high stage: stage ≥ 3a pT3a), presence of preoperative unilateral of bilateral hydronephrosis, presence of preoperative uremia (serum urea value: ≤ 60), and age (> 70 and ≤ 70 years of age) on survival were investigated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Log-Rank statistical methods were used in the study. RESULTS: Grade, stage, uremia, and lymph node involvement had significant effects on survival (p values 0.0002, 0.03, 0.01, and 0.02, respectively). Presence of preoperative hydronephrosis and age had no statistically significant effects on survival (p values 0.8 and 0.2, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor grade, tumor stage, preoperative uremia, and lymph node involvement are prognostic factors affecting survival. Advanced age and presence of preoperative hydronephrosis have no prognostic value for survival. The presence of uremia in the preoperative assessment of the patients is more important than hydronephrosis. Termedia Publishing House 2012-09-08 2012-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3460501/ /pubmed/23056076 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2012.30288 Text en Copyright © 2012 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Aglamis, Erdogan
Toktas, Gokhan
Unluer, Erdinc
Tasdemir, Cemal
Ceylan, Cavit
Prognostic factors in radical cystectomy affecting survival
title Prognostic factors in radical cystectomy affecting survival
title_full Prognostic factors in radical cystectomy affecting survival
title_fullStr Prognostic factors in radical cystectomy affecting survival
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic factors in radical cystectomy affecting survival
title_short Prognostic factors in radical cystectomy affecting survival
title_sort prognostic factors in radical cystectomy affecting survival
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23056076
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2012.30288
work_keys_str_mv AT aglamiserdogan prognosticfactorsinradicalcystectomyaffectingsurvival
AT toktasgokhan prognosticfactorsinradicalcystectomyaffectingsurvival
AT unluererdinc prognosticfactorsinradicalcystectomyaffectingsurvival
AT tasdemircemal prognosticfactorsinradicalcystectomyaffectingsurvival
AT ceylancavit prognosticfactorsinradicalcystectomyaffectingsurvival