Cargando…
A comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal V2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques
Whole cell recordings (WCRs) are frequently used to study neuronal properties, but may be problematic when studying neuromodulatory responses, due to dialysis of the cell's cytoplasm. Perforated patch recordings (PPR) avoid cellular dialysis and might reveal additional modulatory effects that a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23060747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2012.00039 |
_version_ | 1782244949746515968 |
---|---|
author | Dietz, Shelby Husch, Andreas Harris-Warrick, Ronald M. |
author_facet | Dietz, Shelby Husch, Andreas Harris-Warrick, Ronald M. |
author_sort | Dietz, Shelby |
collection | PubMed |
description | Whole cell recordings (WCRs) are frequently used to study neuronal properties, but may be problematic when studying neuromodulatory responses, due to dialysis of the cell's cytoplasm. Perforated patch recordings (PPR) avoid cellular dialysis and might reveal additional modulatory effects that are lost during WCR. We have previously used WCR to characterize the responses of the V2a class of Chx10-expressing neurons to serotonin (5-HT) in the neonatal mouse spinal cord (Zhong et al., 2010). Here we directly compare multiple aspects of the responses to 5-HT using WCR and PPR in Chx10-eCFP neurons in spinal cord slices from 2 to 4 day old mice. Cellular properties recorded in PPR and WCR were similar, but high-quality PP recordings could be maintained for significantly longer. Both WCR and PPR cells could respond to 5-HT, and although neurons recorded by PPR showed a significantly greater response to 5-HT in some parameters, the absolute differences between PPR and WCR were small. We conclude that WCR is an acceptable recording method for short-term recordings of neuromodulatory effects, but the less invasive PPR is preferable for detailed analyses and is necessary for stable recordings lasting an hour or more. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3460530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34605302012-10-11 A comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal V2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques Dietz, Shelby Husch, Andreas Harris-Warrick, Ronald M. Front Cell Neurosci Neuroscience Whole cell recordings (WCRs) are frequently used to study neuronal properties, but may be problematic when studying neuromodulatory responses, due to dialysis of the cell's cytoplasm. Perforated patch recordings (PPR) avoid cellular dialysis and might reveal additional modulatory effects that are lost during WCR. We have previously used WCR to characterize the responses of the V2a class of Chx10-expressing neurons to serotonin (5-HT) in the neonatal mouse spinal cord (Zhong et al., 2010). Here we directly compare multiple aspects of the responses to 5-HT using WCR and PPR in Chx10-eCFP neurons in spinal cord slices from 2 to 4 day old mice. Cellular properties recorded in PPR and WCR were similar, but high-quality PP recordings could be maintained for significantly longer. Both WCR and PPR cells could respond to 5-HT, and although neurons recorded by PPR showed a significantly greater response to 5-HT in some parameters, the absolute differences between PPR and WCR were small. We conclude that WCR is an acceptable recording method for short-term recordings of neuromodulatory effects, but the less invasive PPR is preferable for detailed analyses and is necessary for stable recordings lasting an hour or more. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3460530/ /pubmed/23060747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2012.00039 Text en Copyright © 2012 Dietz, Husch and Harris-Warrick. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Dietz, Shelby Husch, Andreas Harris-Warrick, Ronald M. A comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal V2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques |
title | A comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal V2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques |
title_full | A comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal V2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques |
title_fullStr | A comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal V2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal V2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques |
title_short | A comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal V2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques |
title_sort | comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal v2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23060747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2012.00039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dietzshelby acomparisonofserotoninneuromodulationofmousespinalv2ainterneuronsusingperforatedpatchandwholecellrecordingtechniques AT huschandreas acomparisonofserotoninneuromodulationofmousespinalv2ainterneuronsusingperforatedpatchandwholecellrecordingtechniques AT harriswarrickronaldm acomparisonofserotoninneuromodulationofmousespinalv2ainterneuronsusingperforatedpatchandwholecellrecordingtechniques AT dietzshelby comparisonofserotoninneuromodulationofmousespinalv2ainterneuronsusingperforatedpatchandwholecellrecordingtechniques AT huschandreas comparisonofserotoninneuromodulationofmousespinalv2ainterneuronsusingperforatedpatchandwholecellrecordingtechniques AT harriswarrickronaldm comparisonofserotoninneuromodulationofmousespinalv2ainterneuronsusingperforatedpatchandwholecellrecordingtechniques |