Cargando…

A comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal V2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques

Whole cell recordings (WCRs) are frequently used to study neuronal properties, but may be problematic when studying neuromodulatory responses, due to dialysis of the cell's cytoplasm. Perforated patch recordings (PPR) avoid cellular dialysis and might reveal additional modulatory effects that a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dietz, Shelby, Husch, Andreas, Harris-Warrick, Ronald M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23060747
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2012.00039
_version_ 1782244949746515968
author Dietz, Shelby
Husch, Andreas
Harris-Warrick, Ronald M.
author_facet Dietz, Shelby
Husch, Andreas
Harris-Warrick, Ronald M.
author_sort Dietz, Shelby
collection PubMed
description Whole cell recordings (WCRs) are frequently used to study neuronal properties, but may be problematic when studying neuromodulatory responses, due to dialysis of the cell's cytoplasm. Perforated patch recordings (PPR) avoid cellular dialysis and might reveal additional modulatory effects that are lost during WCR. We have previously used WCR to characterize the responses of the V2a class of Chx10-expressing neurons to serotonin (5-HT) in the neonatal mouse spinal cord (Zhong et al., 2010). Here we directly compare multiple aspects of the responses to 5-HT using WCR and PPR in Chx10-eCFP neurons in spinal cord slices from 2 to 4 day old mice. Cellular properties recorded in PPR and WCR were similar, but high-quality PP recordings could be maintained for significantly longer. Both WCR and PPR cells could respond to 5-HT, and although neurons recorded by PPR showed a significantly greater response to 5-HT in some parameters, the absolute differences between PPR and WCR were small. We conclude that WCR is an acceptable recording method for short-term recordings of neuromodulatory effects, but the less invasive PPR is preferable for detailed analyses and is necessary for stable recordings lasting an hour or more.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3460530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34605302012-10-11 A comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal V2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques Dietz, Shelby Husch, Andreas Harris-Warrick, Ronald M. Front Cell Neurosci Neuroscience Whole cell recordings (WCRs) are frequently used to study neuronal properties, but may be problematic when studying neuromodulatory responses, due to dialysis of the cell's cytoplasm. Perforated patch recordings (PPR) avoid cellular dialysis and might reveal additional modulatory effects that are lost during WCR. We have previously used WCR to characterize the responses of the V2a class of Chx10-expressing neurons to serotonin (5-HT) in the neonatal mouse spinal cord (Zhong et al., 2010). Here we directly compare multiple aspects of the responses to 5-HT using WCR and PPR in Chx10-eCFP neurons in spinal cord slices from 2 to 4 day old mice. Cellular properties recorded in PPR and WCR were similar, but high-quality PP recordings could be maintained for significantly longer. Both WCR and PPR cells could respond to 5-HT, and although neurons recorded by PPR showed a significantly greater response to 5-HT in some parameters, the absolute differences between PPR and WCR were small. We conclude that WCR is an acceptable recording method for short-term recordings of neuromodulatory effects, but the less invasive PPR is preferable for detailed analyses and is necessary for stable recordings lasting an hour or more. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3460530/ /pubmed/23060747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2012.00039 Text en Copyright © 2012 Dietz, Husch and Harris-Warrick. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Dietz, Shelby
Husch, Andreas
Harris-Warrick, Ronald M.
A comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal V2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques
title A comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal V2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques
title_full A comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal V2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques
title_fullStr A comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal V2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal V2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques
title_short A comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal V2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques
title_sort comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal v2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23060747
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2012.00039
work_keys_str_mv AT dietzshelby acomparisonofserotoninneuromodulationofmousespinalv2ainterneuronsusingperforatedpatchandwholecellrecordingtechniques
AT huschandreas acomparisonofserotoninneuromodulationofmousespinalv2ainterneuronsusingperforatedpatchandwholecellrecordingtechniques
AT harriswarrickronaldm acomparisonofserotoninneuromodulationofmousespinalv2ainterneuronsusingperforatedpatchandwholecellrecordingtechniques
AT dietzshelby comparisonofserotoninneuromodulationofmousespinalv2ainterneuronsusingperforatedpatchandwholecellrecordingtechniques
AT huschandreas comparisonofserotoninneuromodulationofmousespinalv2ainterneuronsusingperforatedpatchandwholecellrecordingtechniques
AT harriswarrickronaldm comparisonofserotoninneuromodulationofmousespinalv2ainterneuronsusingperforatedpatchandwholecellrecordingtechniques