Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of coenzyme Q10-loaded liposomes and solid lipid nanoparticles as dermal antioxidant carriers

BACKGROUND: The effective delivery of coenzyme Q10 (Q10) to the skin has several benefits in therapy for different skin pathologies. However, the delivery of Q10 to deeper layers of skin is challenging due to low aqueous solubility of Q10. Liposomes and solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) have many adva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gokce, Evren H, Korkmaz, Emrah, Tuncay-Tanrıverdi, Sakine, Dellera, Eleonora, Sandri, Giuseppina, Bonferoni, M Cristina, Ozer, Ozgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23055723
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S34921
_version_ 1782244965369249792
author Gokce, Evren H
Korkmaz, Emrah
Tuncay-Tanrıverdi, Sakine
Dellera, Eleonora
Sandri, Giuseppina
Bonferoni, M Cristina
Ozer, Ozgen
author_facet Gokce, Evren H
Korkmaz, Emrah
Tuncay-Tanrıverdi, Sakine
Dellera, Eleonora
Sandri, Giuseppina
Bonferoni, M Cristina
Ozer, Ozgen
author_sort Gokce, Evren H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effective delivery of coenzyme Q10 (Q10) to the skin has several benefits in therapy for different skin pathologies. However, the delivery of Q10 to deeper layers of skin is challenging due to low aqueous solubility of Q10. Liposomes and solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) have many advantages to accomplish the requirements in topical drug delivery. This study aims to evaluate the influence of these nanosystems on the effective delivery of Q10 into the skin. METHODS: Q10-loaded liposomes (LIPO-Q10) and SLNs (SLN-Q10) were prepared by thin film hydration and high shear homogenization methods, respectively. Particle size (PS), polydispersity index (PI), zeta potential (ZP), and drug entrapment efficiency were determined. Differential scanning calorimetry analysis and morphological transmission electron microscopy (TEM) examination were conducted. Biocompatibility/cytotoxicity studies of Q10-loaded nanosystems were performed by means of cell culture (human fibroblasts) under oxidative conditions. The protective effect of formulations against production of reactive oxygen species were comparatively evaluated by cytofluorometry studies. RESULTS: PS of uniform SLN-Q10 and LIPO-Q10 were determined as 152.4 ± 7.9 nm and 301.1 ± 8.2 nm, respectively. ZPs were −13.67 ± 1.32 mV and −36.6 ± 0.85 mV in the same order. The drug entrapment efficiency was 15% higher in SLN systems. TEM studies confirmed the colloidal size. SLN-Q10 and LIPO-Q10 showed biocompatibility towards fibroblasts up to 50 μM of Q10, which was determined as suitable for cell proliferation. The mean fluorescence intensity % depending on ROS production determined in cytofluorometric studies could be listed as Q10 ≥ SLN-Q10 > LIPO-Q10. CONCLUSION: The LIPO-Q10 system was able to enhance cell proliferation. On the contrary, SLN-Q10 did not show protective effects against ROS accumulation. As a conclusion, liposomes seem to have advantages over SLN in terms of effective delivery of Q10 to skin for antioxidant purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3460677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34606772012-10-09 A comparative evaluation of coenzyme Q10-loaded liposomes and solid lipid nanoparticles as dermal antioxidant carriers Gokce, Evren H Korkmaz, Emrah Tuncay-Tanrıverdi, Sakine Dellera, Eleonora Sandri, Giuseppina Bonferoni, M Cristina Ozer, Ozgen Int J Nanomedicine Original Research BACKGROUND: The effective delivery of coenzyme Q10 (Q10) to the skin has several benefits in therapy for different skin pathologies. However, the delivery of Q10 to deeper layers of skin is challenging due to low aqueous solubility of Q10. Liposomes and solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) have many advantages to accomplish the requirements in topical drug delivery. This study aims to evaluate the influence of these nanosystems on the effective delivery of Q10 into the skin. METHODS: Q10-loaded liposomes (LIPO-Q10) and SLNs (SLN-Q10) were prepared by thin film hydration and high shear homogenization methods, respectively. Particle size (PS), polydispersity index (PI), zeta potential (ZP), and drug entrapment efficiency were determined. Differential scanning calorimetry analysis and morphological transmission electron microscopy (TEM) examination were conducted. Biocompatibility/cytotoxicity studies of Q10-loaded nanosystems were performed by means of cell culture (human fibroblasts) under oxidative conditions. The protective effect of formulations against production of reactive oxygen species were comparatively evaluated by cytofluorometry studies. RESULTS: PS of uniform SLN-Q10 and LIPO-Q10 were determined as 152.4 ± 7.9 nm and 301.1 ± 8.2 nm, respectively. ZPs were −13.67 ± 1.32 mV and −36.6 ± 0.85 mV in the same order. The drug entrapment efficiency was 15% higher in SLN systems. TEM studies confirmed the colloidal size. SLN-Q10 and LIPO-Q10 showed biocompatibility towards fibroblasts up to 50 μM of Q10, which was determined as suitable for cell proliferation. The mean fluorescence intensity % depending on ROS production determined in cytofluorometric studies could be listed as Q10 ≥ SLN-Q10 > LIPO-Q10. CONCLUSION: The LIPO-Q10 system was able to enhance cell proliferation. On the contrary, SLN-Q10 did not show protective effects against ROS accumulation. As a conclusion, liposomes seem to have advantages over SLN in terms of effective delivery of Q10 to skin for antioxidant purposes. Dove Medical Press 2012 2012-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3460677/ /pubmed/23055723 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S34921 Text en © 2012 Gokce et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gokce, Evren H
Korkmaz, Emrah
Tuncay-Tanrıverdi, Sakine
Dellera, Eleonora
Sandri, Giuseppina
Bonferoni, M Cristina
Ozer, Ozgen
A comparative evaluation of coenzyme Q10-loaded liposomes and solid lipid nanoparticles as dermal antioxidant carriers
title A comparative evaluation of coenzyme Q10-loaded liposomes and solid lipid nanoparticles as dermal antioxidant carriers
title_full A comparative evaluation of coenzyme Q10-loaded liposomes and solid lipid nanoparticles as dermal antioxidant carriers
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of coenzyme Q10-loaded liposomes and solid lipid nanoparticles as dermal antioxidant carriers
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of coenzyme Q10-loaded liposomes and solid lipid nanoparticles as dermal antioxidant carriers
title_short A comparative evaluation of coenzyme Q10-loaded liposomes and solid lipid nanoparticles as dermal antioxidant carriers
title_sort comparative evaluation of coenzyme q10-loaded liposomes and solid lipid nanoparticles as dermal antioxidant carriers
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23055723
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S34921
work_keys_str_mv AT gokceevrenh acomparativeevaluationofcoenzymeq10loadedliposomesandsolidlipidnanoparticlesasdermalantioxidantcarriers
AT korkmazemrah acomparativeevaluationofcoenzymeq10loadedliposomesandsolidlipidnanoparticlesasdermalantioxidantcarriers
AT tuncaytanrıverdisakine acomparativeevaluationofcoenzymeq10loadedliposomesandsolidlipidnanoparticlesasdermalantioxidantcarriers
AT delleraeleonora acomparativeevaluationofcoenzymeq10loadedliposomesandsolidlipidnanoparticlesasdermalantioxidantcarriers
AT sandrigiuseppina acomparativeevaluationofcoenzymeq10loadedliposomesandsolidlipidnanoparticlesasdermalantioxidantcarriers
AT bonferonimcristina acomparativeevaluationofcoenzymeq10loadedliposomesandsolidlipidnanoparticlesasdermalantioxidantcarriers
AT ozerozgen acomparativeevaluationofcoenzymeq10loadedliposomesandsolidlipidnanoparticlesasdermalantioxidantcarriers
AT gokceevrenh comparativeevaluationofcoenzymeq10loadedliposomesandsolidlipidnanoparticlesasdermalantioxidantcarriers
AT korkmazemrah comparativeevaluationofcoenzymeq10loadedliposomesandsolidlipidnanoparticlesasdermalantioxidantcarriers
AT tuncaytanrıverdisakine comparativeevaluationofcoenzymeq10loadedliposomesandsolidlipidnanoparticlesasdermalantioxidantcarriers
AT delleraeleonora comparativeevaluationofcoenzymeq10loadedliposomesandsolidlipidnanoparticlesasdermalantioxidantcarriers
AT sandrigiuseppina comparativeevaluationofcoenzymeq10loadedliposomesandsolidlipidnanoparticlesasdermalantioxidantcarriers
AT bonferonimcristina comparativeevaluationofcoenzymeq10loadedliposomesandsolidlipidnanoparticlesasdermalantioxidantcarriers
AT ozerozgen comparativeevaluationofcoenzymeq10loadedliposomesandsolidlipidnanoparticlesasdermalantioxidantcarriers