Cargando…
Diagnostic and economic evaluation of new biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: the research protocol of a prospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: New research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have recently been developed to enable an early diagnosis of AD pathophysiology by relying on emerging biomarkers. To enable efficient allocation of health care resources, evidence is needed to support decision makers on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22883691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-12-72 |
_version_ | 1782244978379980800 |
---|---|
author | Handels, Ron LH Aalten, Pauline Wolfs, Claire AG OldeRikkert, Marcel Scheltens, Philip Visser, Pieter Jelle Joore, Manuela A Severens, Johan L Verhey, Frans RJ |
author_facet | Handels, Ron LH Aalten, Pauline Wolfs, Claire AG OldeRikkert, Marcel Scheltens, Philip Visser, Pieter Jelle Joore, Manuela A Severens, Johan L Verhey, Frans RJ |
author_sort | Handels, Ron LH |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: New research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have recently been developed to enable an early diagnosis of AD pathophysiology by relying on emerging biomarkers. To enable efficient allocation of health care resources, evidence is needed to support decision makers on the adoption of emerging biomarkers in clinical practice. The research goals are to 1) assess the diagnostic test accuracy of current clinical diagnostic work-up and emerging biomarkers in MRI, PET and CSF, 2) perform a cost-consequence analysis and 3) assess long-term cost-effectiveness by an economic model. METHODS/DESIGN: In a cohort design 241 consecutive patients suspected of having a primary neurodegenerative disease are approached in four academic memory clinics and followed for two years. Clinical data and data on quality of life, costs and emerging biomarkers are gathered. Diagnostic test accuracy is determined by relating the clinical practice and new research criteria diagnoses to a reference diagnosis. The clinical practice diagnosis at baseline is reflected by a consensus procedure among experts using clinical information only (no biomarkers). The diagnosis based on the new research criteria is reflected by decision rules that combine clinical and biomarker information. The reference diagnosis is determined by a consensus procedure among experts based on clinical information on the course of symptoms over a two-year time period. A decision analytic model is built combining available evidence from different resources among which (accuracy) results from the study, literature and expert opinion to assess long-term cost-effectiveness of the emerging biomarkers. DISCUSSION: Several other multi-centre trials study the relative value of new biomarkers for early evaluation of AD and related disorders. The uniqueness of this study is the assessment of resource utilization and quality of life to enable an economic evaluation. The study results are generalizable to a population of patients who are referred to a memory clinic due to their memory problems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01450891 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3460756 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34607562012-09-29 Diagnostic and economic evaluation of new biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: the research protocol of a prospective cohort study Handels, Ron LH Aalten, Pauline Wolfs, Claire AG OldeRikkert, Marcel Scheltens, Philip Visser, Pieter Jelle Joore, Manuela A Severens, Johan L Verhey, Frans RJ BMC Neurol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: New research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have recently been developed to enable an early diagnosis of AD pathophysiology by relying on emerging biomarkers. To enable efficient allocation of health care resources, evidence is needed to support decision makers on the adoption of emerging biomarkers in clinical practice. The research goals are to 1) assess the diagnostic test accuracy of current clinical diagnostic work-up and emerging biomarkers in MRI, PET and CSF, 2) perform a cost-consequence analysis and 3) assess long-term cost-effectiveness by an economic model. METHODS/DESIGN: In a cohort design 241 consecutive patients suspected of having a primary neurodegenerative disease are approached in four academic memory clinics and followed for two years. Clinical data and data on quality of life, costs and emerging biomarkers are gathered. Diagnostic test accuracy is determined by relating the clinical practice and new research criteria diagnoses to a reference diagnosis. The clinical practice diagnosis at baseline is reflected by a consensus procedure among experts using clinical information only (no biomarkers). The diagnosis based on the new research criteria is reflected by decision rules that combine clinical and biomarker information. The reference diagnosis is determined by a consensus procedure among experts based on clinical information on the course of symptoms over a two-year time period. A decision analytic model is built combining available evidence from different resources among which (accuracy) results from the study, literature and expert opinion to assess long-term cost-effectiveness of the emerging biomarkers. DISCUSSION: Several other multi-centre trials study the relative value of new biomarkers for early evaluation of AD and related disorders. The uniqueness of this study is the assessment of resource utilization and quality of life to enable an economic evaluation. The study results are generalizable to a population of patients who are referred to a memory clinic due to their memory problems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01450891 BioMed Central 2012-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3460756/ /pubmed/22883691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-12-72 Text en Copyright ©2012 Handels et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Handels, Ron LH Aalten, Pauline Wolfs, Claire AG OldeRikkert, Marcel Scheltens, Philip Visser, Pieter Jelle Joore, Manuela A Severens, Johan L Verhey, Frans RJ Diagnostic and economic evaluation of new biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: the research protocol of a prospective cohort study |
title | Diagnostic and economic evaluation of new biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: the research protocol of a prospective cohort study |
title_full | Diagnostic and economic evaluation of new biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: the research protocol of a prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic and economic evaluation of new biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: the research protocol of a prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic and economic evaluation of new biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: the research protocol of a prospective cohort study |
title_short | Diagnostic and economic evaluation of new biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: the research protocol of a prospective cohort study |
title_sort | diagnostic and economic evaluation of new biomarkers for alzheimer’s disease: the research protocol of a prospective cohort study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22883691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-12-72 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT handelsronlh diagnosticandeconomicevaluationofnewbiomarkersforalzheimersdiseasetheresearchprotocolofaprospectivecohortstudy AT aaltenpauline diagnosticandeconomicevaluationofnewbiomarkersforalzheimersdiseasetheresearchprotocolofaprospectivecohortstudy AT wolfsclaireag diagnosticandeconomicevaluationofnewbiomarkersforalzheimersdiseasetheresearchprotocolofaprospectivecohortstudy AT olderikkertmarcel diagnosticandeconomicevaluationofnewbiomarkersforalzheimersdiseasetheresearchprotocolofaprospectivecohortstudy AT scheltensphilip diagnosticandeconomicevaluationofnewbiomarkersforalzheimersdiseasetheresearchprotocolofaprospectivecohortstudy AT visserpieterjelle diagnosticandeconomicevaluationofnewbiomarkersforalzheimersdiseasetheresearchprotocolofaprospectivecohortstudy AT jooremanuelaa diagnosticandeconomicevaluationofnewbiomarkersforalzheimersdiseasetheresearchprotocolofaprospectivecohortstudy AT severensjohanl diagnosticandeconomicevaluationofnewbiomarkersforalzheimersdiseasetheresearchprotocolofaprospectivecohortstudy AT verheyfransrj diagnosticandeconomicevaluationofnewbiomarkersforalzheimersdiseasetheresearchprotocolofaprospectivecohortstudy |