Cargando…

Detection of BK virus in urine from renal transplant subjects by mass spectrometry

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and management of BK virus (BKV) reactivation following renal transplantation continues to be a significant clinical problem. Following reactivation of latent virus, impaired cellular immunity enables sustained viral replication to occur in urothelial cells, which potential...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Konietzny, Rebecca, Fischer, Roman, Ternette, Nicola, Wright, Cynthia A, Turney, Ben W, Chakera, Aron, Hughes, David, Kessler, Benedikt M, Pugh, Chris W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22537312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1559-0275-9-4
_version_ 1782244979336282112
author Konietzny, Rebecca
Fischer, Roman
Ternette, Nicola
Wright, Cynthia A
Turney, Ben W
Chakera, Aron
Hughes, David
Kessler, Benedikt M
Pugh, Chris W
author_facet Konietzny, Rebecca
Fischer, Roman
Ternette, Nicola
Wright, Cynthia A
Turney, Ben W
Chakera, Aron
Hughes, David
Kessler, Benedikt M
Pugh, Chris W
author_sort Konietzny, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and management of BK virus (BKV) reactivation following renal transplantation continues to be a significant clinical problem. Following reactivation of latent virus, impaired cellular immunity enables sustained viral replication to occur in urothelial cells, which potentially leads to the development of BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN). Current guidelines recommend regular surveillance for BKV reactivation through the detection of infected urothelial cells in urine (decoy cells) or viral nucleic acid in urine or blood. However, these methods have variable sensitivity and cannot routinely distinguish between different viral subtypes. We therefore asked whether mass spectrometry might be able to overcome these limitations and provide an additional non-invasive technique for the surveillance of BKV and identification of recipients at increased risk of BKVAN. RESULTS: Here we describe a mass spectrometry (MS)-based method for the detection of BKV derived proteins directly isolated from clinical urine samples. Peptides detected by MS derived from Viral Protein 1 (VP1) allowed differentiation between subtypes I and IV. Using this approach, we observed an association between higher decoy cell numbers and the presence of the VP1 subtype Ib-2 in urine samples derived from a cohort of 20 renal transplant recipients, consistent with the hypothesis that certain viral subtypes may be associated with more severe BKVAN. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to identify BK virus proteins in clinical samples by MS and that this approach makes it possible to distinguish between different viral subtypes. Further studies are required to establish whether this information could lead to stratification of patients at risk of BKVAN, facilitate distinction between BKVAN and acute rejection (AR), and ultimately improve patient treatment and outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3460760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34607602012-10-02 Detection of BK virus in urine from renal transplant subjects by mass spectrometry Konietzny, Rebecca Fischer, Roman Ternette, Nicola Wright, Cynthia A Turney, Ben W Chakera, Aron Hughes, David Kessler, Benedikt M Pugh, Chris W Clin Proteomics Research BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and management of BK virus (BKV) reactivation following renal transplantation continues to be a significant clinical problem. Following reactivation of latent virus, impaired cellular immunity enables sustained viral replication to occur in urothelial cells, which potentially leads to the development of BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN). Current guidelines recommend regular surveillance for BKV reactivation through the detection of infected urothelial cells in urine (decoy cells) or viral nucleic acid in urine or blood. However, these methods have variable sensitivity and cannot routinely distinguish between different viral subtypes. We therefore asked whether mass spectrometry might be able to overcome these limitations and provide an additional non-invasive technique for the surveillance of BKV and identification of recipients at increased risk of BKVAN. RESULTS: Here we describe a mass spectrometry (MS)-based method for the detection of BKV derived proteins directly isolated from clinical urine samples. Peptides detected by MS derived from Viral Protein 1 (VP1) allowed differentiation between subtypes I and IV. Using this approach, we observed an association between higher decoy cell numbers and the presence of the VP1 subtype Ib-2 in urine samples derived from a cohort of 20 renal transplant recipients, consistent with the hypothesis that certain viral subtypes may be associated with more severe BKVAN. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to identify BK virus proteins in clinical samples by MS and that this approach makes it possible to distinguish between different viral subtypes. Further studies are required to establish whether this information could lead to stratification of patients at risk of BKVAN, facilitate distinction between BKVAN and acute rejection (AR), and ultimately improve patient treatment and outcomes. Springer 2012-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3460760/ /pubmed/22537312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1559-0275-9-4 Text en Copyright ©2012 Konietzny et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Konietzny, Rebecca
Fischer, Roman
Ternette, Nicola
Wright, Cynthia A
Turney, Ben W
Chakera, Aron
Hughes, David
Kessler, Benedikt M
Pugh, Chris W
Detection of BK virus in urine from renal transplant subjects by mass spectrometry
title Detection of BK virus in urine from renal transplant subjects by mass spectrometry
title_full Detection of BK virus in urine from renal transplant subjects by mass spectrometry
title_fullStr Detection of BK virus in urine from renal transplant subjects by mass spectrometry
title_full_unstemmed Detection of BK virus in urine from renal transplant subjects by mass spectrometry
title_short Detection of BK virus in urine from renal transplant subjects by mass spectrometry
title_sort detection of bk virus in urine from renal transplant subjects by mass spectrometry
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22537312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1559-0275-9-4
work_keys_str_mv AT konietznyrebecca detectionofbkvirusinurinefromrenaltransplantsubjectsbymassspectrometry
AT fischerroman detectionofbkvirusinurinefromrenaltransplantsubjectsbymassspectrometry
AT ternettenicola detectionofbkvirusinurinefromrenaltransplantsubjectsbymassspectrometry
AT wrightcynthiaa detectionofbkvirusinurinefromrenaltransplantsubjectsbymassspectrometry
AT turneybenw detectionofbkvirusinurinefromrenaltransplantsubjectsbymassspectrometry
AT chakeraaron detectionofbkvirusinurinefromrenaltransplantsubjectsbymassspectrometry
AT hughesdavid detectionofbkvirusinurinefromrenaltransplantsubjectsbymassspectrometry
AT kesslerbenediktm detectionofbkvirusinurinefromrenaltransplantsubjectsbymassspectrometry
AT pughchrisw detectionofbkvirusinurinefromrenaltransplantsubjectsbymassspectrometry