Cargando…
Peer Review of Grant Applications: Criteria Used and Qualitative Study of Reviewer Practices
BACKGROUND: Peer review of grant applications has been criticized as lacking reliability. Studies showing poor agreement among reviewers supported this possibility but usually focused on reviewers’ scores and failed to investigate reasons for disagreement. Here, our goal was to determine how reviewe...
Autores principales: | Abdoul, Hendy, Perrey, Christophe, Amiel, Philippe, Tubach, Florence, Gottot, Serge, Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle, Alberti, Corinne |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23029386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046054 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Non-Financial Conflicts of Interest in Academic Grant Evaluation: A Qualitative Study of Multiple Stakeholders in France
por: Abdoul, Hendy, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Expert Opinions on Web-Based Peer Education Interventions for Youth Sexual Health Promotion: Qualitative Study
por: Martin, Philippe, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Young people’s proposals for a web-based intervention for sexual health promotion: a French qualitative study
por: Martin, Philippe, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices
por: Conix, Stijn, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Transparent Peer Review of Grant Applications
por: Lee, Jung Hun, et al.
Publicado: (2021)