Cargando…

Genomic regions in crop–wild hybrids of lettuce are affected differently in different environments: implications for crop breeding

Many crops contain domestication genes that are generally considered to lower fitness of crop–wild hybrids in the wild environment. Transgenes placed in close linkage with such genes would be less likely to spread into a wild population. Therefore, for environmental risk assessment of GM crops, it i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartman, Yorike, Hooftman, Danny A P, Uwimana, Brigitte, van de Wiel, Clemens C M, Smulders, Marinus J M, Visser, Richard G F, van Tienderen, Peter H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3461145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23028403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00240.x
_version_ 1782245042525569024
author Hartman, Yorike
Hooftman, Danny A P
Uwimana, Brigitte
van de Wiel, Clemens C M
Smulders, Marinus J M
Visser, Richard G F
van Tienderen, Peter H
author_facet Hartman, Yorike
Hooftman, Danny A P
Uwimana, Brigitte
van de Wiel, Clemens C M
Smulders, Marinus J M
Visser, Richard G F
van Tienderen, Peter H
author_sort Hartman, Yorike
collection PubMed
description Many crops contain domestication genes that are generally considered to lower fitness of crop–wild hybrids in the wild environment. Transgenes placed in close linkage with such genes would be less likely to spread into a wild population. Therefore, for environmental risk assessment of GM crops, it is important to know whether genomic regions with such genes exist, and how they affect fitness. We performed quantitative trait loci (QTL) analyses on fitness(-related) traits in two different field environments employing recombinant inbred lines from a cross between cultivated Lactuca sativa and its wild relative Lactuca serriola. We identified a region on linkage group 5 where the crop allele consistently conferred a selective advantage (increasing fitness to 212% and 214%), whereas on linkage group 7, a region conferred a selective disadvantage (reducing fitness to 26% and 5%), mainly through delaying flowering. The probability for a putative transgene spreading would therefore depend strongly on the insertion location. Comparison of these field results with greenhouse data from a previous study using the same lines showed considerable differences in QTL patterns. This indicates that care should be taken when extrapolating experiments from the greenhouse, and that the impact of domestication genes has to be assessed under field conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3461145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34611452012-10-01 Genomic regions in crop–wild hybrids of lettuce are affected differently in different environments: implications for crop breeding Hartman, Yorike Hooftman, Danny A P Uwimana, Brigitte van de Wiel, Clemens C M Smulders, Marinus J M Visser, Richard G F van Tienderen, Peter H Evol Appl Original Articles Many crops contain domestication genes that are generally considered to lower fitness of crop–wild hybrids in the wild environment. Transgenes placed in close linkage with such genes would be less likely to spread into a wild population. Therefore, for environmental risk assessment of GM crops, it is important to know whether genomic regions with such genes exist, and how they affect fitness. We performed quantitative trait loci (QTL) analyses on fitness(-related) traits in two different field environments employing recombinant inbred lines from a cross between cultivated Lactuca sativa and its wild relative Lactuca serriola. We identified a region on linkage group 5 where the crop allele consistently conferred a selective advantage (increasing fitness to 212% and 214%), whereas on linkage group 7, a region conferred a selective disadvantage (reducing fitness to 26% and 5%), mainly through delaying flowering. The probability for a putative transgene spreading would therefore depend strongly on the insertion location. Comparison of these field results with greenhouse data from a previous study using the same lines showed considerable differences in QTL patterns. This indicates that care should be taken when extrapolating experiments from the greenhouse, and that the impact of domestication genes has to be assessed under field conditions. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012-09 2012-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3461145/ /pubmed/23028403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00240.x Text en © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hartman, Yorike
Hooftman, Danny A P
Uwimana, Brigitte
van de Wiel, Clemens C M
Smulders, Marinus J M
Visser, Richard G F
van Tienderen, Peter H
Genomic regions in crop–wild hybrids of lettuce are affected differently in different environments: implications for crop breeding
title Genomic regions in crop–wild hybrids of lettuce are affected differently in different environments: implications for crop breeding
title_full Genomic regions in crop–wild hybrids of lettuce are affected differently in different environments: implications for crop breeding
title_fullStr Genomic regions in crop–wild hybrids of lettuce are affected differently in different environments: implications for crop breeding
title_full_unstemmed Genomic regions in crop–wild hybrids of lettuce are affected differently in different environments: implications for crop breeding
title_short Genomic regions in crop–wild hybrids of lettuce are affected differently in different environments: implications for crop breeding
title_sort genomic regions in crop–wild hybrids of lettuce are affected differently in different environments: implications for crop breeding
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3461145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23028403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00240.x
work_keys_str_mv AT hartmanyorike genomicregionsincropwildhybridsoflettuceareaffecteddifferentlyindifferentenvironmentsimplicationsforcropbreeding
AT hooftmandannyap genomicregionsincropwildhybridsoflettuceareaffecteddifferentlyindifferentenvironmentsimplicationsforcropbreeding
AT uwimanabrigitte genomicregionsincropwildhybridsoflettuceareaffecteddifferentlyindifferentenvironmentsimplicationsforcropbreeding
AT vandewielclemenscm genomicregionsincropwildhybridsoflettuceareaffecteddifferentlyindifferentenvironmentsimplicationsforcropbreeding
AT smuldersmarinusjm genomicregionsincropwildhybridsoflettuceareaffecteddifferentlyindifferentenvironmentsimplicationsforcropbreeding
AT visserrichardgf genomicregionsincropwildhybridsoflettuceareaffecteddifferentlyindifferentenvironmentsimplicationsforcropbreeding
AT vantienderenpeterh genomicregionsincropwildhybridsoflettuceareaffecteddifferentlyindifferentenvironmentsimplicationsforcropbreeding