Cargando…

Does tumour biology determine surgical success in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer? A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynaecological cancer. Progression-free and overall survival is significantly related to surgical success and residual disease volume. It is unclear whether this survival advantage is due to an intrinsic biological element of the tumour cells which enabl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borley, J, Wilhelm-Benartzi, C, Brown, R, Ghaem-Maghami, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3461167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22935582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.376
_version_ 1782245047673028608
author Borley, J
Wilhelm-Benartzi, C
Brown, R
Ghaem-Maghami, S
author_facet Borley, J
Wilhelm-Benartzi, C
Brown, R
Ghaem-Maghami, S
author_sort Borley, J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynaecological cancer. Progression-free and overall survival is significantly related to surgical success and residual disease volume. It is unclear whether this survival advantage is due to an intrinsic biological element of the tumour cells which enables successful surgery and improved prognosis, or alternatively the number of tumour sustaining cells remaining irrespective of differences in biology. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed identifying studies that have investigated the association between biomarkers and surgical outcomes. We attempted validation of these results using The Cancer Genome Atlas ovarian cancer data sets. RESULTS: Thirty studies were identified of which sixteen determined protein expression, eight gene expression and one DNA methylation in association with surgical debulking. Individualised linear models adjusting for batch, stage and age identified only expression of the genes MTDH and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) to be significantly associated with debulking surgery (P<0.05, false discovery rate (FDR)<5%), although in the case of IGF1R this was in the opposite direction to previous findings. CONCLUSION: The majority of studies are limited by design, include heterogeneous samples and lack adjustment for major confounding factors. High quality detailed clinical annotations should be routinely collected in future to more accurately evaluate biomarkers of surgical outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3461167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34611672013-09-25 Does tumour biology determine surgical success in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer? A systematic literature review Borley, J Wilhelm-Benartzi, C Brown, R Ghaem-Maghami, S Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynaecological cancer. Progression-free and overall survival is significantly related to surgical success and residual disease volume. It is unclear whether this survival advantage is due to an intrinsic biological element of the tumour cells which enables successful surgery and improved prognosis, or alternatively the number of tumour sustaining cells remaining irrespective of differences in biology. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed identifying studies that have investigated the association between biomarkers and surgical outcomes. We attempted validation of these results using The Cancer Genome Atlas ovarian cancer data sets. RESULTS: Thirty studies were identified of which sixteen determined protein expression, eight gene expression and one DNA methylation in association with surgical debulking. Individualised linear models adjusting for batch, stage and age identified only expression of the genes MTDH and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) to be significantly associated with debulking surgery (P<0.05, false discovery rate (FDR)<5%), although in the case of IGF1R this was in the opposite direction to previous findings. CONCLUSION: The majority of studies are limited by design, include heterogeneous samples and lack adjustment for major confounding factors. High quality detailed clinical annotations should be routinely collected in future to more accurately evaluate biomarkers of surgical outcome. Nature Publishing Group 2012-09-25 2012-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3461167/ /pubmed/22935582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.376 Text en Copyright © 2012 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Borley, J
Wilhelm-Benartzi, C
Brown, R
Ghaem-Maghami, S
Does tumour biology determine surgical success in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer? A systematic literature review
title Does tumour biology determine surgical success in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer? A systematic literature review
title_full Does tumour biology determine surgical success in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer? A systematic literature review
title_fullStr Does tumour biology determine surgical success in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer? A systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Does tumour biology determine surgical success in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer? A systematic literature review
title_short Does tumour biology determine surgical success in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer? A systematic literature review
title_sort does tumour biology determine surgical success in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer? a systematic literature review
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3461167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22935582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.376
work_keys_str_mv AT borleyj doestumourbiologydeterminesurgicalsuccessinthetreatmentofepithelialovariancancerasystematicliteraturereview
AT wilhelmbenartzic doestumourbiologydeterminesurgicalsuccessinthetreatmentofepithelialovariancancerasystematicliteraturereview
AT brownr doestumourbiologydeterminesurgicalsuccessinthetreatmentofepithelialovariancancerasystematicliteraturereview
AT ghaemmaghamis doestumourbiologydeterminesurgicalsuccessinthetreatmentofepithelialovariancancerasystematicliteraturereview