Cargando…

arriba-lib: evaluation of an electronic library of decision aids in primary care physicians

BACKGROUND: The successful implementation of decision aids in clinical practice initially depends on how clinicians perceive them. Relatively little is known about the acceptance of decision aids by physicians and factors influencing the implementation of decision aids from their point of view. Our...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirsch, Oliver, Keller, Heidemarie, Krones, Tanja, Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3461416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22672414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-48
_version_ 1782245071360360448
author Hirsch, Oliver
Keller, Heidemarie
Krones, Tanja
Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
author_facet Hirsch, Oliver
Keller, Heidemarie
Krones, Tanja
Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
author_sort Hirsch, Oliver
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The successful implementation of decision aids in clinical practice initially depends on how clinicians perceive them. Relatively little is known about the acceptance of decision aids by physicians and factors influencing the implementation of decision aids from their point of view. Our electronic library of decision aids (arriba-lib) is to be used within the encounter and has a modular structure containing evidence-based decision aids for the following topics: cardiovascular prevention, atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease, oral antidiabetics, conventional and intensified insulin therapy, and unipolar depression. The aim of our study was to evaluate the acceptance of arriba-lib in primary care physicians. METHODS: We conducted an evaluation study in which 29 primary care physicians included 192 patients. The physician questionnaire contained information on which module was used, how extensive steps of the shared decision making process were discussed, who made the decision, and a subjective appraisal of consultation length. We used generalised estimation equations to measure associations within patient variables and traditional crosstab analyses. RESULTS: Only a minority of consultations (8.9%) was considered to be unacceptably extended. In 90.6% of consultations, physicians said that a decision could be made. A shared decision was perceived by physicians in 57.1% of consultations. Physicians said that a decision was more likely to be made when therapeutic options were discussed “detailed”. Prior experience with decision aids was not a critical variable for implementation within our sample of primary care physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that it might be feasible to apply our electronic library of decision aids (arriba-lib) in the primary care context. Evidence-based decision aids offer support for physicians in the management of medical information. Future studies should monitor the long-term adoption of arriba-lib in primary care physicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3461416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34614162012-10-02 arriba-lib: evaluation of an electronic library of decision aids in primary care physicians Hirsch, Oliver Keller, Heidemarie Krones, Tanja Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: The successful implementation of decision aids in clinical practice initially depends on how clinicians perceive them. Relatively little is known about the acceptance of decision aids by physicians and factors influencing the implementation of decision aids from their point of view. Our electronic library of decision aids (arriba-lib) is to be used within the encounter and has a modular structure containing evidence-based decision aids for the following topics: cardiovascular prevention, atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease, oral antidiabetics, conventional and intensified insulin therapy, and unipolar depression. The aim of our study was to evaluate the acceptance of arriba-lib in primary care physicians. METHODS: We conducted an evaluation study in which 29 primary care physicians included 192 patients. The physician questionnaire contained information on which module was used, how extensive steps of the shared decision making process were discussed, who made the decision, and a subjective appraisal of consultation length. We used generalised estimation equations to measure associations within patient variables and traditional crosstab analyses. RESULTS: Only a minority of consultations (8.9%) was considered to be unacceptably extended. In 90.6% of consultations, physicians said that a decision could be made. A shared decision was perceived by physicians in 57.1% of consultations. Physicians said that a decision was more likely to be made when therapeutic options were discussed “detailed”. Prior experience with decision aids was not a critical variable for implementation within our sample of primary care physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that it might be feasible to apply our electronic library of decision aids (arriba-lib) in the primary care context. Evidence-based decision aids offer support for physicians in the management of medical information. Future studies should monitor the long-term adoption of arriba-lib in primary care physicians. BioMed Central 2012-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3461416/ /pubmed/22672414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-48 Text en Copyright ©2012 Hirsch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hirsch, Oliver
Keller, Heidemarie
Krones, Tanja
Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
arriba-lib: evaluation of an electronic library of decision aids in primary care physicians
title arriba-lib: evaluation of an electronic library of decision aids in primary care physicians
title_full arriba-lib: evaluation of an electronic library of decision aids in primary care physicians
title_fullStr arriba-lib: evaluation of an electronic library of decision aids in primary care physicians
title_full_unstemmed arriba-lib: evaluation of an electronic library of decision aids in primary care physicians
title_short arriba-lib: evaluation of an electronic library of decision aids in primary care physicians
title_sort arriba-lib: evaluation of an electronic library of decision aids in primary care physicians
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3461416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22672414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-48
work_keys_str_mv AT hirscholiver arribalibevaluationofanelectroniclibraryofdecisionaidsinprimarycarephysicians
AT kellerheidemarie arribalibevaluationofanelectroniclibraryofdecisionaidsinprimarycarephysicians
AT kronestanja arribalibevaluationofanelectroniclibraryofdecisionaidsinprimarycarephysicians
AT donnerbanzhoffnorbert arribalibevaluationofanelectroniclibraryofdecisionaidsinprimarycarephysicians