Cargando…

Country ownership and capacity building: the next buzzwords in health systems strengthening or a truly new approach to development?

BACKGROUND: During the last decade, donor governments and international agencies have increasingly emphasized the importance of building the capacity of indigenous health care organizations as part of strengthening health systems and ensuring sustainability. In 2009, the U.S. Global Health Initiativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldberg, Jessica, Bryant, Malcolm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3461461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22818046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-531
_version_ 1782245081051299840
author Goldberg, Jessica
Bryant, Malcolm
author_facet Goldberg, Jessica
Bryant, Malcolm
author_sort Goldberg, Jessica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the last decade, donor governments and international agencies have increasingly emphasized the importance of building the capacity of indigenous health care organizations as part of strengthening health systems and ensuring sustainability. In 2009, the U.S. Global Health Initiative made country ownership and capacity building keystones of U.S. health development assistance, and yet there is still a lack of consensus on how to define either of these terms, or how to implement “country owned capacity building”. DISCUSSION: Concepts around capacity building have been well developed in the for-profit business sector, but remain less well defined in the non-profit and social sectors in low and middle-income countries. Historically, capacity building in developing countries has been externally driven, related to project implementation, and often resulted in disempowerment of local organizations rather than local ownership. Despite the expenditure of millions of dollars, there is no consensus on how to conduct capacity building, nor have there been rigorous evaluations of capacity building efforts. To shift to a new paradigm of country owned capacity building, donor assistance needs to be inclusive in the planning process and create true partnerships to conduct organizational assessments, analyze challenges to organizational success, prioritize addressing challenges, and implement appropriate activities to build new capacity in overcoming challenges. Before further investments are made, a solid evidence base should be established concerning what works and what doesn’t work to build capacity. SUMMARY: Country-owned capacity building is a relatively new concept that requires further theoretical exploration. Documents such as The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness detail the principles of country ownership to which partner and donor countries should commit, but do not identify the specific mechanisms to carry out these principles. More evidence as to how country-owned capacity building plays out in practice is needed to guide future interventions. The Global Health Initiative funding that is currently underway is an opportunity to collect evaluative data and establish a centralized and comprehensive evidence base that could be made available to guide future country-owned capacity building efforts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3461461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34614612012-10-02 Country ownership and capacity building: the next buzzwords in health systems strengthening or a truly new approach to development? Goldberg, Jessica Bryant, Malcolm BMC Public Health Debate BACKGROUND: During the last decade, donor governments and international agencies have increasingly emphasized the importance of building the capacity of indigenous health care organizations as part of strengthening health systems and ensuring sustainability. In 2009, the U.S. Global Health Initiative made country ownership and capacity building keystones of U.S. health development assistance, and yet there is still a lack of consensus on how to define either of these terms, or how to implement “country owned capacity building”. DISCUSSION: Concepts around capacity building have been well developed in the for-profit business sector, but remain less well defined in the non-profit and social sectors in low and middle-income countries. Historically, capacity building in developing countries has been externally driven, related to project implementation, and often resulted in disempowerment of local organizations rather than local ownership. Despite the expenditure of millions of dollars, there is no consensus on how to conduct capacity building, nor have there been rigorous evaluations of capacity building efforts. To shift to a new paradigm of country owned capacity building, donor assistance needs to be inclusive in the planning process and create true partnerships to conduct organizational assessments, analyze challenges to organizational success, prioritize addressing challenges, and implement appropriate activities to build new capacity in overcoming challenges. Before further investments are made, a solid evidence base should be established concerning what works and what doesn’t work to build capacity. SUMMARY: Country-owned capacity building is a relatively new concept that requires further theoretical exploration. Documents such as The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness detail the principles of country ownership to which partner and donor countries should commit, but do not identify the specific mechanisms to carry out these principles. More evidence as to how country-owned capacity building plays out in practice is needed to guide future interventions. The Global Health Initiative funding that is currently underway is an opportunity to collect evaluative data and establish a centralized and comprehensive evidence base that could be made available to guide future country-owned capacity building efforts. BioMed Central 2012-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3461461/ /pubmed/22818046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-531 Text en Copyright ©2012 Goldberg and Bryant; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debate
Goldberg, Jessica
Bryant, Malcolm
Country ownership and capacity building: the next buzzwords in health systems strengthening or a truly new approach to development?
title Country ownership and capacity building: the next buzzwords in health systems strengthening or a truly new approach to development?
title_full Country ownership and capacity building: the next buzzwords in health systems strengthening or a truly new approach to development?
title_fullStr Country ownership and capacity building: the next buzzwords in health systems strengthening or a truly new approach to development?
title_full_unstemmed Country ownership and capacity building: the next buzzwords in health systems strengthening or a truly new approach to development?
title_short Country ownership and capacity building: the next buzzwords in health systems strengthening or a truly new approach to development?
title_sort country ownership and capacity building: the next buzzwords in health systems strengthening or a truly new approach to development?
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3461461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22818046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-531
work_keys_str_mv AT goldbergjessica countryownershipandcapacitybuildingthenextbuzzwordsinhealthsystemsstrengtheningoratrulynewapproachtodevelopment
AT bryantmalcolm countryownershipandcapacitybuildingthenextbuzzwordsinhealthsystemsstrengtheningoratrulynewapproachtodevelopment