Cargando…

Remote control catheter navigation: options for guidance under MRI

BACKGROUND: Image-guided endovascular interventions have gained increasing popularity in clinical practice, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is emerging as an attractive alternative to X-ray fluoroscopy for guiding such interventions. Steering catheters by remote control under MRI guidance offer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muller, Leah, Saeed, Maythem, Wilson, Mark W, Hetts, Steven W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3461467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22655535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-33
_version_ 1782245082478411776
author Muller, Leah
Saeed, Maythem
Wilson, Mark W
Hetts, Steven W
author_facet Muller, Leah
Saeed, Maythem
Wilson, Mark W
Hetts, Steven W
author_sort Muller, Leah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Image-guided endovascular interventions have gained increasing popularity in clinical practice, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is emerging as an attractive alternative to X-ray fluoroscopy for guiding such interventions. Steering catheters by remote control under MRI guidance offers unique challenges and opportunities. METHODS: In this review, the benefits and limitations of MRI-guided remote control intervention are addressed, and the tools for guiding such interventions in the magnetic environment are summarized. Designs for remote control catheter guidance include a catheter tip electromagnetic microcoil design, a ferromagnetic sphere-tipped catheter design, smart material-actuated catheters, and hydraulically actuated catheters. Remote control catheter guidance systems were compared and contrasted with respect to visualization, safety, and performance. Performance is characterized by bending angles achievable by the catheter, time to achieve bending, degree of rotation achievable, and miniaturization capacity of the design. Necessary improvements for furthering catheter design, especially for use in the MRI environment, are addressed, as are hurdles that must be overcome in order to make MRI guided endovascular procedures more accessible for regular use in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: MR-guided endovascular interventions under remote control steering are in their infancy due to issues regarding safety and reliability. Additional experimental studies are needed prior to their use in humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3461467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34614672012-10-02 Remote control catheter navigation: options for guidance under MRI Muller, Leah Saeed, Maythem Wilson, Mark W Hetts, Steven W J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Review BACKGROUND: Image-guided endovascular interventions have gained increasing popularity in clinical practice, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is emerging as an attractive alternative to X-ray fluoroscopy for guiding such interventions. Steering catheters by remote control under MRI guidance offers unique challenges and opportunities. METHODS: In this review, the benefits and limitations of MRI-guided remote control intervention are addressed, and the tools for guiding such interventions in the magnetic environment are summarized. Designs for remote control catheter guidance include a catheter tip electromagnetic microcoil design, a ferromagnetic sphere-tipped catheter design, smart material-actuated catheters, and hydraulically actuated catheters. Remote control catheter guidance systems were compared and contrasted with respect to visualization, safety, and performance. Performance is characterized by bending angles achievable by the catheter, time to achieve bending, degree of rotation achievable, and miniaturization capacity of the design. Necessary improvements for furthering catheter design, especially for use in the MRI environment, are addressed, as are hurdles that must be overcome in order to make MRI guided endovascular procedures more accessible for regular use in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: MR-guided endovascular interventions under remote control steering are in their infancy due to issues regarding safety and reliability. Additional experimental studies are needed prior to their use in humans. BioMed Central 2012-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3461467/ /pubmed/22655535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-33 Text en Copyright ©2012 Muller et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Muller, Leah
Saeed, Maythem
Wilson, Mark W
Hetts, Steven W
Remote control catheter navigation: options for guidance under MRI
title Remote control catheter navigation: options for guidance under MRI
title_full Remote control catheter navigation: options for guidance under MRI
title_fullStr Remote control catheter navigation: options for guidance under MRI
title_full_unstemmed Remote control catheter navigation: options for guidance under MRI
title_short Remote control catheter navigation: options for guidance under MRI
title_sort remote control catheter navigation: options for guidance under mri
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3461467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22655535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-33
work_keys_str_mv AT mullerleah remotecontrolcatheternavigationoptionsforguidanceundermri
AT saeedmaythem remotecontrolcatheternavigationoptionsforguidanceundermri
AT wilsonmarkw remotecontrolcatheternavigationoptionsforguidanceundermri
AT hettsstevenw remotecontrolcatheternavigationoptionsforguidanceundermri