Cargando…
Designing next-generation platforms for evaluating scientific output: what scientists can learn from the social web
Traditional pre-publication peer review of scientific output is a slow, inefficient, and unreliable process. Efforts to replace or supplement traditional evaluation models with open evaluation platforms that leverage advances in information technology are slowly gaining traction, but remain in the e...
Autor principal: | Yarkoni, Tal |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3461500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23060783 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00072 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Nine Criteria for a Measure of Scientific Output
por: Kreiman, Gabriel, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Diversity and the next-generation physician-scientist
por: Behera, Anit, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Success and the next generation of physician-scientists
por: Hsiao, Chu J., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The Next Generation Scientist program: capacity-building for future scientific leaders in low- and middle-income countries
por: Pillai, Goonaseelan, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Embracing Offline first: designing for the next web paradigm
por: Ater, Tal
Publicado: (2018)