Cargando…
Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data?
Accurate estimates of HIV incidence are crucial to understand the extent of transmission of the infection, evaluate intervention strategies and effectively plan new public health control measures. HIV/AIDS surveillance systems in numerous industrialised countries record the number of known new HIV a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3462419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23049659 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874613601206010108 |
_version_ | 1782245175368613888 |
---|---|
author | Mallitt, Kylie-Ann Wilson, David P McDonald, Ann Wand, Handan |
author_facet | Mallitt, Kylie-Ann Wilson, David P McDonald, Ann Wand, Handan |
author_sort | Mallitt, Kylie-Ann |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accurate estimates of HIV incidence are crucial to understand the extent of transmission of the infection, evaluate intervention strategies and effectively plan new public health control measures. HIV/AIDS surveillance systems in numerous industrialised countries record the number of known new HIV and/or AIDS diagnoses, which are often used as a surrogate marker for HIV incidence. HIV/AIDS diagnosis data have been used to reconstruct historical HIV incidence trends using modified back-projection methods. Estimates of HIV incidence are most robust when reliable data on the number of incident infections, a subset of all diagnoses, is widely available, and surveillance systems should prioritise the collection of these data. Back-projection alone provides reliable estimates of HIV incidence in the past, but is not useful when estimating current or future HIV incidence. However, back-projection methodology should be used in conjunction with other corroborative methods to estimate current HIV incidence, and methods to combine the various techniques should be investigated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3462419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34624192012-10-04 Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data? Mallitt, Kylie-Ann Wilson, David P McDonald, Ann Wand, Handan Open AIDS J Article Accurate estimates of HIV incidence are crucial to understand the extent of transmission of the infection, evaluate intervention strategies and effectively plan new public health control measures. HIV/AIDS surveillance systems in numerous industrialised countries record the number of known new HIV and/or AIDS diagnoses, which are often used as a surrogate marker for HIV incidence. HIV/AIDS diagnosis data have been used to reconstruct historical HIV incidence trends using modified back-projection methods. Estimates of HIV incidence are most robust when reliable data on the number of incident infections, a subset of all diagnoses, is widely available, and surveillance systems should prioritise the collection of these data. Back-projection alone provides reliable estimates of HIV incidence in the past, but is not useful when estimating current or future HIV incidence. However, back-projection methodology should be used in conjunction with other corroborative methods to estimate current HIV incidence, and methods to combine the various techniques should be investigated. Bentham Open 2012-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3462419/ /pubmed/23049659 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874613601206010108 Text en © Mallitt et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Mallitt, Kylie-Ann Wilson, David P McDonald, Ann Wand, Handan Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data? |
title | Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data? |
title_full | Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data? |
title_fullStr | Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data? |
title_short | Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data? |
title_sort | is back-projection methodology still relevant for estimating hiv incidence from national surveillance data? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3462419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23049659 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874613601206010108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mallittkylieann isbackprojectionmethodologystillrelevantforestimatinghivincidencefromnationalsurveillancedata AT wilsondavidp isbackprojectionmethodologystillrelevantforestimatinghivincidencefromnationalsurveillancedata AT mcdonaldann isbackprojectionmethodologystillrelevantforestimatinghivincidencefromnationalsurveillancedata AT wandhandan isbackprojectionmethodologystillrelevantforestimatinghivincidencefromnationalsurveillancedata |