Cargando…

Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data?

Accurate estimates of HIV incidence are crucial to understand the extent of transmission of the infection, evaluate intervention strategies and effectively plan new public health control measures. HIV/AIDS surveillance systems in numerous industrialised countries record the number of known new HIV a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mallitt, Kylie-Ann, Wilson, David P, McDonald, Ann, Wand, Handan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3462419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23049659
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874613601206010108
_version_ 1782245175368613888
author Mallitt, Kylie-Ann
Wilson, David P
McDonald, Ann
Wand, Handan
author_facet Mallitt, Kylie-Ann
Wilson, David P
McDonald, Ann
Wand, Handan
author_sort Mallitt, Kylie-Ann
collection PubMed
description Accurate estimates of HIV incidence are crucial to understand the extent of transmission of the infection, evaluate intervention strategies and effectively plan new public health control measures. HIV/AIDS surveillance systems in numerous industrialised countries record the number of known new HIV and/or AIDS diagnoses, which are often used as a surrogate marker for HIV incidence. HIV/AIDS diagnosis data have been used to reconstruct historical HIV incidence trends using modified back-projection methods. Estimates of HIV incidence are most robust when reliable data on the number of incident infections, a subset of all diagnoses, is widely available, and surveillance systems should prioritise the collection of these data. Back-projection alone provides reliable estimates of HIV incidence in the past, but is not useful when estimating current or future HIV incidence. However, back-projection methodology should be used in conjunction with other corroborative methods to estimate current HIV incidence, and methods to combine the various techniques should be investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3462419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34624192012-10-04 Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data? Mallitt, Kylie-Ann Wilson, David P McDonald, Ann Wand, Handan Open AIDS J Article Accurate estimates of HIV incidence are crucial to understand the extent of transmission of the infection, evaluate intervention strategies and effectively plan new public health control measures. HIV/AIDS surveillance systems in numerous industrialised countries record the number of known new HIV and/or AIDS diagnoses, which are often used as a surrogate marker for HIV incidence. HIV/AIDS diagnosis data have been used to reconstruct historical HIV incidence trends using modified back-projection methods. Estimates of HIV incidence are most robust when reliable data on the number of incident infections, a subset of all diagnoses, is widely available, and surveillance systems should prioritise the collection of these data. Back-projection alone provides reliable estimates of HIV incidence in the past, but is not useful when estimating current or future HIV incidence. However, back-projection methodology should be used in conjunction with other corroborative methods to estimate current HIV incidence, and methods to combine the various techniques should be investigated. Bentham Open 2012-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3462419/ /pubmed/23049659 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874613601206010108 Text en © Mallitt et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Mallitt, Kylie-Ann
Wilson, David P
McDonald, Ann
Wand, Handan
Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data?
title Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data?
title_full Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data?
title_fullStr Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data?
title_full_unstemmed Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data?
title_short Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data?
title_sort is back-projection methodology still relevant for estimating hiv incidence from national surveillance data?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3462419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23049659
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874613601206010108
work_keys_str_mv AT mallittkylieann isbackprojectionmethodologystillrelevantforestimatinghivincidencefromnationalsurveillancedata
AT wilsondavidp isbackprojectionmethodologystillrelevantforestimatinghivincidencefromnationalsurveillancedata
AT mcdonaldann isbackprojectionmethodologystillrelevantforestimatinghivincidencefromnationalsurveillancedata
AT wandhandan isbackprojectionmethodologystillrelevantforestimatinghivincidencefromnationalsurveillancedata