Cargando…

Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To synthesise the literature on indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed (1966 to present), Embase (1974 to present), and Web of Science (1898 to present). Study selection All articles that reported an original effect stat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wehner, Mackenzie R, Shive, Melissa L, Chren, Mary-Margaret, Han, Jiali, Qureshi, Abrar A, Linos, Eleni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3462818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23033409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5909
_version_ 1782245218748203008
author Wehner, Mackenzie R
Shive, Melissa L
Chren, Mary-Margaret
Han, Jiali
Qureshi, Abrar A
Linos, Eleni
author_facet Wehner, Mackenzie R
Shive, Melissa L
Chren, Mary-Margaret
Han, Jiali
Qureshi, Abrar A
Linos, Eleni
author_sort Wehner, Mackenzie R
collection PubMed
description Objective To synthesise the literature on indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed (1966 to present), Embase (1974 to present), and Web of Science (1898 to present). Study selection All articles that reported an original effect statistic for indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer were included. Articles that presented no data, such as review articles and editorials, were excluded, as were articles in languages other than English. Data extraction Two investigators independently extracted data. Random effects meta-analysis was used to summarise the relative risk of ever use versus never use of indoor tanning. Dose-response effects and exposure to indoor tanning during early life were also examined. The population attributable risk fraction for the United States population was calculated. Results 12 studies with 9328 cases of non-melanoma skin cancer were included. Among people who reported ever using indoor tanning compared with those who never used indoor tanning, the summary relative risk for squamous cell carcinoma was 1.67 (95% confidence interval 1.29 to 2.17) and that for basal cell carcinoma was 1.29 (1.08 to 1.53). No significant heterogeneity existed between studies. The population attributable risk fraction for the United States was estimated to be 8.2% for squamous cell carcinoma and 3.7% for basal cell carcinoma. This corresponds to more than 170 000 cases of non-melanoma skin cancer each year attributable to indoor tanning. On the basis of data from three studies, use of indoor tanning before age 25 was more strongly associated with both squamous cell carcinoma (relative risk 2.02, 0.70 to 5.86) and basal cell carcinoma (1.40, 1.29 to 1.52). Conclusions Indoor tanning is associated with a significantly increased risk of both basal and squamous cell skin cancer. The risk is higher with use in early life (<25 years). This modifiable risk factor may account for hundreds of thousands of cases of non-melanoma skin cancer each year in the United States alone and many more worldwide. These findings contribute to the growing body of evidence on the harms of indoor tanning and support public health campaigns and regulation to reduce exposure to this carcinogen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3462818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34628182012-10-03 Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis Wehner, Mackenzie R Shive, Melissa L Chren, Mary-Margaret Han, Jiali Qureshi, Abrar A Linos, Eleni BMJ Research Objective To synthesise the literature on indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed (1966 to present), Embase (1974 to present), and Web of Science (1898 to present). Study selection All articles that reported an original effect statistic for indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer were included. Articles that presented no data, such as review articles and editorials, were excluded, as were articles in languages other than English. Data extraction Two investigators independently extracted data. Random effects meta-analysis was used to summarise the relative risk of ever use versus never use of indoor tanning. Dose-response effects and exposure to indoor tanning during early life were also examined. The population attributable risk fraction for the United States population was calculated. Results 12 studies with 9328 cases of non-melanoma skin cancer were included. Among people who reported ever using indoor tanning compared with those who never used indoor tanning, the summary relative risk for squamous cell carcinoma was 1.67 (95% confidence interval 1.29 to 2.17) and that for basal cell carcinoma was 1.29 (1.08 to 1.53). No significant heterogeneity existed between studies. The population attributable risk fraction for the United States was estimated to be 8.2% for squamous cell carcinoma and 3.7% for basal cell carcinoma. This corresponds to more than 170 000 cases of non-melanoma skin cancer each year attributable to indoor tanning. On the basis of data from three studies, use of indoor tanning before age 25 was more strongly associated with both squamous cell carcinoma (relative risk 2.02, 0.70 to 5.86) and basal cell carcinoma (1.40, 1.29 to 1.52). Conclusions Indoor tanning is associated with a significantly increased risk of both basal and squamous cell skin cancer. The risk is higher with use in early life (<25 years). This modifiable risk factor may account for hundreds of thousands of cases of non-melanoma skin cancer each year in the United States alone and many more worldwide. These findings contribute to the growing body of evidence on the harms of indoor tanning and support public health campaigns and regulation to reduce exposure to this carcinogen. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3462818/ /pubmed/23033409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5909 Text en © Wehner et al 2012 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Wehner, Mackenzie R
Shive, Melissa L
Chren, Mary-Margaret
Han, Jiali
Qureshi, Abrar A
Linos, Eleni
Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3462818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23033409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5909
work_keys_str_mv AT wehnermackenzier indoortanningandnonmelanomaskincancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shivemelissal indoortanningandnonmelanomaskincancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chrenmarymargaret indoortanningandnonmelanomaskincancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanjiali indoortanningandnonmelanomaskincancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qureshiabrara indoortanningandnonmelanomaskincancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linoseleni indoortanningandnonmelanomaskincancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis