Cargando…
Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
Objective To synthesise the literature on indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed (1966 to present), Embase (1974 to present), and Web of Science (1898 to present). Study selection All articles that reported an original effect stat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3462818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23033409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5909 |
_version_ | 1782245218748203008 |
---|---|
author | Wehner, Mackenzie R Shive, Melissa L Chren, Mary-Margaret Han, Jiali Qureshi, Abrar A Linos, Eleni |
author_facet | Wehner, Mackenzie R Shive, Melissa L Chren, Mary-Margaret Han, Jiali Qureshi, Abrar A Linos, Eleni |
author_sort | Wehner, Mackenzie R |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To synthesise the literature on indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed (1966 to present), Embase (1974 to present), and Web of Science (1898 to present). Study selection All articles that reported an original effect statistic for indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer were included. Articles that presented no data, such as review articles and editorials, were excluded, as were articles in languages other than English. Data extraction Two investigators independently extracted data. Random effects meta-analysis was used to summarise the relative risk of ever use versus never use of indoor tanning. Dose-response effects and exposure to indoor tanning during early life were also examined. The population attributable risk fraction for the United States population was calculated. Results 12 studies with 9328 cases of non-melanoma skin cancer were included. Among people who reported ever using indoor tanning compared with those who never used indoor tanning, the summary relative risk for squamous cell carcinoma was 1.67 (95% confidence interval 1.29 to 2.17) and that for basal cell carcinoma was 1.29 (1.08 to 1.53). No significant heterogeneity existed between studies. The population attributable risk fraction for the United States was estimated to be 8.2% for squamous cell carcinoma and 3.7% for basal cell carcinoma. This corresponds to more than 170 000 cases of non-melanoma skin cancer each year attributable to indoor tanning. On the basis of data from three studies, use of indoor tanning before age 25 was more strongly associated with both squamous cell carcinoma (relative risk 2.02, 0.70 to 5.86) and basal cell carcinoma (1.40, 1.29 to 1.52). Conclusions Indoor tanning is associated with a significantly increased risk of both basal and squamous cell skin cancer. The risk is higher with use in early life (<25 years). This modifiable risk factor may account for hundreds of thousands of cases of non-melanoma skin cancer each year in the United States alone and many more worldwide. These findings contribute to the growing body of evidence on the harms of indoor tanning and support public health campaigns and regulation to reduce exposure to this carcinogen. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3462818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34628182012-10-03 Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis Wehner, Mackenzie R Shive, Melissa L Chren, Mary-Margaret Han, Jiali Qureshi, Abrar A Linos, Eleni BMJ Research Objective To synthesise the literature on indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed (1966 to present), Embase (1974 to present), and Web of Science (1898 to present). Study selection All articles that reported an original effect statistic for indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer were included. Articles that presented no data, such as review articles and editorials, were excluded, as were articles in languages other than English. Data extraction Two investigators independently extracted data. Random effects meta-analysis was used to summarise the relative risk of ever use versus never use of indoor tanning. Dose-response effects and exposure to indoor tanning during early life were also examined. The population attributable risk fraction for the United States population was calculated. Results 12 studies with 9328 cases of non-melanoma skin cancer were included. Among people who reported ever using indoor tanning compared with those who never used indoor tanning, the summary relative risk for squamous cell carcinoma was 1.67 (95% confidence interval 1.29 to 2.17) and that for basal cell carcinoma was 1.29 (1.08 to 1.53). No significant heterogeneity existed between studies. The population attributable risk fraction for the United States was estimated to be 8.2% for squamous cell carcinoma and 3.7% for basal cell carcinoma. This corresponds to more than 170 000 cases of non-melanoma skin cancer each year attributable to indoor tanning. On the basis of data from three studies, use of indoor tanning before age 25 was more strongly associated with both squamous cell carcinoma (relative risk 2.02, 0.70 to 5.86) and basal cell carcinoma (1.40, 1.29 to 1.52). Conclusions Indoor tanning is associated with a significantly increased risk of both basal and squamous cell skin cancer. The risk is higher with use in early life (<25 years). This modifiable risk factor may account for hundreds of thousands of cases of non-melanoma skin cancer each year in the United States alone and many more worldwide. These findings contribute to the growing body of evidence on the harms of indoor tanning and support public health campaigns and regulation to reduce exposure to this carcinogen. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3462818/ /pubmed/23033409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5909 Text en © Wehner et al 2012 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Research Wehner, Mackenzie R Shive, Melissa L Chren, Mary-Margaret Han, Jiali Qureshi, Abrar A Linos, Eleni Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3462818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23033409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5909 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wehnermackenzier indoortanningandnonmelanomaskincancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shivemelissal indoortanningandnonmelanomaskincancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chrenmarymargaret indoortanningandnonmelanomaskincancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hanjiali indoortanningandnonmelanomaskincancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT qureshiabrara indoortanningandnonmelanomaskincancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linoseleni indoortanningandnonmelanomaskincancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |