Cargando…
Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Digital radiographs have some advantages over conventional ones. Application of digital recep-tors is not routine yet. Therefore, there is a need for digitizing conventional radiographs. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventiona...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23230500 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2009.031 |
_version_ | 1782245257928245248 |
---|---|
author | Valizadeh, Solmaz Tavakoli, Mohammad Amin Zarabian, Tara Esmaeili, Farzad |
author_facet | Valizadeh, Solmaz Tavakoli, Mohammad Amin Zarabian, Tara Esmaeili, Farzad |
author_sort | Valizadeh, Solmaz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Digital radiographs have some advantages over conventional ones. Application of digital recep-tors is not routine yet. Therefore, there is a need for digitizing conventional radiographs. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional radiographs by scanner and camera in detection of proximal car-ies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and sixteen surfaces of 158 extracted posterior teeth were radiographed. The radiographs were digitized using a digital camera and a scanner. Five observers scored the images for the presence and depth of caries. Histopathologic sections were the gold standard. Kappa agreement coefficient was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Kappa agreement coefficients between the camera and the scanner and also between each one with the gold stan-dard in detecting the depth of caries were 0.504, 0.557 and 0.454, respectively. In detection of caries, the indexes were 0.571, 0.553 and 0.527, respectively. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracy of camera images in caries detection was more than that of scanned images, but there was also a moderate consistency between them. The consistency of detecting the presence of caries was more than that of detecting their depths. It seems that both digital cameras and scanners can be used interchangeably. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3463097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34630972012-12-10 Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries Valizadeh, Solmaz Tavakoli, Mohammad Amin Zarabian, Tara Esmaeili, Farzad J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Digital radiographs have some advantages over conventional ones. Application of digital recep-tors is not routine yet. Therefore, there is a need for digitizing conventional radiographs. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional radiographs by scanner and camera in detection of proximal car-ies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and sixteen surfaces of 158 extracted posterior teeth were radiographed. The radiographs were digitized using a digital camera and a scanner. Five observers scored the images for the presence and depth of caries. Histopathologic sections were the gold standard. Kappa agreement coefficient was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Kappa agreement coefficients between the camera and the scanner and also between each one with the gold stan-dard in detecting the depth of caries were 0.504, 0.557 and 0.454, respectively. In detection of caries, the indexes were 0.571, 0.553 and 0.527, respectively. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracy of camera images in caries detection was more than that of scanned images, but there was also a moderate consistency between them. The consistency of detecting the presence of caries was more than that of detecting their depths. It seems that both digital cameras and scanners can be used interchangeably. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2009 2009-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3463097/ /pubmed/23230500 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2009.031 Text en © 2009 The Authors; Tabriz University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Valizadeh, Solmaz Tavakoli, Mohammad Amin Zarabian, Tara Esmaeili, Farzad Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries |
title | Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries |
title_full | Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries |
title_short | Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional radiographs by camera and scanner in detection of proximal caries |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23230500 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2009.031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valizadehsolmaz diagnosticaccuracyofdigitizedconventionalradiographsbycameraandscannerindetectionofproximalcaries AT tavakolimohammadamin diagnosticaccuracyofdigitizedconventionalradiographsbycameraandscannerindetectionofproximalcaries AT zarabiantara diagnosticaccuracyofdigitizedconventionalradiographsbycameraandscannerindetectionofproximalcaries AT esmaeilifarzad diagnosticaccuracyofdigitizedconventionalradiographsbycameraandscannerindetectionofproximalcaries |