Cargando…

Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Digital radiographs have some advantages over conventional ones. Application of digital recep-tors is not routine yet. Therefore, there is a need for digitizing conventional radiographs. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valizadeh, Solmaz, Tavakoli, Mohammad Amin, Zarabian, Tara, Esmaeili, Farzad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23230500
http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2009.031
_version_ 1782245257928245248
author Valizadeh, Solmaz
Tavakoli, Mohammad Amin
Zarabian, Tara
Esmaeili, Farzad
author_facet Valizadeh, Solmaz
Tavakoli, Mohammad Amin
Zarabian, Tara
Esmaeili, Farzad
author_sort Valizadeh, Solmaz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Digital radiographs have some advantages over conventional ones. Application of digital recep-tors is not routine yet. Therefore, there is a need for digitizing conventional radiographs. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional radiographs by scanner and camera in detection of proximal car-ies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and sixteen surfaces of 158 extracted posterior teeth were radiographed. The radiographs were digitized using a digital camera and a scanner. Five observers scored the images for the presence and depth of caries. Histopathologic sections were the gold standard. Kappa agreement coefficient was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Kappa agreement coefficients between the camera and the scanner and also between each one with the gold stan-dard in detecting the depth of caries were 0.504, 0.557 and 0.454, respectively. In detection of caries, the indexes were 0.571, 0.553 and 0.527, respectively. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracy of camera images in caries detection was more than that of scanned images, but there was also a moderate consistency between them. The consistency of detecting the presence of caries was more than that of detecting their depths. It seems that both digital cameras and scanners can be used interchangeably.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3463097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34630972012-12-10 Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries Valizadeh, Solmaz Tavakoli, Mohammad Amin Zarabian, Tara Esmaeili, Farzad J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Digital radiographs have some advantages over conventional ones. Application of digital recep-tors is not routine yet. Therefore, there is a need for digitizing conventional radiographs. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional radiographs by scanner and camera in detection of proximal car-ies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and sixteen surfaces of 158 extracted posterior teeth were radiographed. The radiographs were digitized using a digital camera and a scanner. Five observers scored the images for the presence and depth of caries. Histopathologic sections were the gold standard. Kappa agreement coefficient was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Kappa agreement coefficients between the camera and the scanner and also between each one with the gold stan-dard in detecting the depth of caries were 0.504, 0.557 and 0.454, respectively. In detection of caries, the indexes were 0.571, 0.553 and 0.527, respectively. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracy of camera images in caries detection was more than that of scanned images, but there was also a moderate consistency between them. The consistency of detecting the presence of caries was more than that of detecting their depths. It seems that both digital cameras and scanners can be used interchangeably. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2009 2009-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3463097/ /pubmed/23230500 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2009.031 Text en © 2009 The Authors; Tabriz University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Valizadeh, Solmaz
Tavakoli, Mohammad Amin
Zarabian, Tara
Esmaeili, Farzad
Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries
title Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries
title_full Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries
title_fullStr Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries
title_short Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional radiographs by camera and scanner in detection of proximal caries
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23230500
http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2009.031
work_keys_str_mv AT valizadehsolmaz diagnosticaccuracyofdigitizedconventionalradiographsbycameraandscannerindetectionofproximalcaries
AT tavakolimohammadamin diagnosticaccuracyofdigitizedconventionalradiographsbycameraandscannerindetectionofproximalcaries
AT zarabiantara diagnosticaccuracyofdigitizedconventionalradiographsbycameraandscannerindetectionofproximalcaries
AT esmaeilifarzad diagnosticaccuracyofdigitizedconventionalradiographsbycameraandscannerindetectionofproximalcaries