Cargando…

Initial Experience in Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Indications, Potential Benefits, and Limitations

Background. Single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic liver resection (SITLLR) has been recently described in limited series. We report our experience in SITLLR and discuss the future of this approach in terms of indications, potential benefits, and limitations, with a special reference to laparos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dapri, Giovanni, DiMarco, Livia, Cadière, Guy-Bernard, Donckier, Vincent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23082044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/921973
_version_ 1782245268557660160
author Dapri, Giovanni
DiMarco, Livia
Cadière, Guy-Bernard
Donckier, Vincent
author_facet Dapri, Giovanni
DiMarco, Livia
Cadière, Guy-Bernard
Donckier, Vincent
author_sort Dapri, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description Background. Single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic liver resection (SITLLR) has been recently described in limited series. We report our experience in SITLLR and discuss the future of this approach in terms of indications, potential benefits, and limitations, with a special reference to laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). Patients and Methods. Six patients underwent SITLLR. Indications were biliary cysts (3 cases), hydatid cysts (2), and colorectal liver metastasis (1). Procedures consisted in cysts unroofing, left lateral lobectomy, pericystectomy, and wedge resection. SITLLR was performed with 11 mm reusable trocar, 10 or 5 mm 30° scopes, 10 mm ultrasound probe, curved reusable instruments, and straight disposable bipolar shears. Results. Neither conversion to open surgery nor insertion of supplementary trocars was necessary. Median laparoscopic time was 105.5 minutes and median blood loss 275 mL. Median final umbilical scar length was 1.5 cm, and median length of stay was 4 days. No early or late complications occurred. Conclusion. SITLLR remains a challenging procedure. It is feasible in highly selected patients, requiring experience in hepatobiliary and laparoscopic surgery and skills in single-incision laparoscopy. Apart from cosmetic benefit, our experience and literature review did not show significant advantages if compared with multiport LLR, underlying that specific indications remain to be established.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3463174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34631742012-10-18 Initial Experience in Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Indications, Potential Benefits, and Limitations Dapri, Giovanni DiMarco, Livia Cadière, Guy-Bernard Donckier, Vincent HPB Surg Clinical Study Background. Single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic liver resection (SITLLR) has been recently described in limited series. We report our experience in SITLLR and discuss the future of this approach in terms of indications, potential benefits, and limitations, with a special reference to laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). Patients and Methods. Six patients underwent SITLLR. Indications were biliary cysts (3 cases), hydatid cysts (2), and colorectal liver metastasis (1). Procedures consisted in cysts unroofing, left lateral lobectomy, pericystectomy, and wedge resection. SITLLR was performed with 11 mm reusable trocar, 10 or 5 mm 30° scopes, 10 mm ultrasound probe, curved reusable instruments, and straight disposable bipolar shears. Results. Neither conversion to open surgery nor insertion of supplementary trocars was necessary. Median laparoscopic time was 105.5 minutes and median blood loss 275 mL. Median final umbilical scar length was 1.5 cm, and median length of stay was 4 days. No early or late complications occurred. Conclusion. SITLLR remains a challenging procedure. It is feasible in highly selected patients, requiring experience in hepatobiliary and laparoscopic surgery and skills in single-incision laparoscopy. Apart from cosmetic benefit, our experience and literature review did not show significant advantages if compared with multiport LLR, underlying that specific indications remain to be established. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3463174/ /pubmed/23082044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/921973 Text en Copyright © 2012 Giovanni Dapri et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Dapri, Giovanni
DiMarco, Livia
Cadière, Guy-Bernard
Donckier, Vincent
Initial Experience in Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Indications, Potential Benefits, and Limitations
title Initial Experience in Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Indications, Potential Benefits, and Limitations
title_full Initial Experience in Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Indications, Potential Benefits, and Limitations
title_fullStr Initial Experience in Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Indications, Potential Benefits, and Limitations
title_full_unstemmed Initial Experience in Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Indications, Potential Benefits, and Limitations
title_short Initial Experience in Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Indications, Potential Benefits, and Limitations
title_sort initial experience in single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic liver resection: indications, potential benefits, and limitations
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23082044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/921973
work_keys_str_mv AT daprigiovanni initialexperienceinsingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicliverresectionindicationspotentialbenefitsandlimitations
AT dimarcolivia initialexperienceinsingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicliverresectionindicationspotentialbenefitsandlimitations
AT cadiereguybernard initialexperienceinsingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicliverresectionindicationspotentialbenefitsandlimitations
AT donckiervincent initialexperienceinsingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicliverresectionindicationspotentialbenefitsandlimitations