Cargando…

Classification of Older Adults Who Have Diabetes by Comorbid Conditions, United States, 2005–2006

INTRODUCTION: Older adults who have diabetes vary widely in terms of comorbid conditions; these conditions help determine the risks and benefits of intensive glycemic control. Not all people benefit from intensive glycemic control. The objective of this study was to classify by comorbid conditions o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laiteerapong, Neda, Iveniuk, James, John, Priya M., Laumann, Edward O., Huang, Elbert S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22595321
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd9.110287
_version_ 1782245278814830592
author Laiteerapong, Neda
Iveniuk, James
John, Priya M.
Laumann, Edward O.
Huang, Elbert S.
author_facet Laiteerapong, Neda
Iveniuk, James
John, Priya M.
Laumann, Edward O.
Huang, Elbert S.
author_sort Laiteerapong, Neda
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Older adults who have diabetes vary widely in terms of comorbid conditions; these conditions help determine the risks and benefits of intensive glycemic control. Not all people benefit from intensive glycemic control. The objective of this study was to classify by comorbid conditions older American adults who have diabetes to identify those who are less likely to benefit from intensive glycemic control. METHODS: We used latent class analysis to identify subgroups of a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling older adults (aged 57–85 y) who have diabetes (n = 750). The subgroups were classified according to 14 comorbid conditions prevalent in the older population. Using the Akaike Information Criterion, the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), the sample-size adjusted BIC, and the χ(2) goodness-of-fit statistic, we assessed model fit. RESULTS: We found 3 distinct subgroups. Class 1 (63% of the sample) had the lowest probabilities for most conditions. Class 2 (29% of the sample) had the highest probabilities of cancer, incontinence, and kidney disease. Class 3 (9% of the sample) had the highest probabilities (>90%) of congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction. Class 1 had only 0, 1, or 2 comorbid conditions, and both class 2 and class 3 had 6 or more comorbid conditions. The 5-year death rates for class 2 (17%) and class 3 (33%) were higher than the rate for class 1 (9%). CONCLUSION: Older adults who have diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and 6 or more comorbid conditions may represent a subgroup of older adults who are less likely to benefit from intensive glycemic control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3463415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34634152012-11-13 Classification of Older Adults Who Have Diabetes by Comorbid Conditions, United States, 2005–2006 Laiteerapong, Neda Iveniuk, James John, Priya M. Laumann, Edward O. Huang, Elbert S. Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Older adults who have diabetes vary widely in terms of comorbid conditions; these conditions help determine the risks and benefits of intensive glycemic control. Not all people benefit from intensive glycemic control. The objective of this study was to classify by comorbid conditions older American adults who have diabetes to identify those who are less likely to benefit from intensive glycemic control. METHODS: We used latent class analysis to identify subgroups of a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling older adults (aged 57–85 y) who have diabetes (n = 750). The subgroups were classified according to 14 comorbid conditions prevalent in the older population. Using the Akaike Information Criterion, the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), the sample-size adjusted BIC, and the χ(2) goodness-of-fit statistic, we assessed model fit. RESULTS: We found 3 distinct subgroups. Class 1 (63% of the sample) had the lowest probabilities for most conditions. Class 2 (29% of the sample) had the highest probabilities of cancer, incontinence, and kidney disease. Class 3 (9% of the sample) had the highest probabilities (>90%) of congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction. Class 1 had only 0, 1, or 2 comorbid conditions, and both class 2 and class 3 had 6 or more comorbid conditions. The 5-year death rates for class 2 (17%) and class 3 (33%) were higher than the rate for class 1 (9%). CONCLUSION: Older adults who have diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and 6 or more comorbid conditions may represent a subgroup of older adults who are less likely to benefit from intensive glycemic control. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2012-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3463415/ /pubmed/22595321 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd9.110287 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Laiteerapong, Neda
Iveniuk, James
John, Priya M.
Laumann, Edward O.
Huang, Elbert S.
Classification of Older Adults Who Have Diabetes by Comorbid Conditions, United States, 2005–2006
title Classification of Older Adults Who Have Diabetes by Comorbid Conditions, United States, 2005–2006
title_full Classification of Older Adults Who Have Diabetes by Comorbid Conditions, United States, 2005–2006
title_fullStr Classification of Older Adults Who Have Diabetes by Comorbid Conditions, United States, 2005–2006
title_full_unstemmed Classification of Older Adults Who Have Diabetes by Comorbid Conditions, United States, 2005–2006
title_short Classification of Older Adults Who Have Diabetes by Comorbid Conditions, United States, 2005–2006
title_sort classification of older adults who have diabetes by comorbid conditions, united states, 2005–2006
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22595321
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd9.110287
work_keys_str_mv AT laiteerapongneda classificationofolderadultswhohavediabetesbycomorbidconditionsunitedstates20052006
AT iveniukjames classificationofolderadultswhohavediabetesbycomorbidconditionsunitedstates20052006
AT johnpriyam classificationofolderadultswhohavediabetesbycomorbidconditionsunitedstates20052006
AT laumannedwardo classificationofolderadultswhohavediabetesbycomorbidconditionsunitedstates20052006
AT huangelberts classificationofolderadultswhohavediabetesbycomorbidconditionsunitedstates20052006