Cargando…

Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the Actigraph activity monitor

BACKGROUND: More studies include multiple generations of the Actigraph activity monitor. So far no studies have compared the output including the newest generation and investigated the impact on the output of the activity monitor when enabling the low frequency extension (LFE) option. The aims were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ried-Larsen, Mathias, Brønd, Jan Christian, Brage, Søren, Hansen, Bjørge Herman, Grydeland, May, Andersen, Lars Bo, Møller, Niels Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22971175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-113
_version_ 1782245285986041856
author Ried-Larsen, Mathias
Brønd, Jan Christian
Brage, Søren
Hansen, Bjørge Herman
Grydeland, May
Andersen, Lars Bo
Møller, Niels Christian
author_facet Ried-Larsen, Mathias
Brønd, Jan Christian
Brage, Søren
Hansen, Bjørge Herman
Grydeland, May
Andersen, Lars Bo
Møller, Niels Christian
author_sort Ried-Larsen, Mathias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: More studies include multiple generations of the Actigraph activity monitor. So far no studies have compared the output including the newest generation and investigated the impact on the output of the activity monitor when enabling the low frequency extension (LFE) option. The aims were to study the responses of four generations (AM7164, GT1M, GT3X and GT3X+) of the Actigraph activity monitor in a mechanical setup and a free living environment with and without enabling the LFE option. METHODS: The monitors were oscillated in a mechanical setup using two radii in the frequency range 0.25-3.0 Hz. Following the mechanical study a convenience sample (N = 20) wore three monitors (one AM7164 and two GT3X) for 24 hours. RESULTS: The AM7164 differed from the newer generations across frequencies (p < 0.05) in the mechanical setup. The AM7164 produced a higher output at the lower and at the highest intensities, whereas the output was lower at the middle intensities in the mid-range compared to the newer generations. The LFE option decreased the differences at the lower frequencies, but increased differences at the higher. In free living, the mean physical activity level (PA) of the GT3X was 18 counts per minute (CPM) (8%) lower compared to the AM7164 (p < 0.001). Time spent in sedentary intensity was 26.6 minutes (95% CI 15.6 to 35.3) higher when assessed by the GT3X compared to the AM7164 (p < 0.001). Time spend in light and vigorous PA were 23.3 minutes (95% CI 31.8 to 14.8) and 11.7 minutes (95% CI 2.8 to 0.7) lower when assessed by the GT3X compared to the AM7164 (p < 0.05). When enabling the LFE the differences in the sedentary and light PA intensity (<333 counts*10 sec(-1)) were attenuated (p > 0.05 for differences between generations) thus attenuated the difference in mean PA (p > 0.05) when the LFE option was enabled. However, it did not attenuate the difference in time spend in vigorous PA and it introduced a difference in time spend in moderate PA (+ 3.0 min (95% CI 0.4 to 5.6)) between the generations. CONCLUSION: We observed significant differences between the AM7164 and the newer Actigraph GT-generations (GT1M, GT3X and GT3X+) in a mechanical setup and in free-living. Enabling the LFE option attenuated the differences in mean PA completely, but induced a bias in the moderate PA intensities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3463450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34634502012-10-05 Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the Actigraph activity monitor Ried-Larsen, Mathias Brønd, Jan Christian Brage, Søren Hansen, Bjørge Herman Grydeland, May Andersen, Lars Bo Møller, Niels Christian Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: More studies include multiple generations of the Actigraph activity monitor. So far no studies have compared the output including the newest generation and investigated the impact on the output of the activity monitor when enabling the low frequency extension (LFE) option. The aims were to study the responses of four generations (AM7164, GT1M, GT3X and GT3X+) of the Actigraph activity monitor in a mechanical setup and a free living environment with and without enabling the LFE option. METHODS: The monitors were oscillated in a mechanical setup using two radii in the frequency range 0.25-3.0 Hz. Following the mechanical study a convenience sample (N = 20) wore three monitors (one AM7164 and two GT3X) for 24 hours. RESULTS: The AM7164 differed from the newer generations across frequencies (p < 0.05) in the mechanical setup. The AM7164 produced a higher output at the lower and at the highest intensities, whereas the output was lower at the middle intensities in the mid-range compared to the newer generations. The LFE option decreased the differences at the lower frequencies, but increased differences at the higher. In free living, the mean physical activity level (PA) of the GT3X was 18 counts per minute (CPM) (8%) lower compared to the AM7164 (p < 0.001). Time spent in sedentary intensity was 26.6 minutes (95% CI 15.6 to 35.3) higher when assessed by the GT3X compared to the AM7164 (p < 0.001). Time spend in light and vigorous PA were 23.3 minutes (95% CI 31.8 to 14.8) and 11.7 minutes (95% CI 2.8 to 0.7) lower when assessed by the GT3X compared to the AM7164 (p < 0.05). When enabling the LFE the differences in the sedentary and light PA intensity (<333 counts*10 sec(-1)) were attenuated (p > 0.05 for differences between generations) thus attenuated the difference in mean PA (p > 0.05) when the LFE option was enabled. However, it did not attenuate the difference in time spend in vigorous PA and it introduced a difference in time spend in moderate PA (+ 3.0 min (95% CI 0.4 to 5.6)) between the generations. CONCLUSION: We observed significant differences between the AM7164 and the newer Actigraph GT-generations (GT1M, GT3X and GT3X+) in a mechanical setup and in free-living. Enabling the LFE option attenuated the differences in mean PA completely, but induced a bias in the moderate PA intensities. BioMed Central 2012-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3463450/ /pubmed/22971175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-113 Text en Copyright © 2012 Ried-Larsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ried-Larsen, Mathias
Brønd, Jan Christian
Brage, Søren
Hansen, Bjørge Herman
Grydeland, May
Andersen, Lars Bo
Møller, Niels Christian
Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the Actigraph activity monitor
title Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the Actigraph activity monitor
title_full Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the Actigraph activity monitor
title_fullStr Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the Actigraph activity monitor
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the Actigraph activity monitor
title_short Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the Actigraph activity monitor
title_sort mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the actigraph activity monitor
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22971175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-113
work_keys_str_mv AT riedlarsenmathias mechanicalandfreelivingcomparisonsoffourgenerationsoftheactigraphactivitymonitor
AT brøndjanchristian mechanicalandfreelivingcomparisonsoffourgenerationsoftheactigraphactivitymonitor
AT bragesøren mechanicalandfreelivingcomparisonsoffourgenerationsoftheactigraphactivitymonitor
AT hansenbjørgeherman mechanicalandfreelivingcomparisonsoffourgenerationsoftheactigraphactivitymonitor
AT grydelandmay mechanicalandfreelivingcomparisonsoffourgenerationsoftheactigraphactivitymonitor
AT andersenlarsbo mechanicalandfreelivingcomparisonsoffourgenerationsoftheactigraphactivitymonitor
AT møllernielschristian mechanicalandfreelivingcomparisonsoffourgenerationsoftheactigraphactivitymonitor