Cargando…

Statistical Analysis of Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses: A Comparison of Methods and Recommendations for Practice

BACKGROUND: Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses that obtain “raw” data from studies rather than summary data typically adopt a “two-stage” approach to analysis whereby IPD within trials generate summary measures, which are combined using standard meta-analytical methods. Recently, a rang...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stewart, Gavin B., Altman, Douglas G., Askie, Lisa M., Duley, Lelia, Simmonds, Mark C., Stewart, Lesley A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23056232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046042
_version_ 1782245312900890624
author Stewart, Gavin B.
Altman, Douglas G.
Askie, Lisa M.
Duley, Lelia
Simmonds, Mark C.
Stewart, Lesley A.
author_facet Stewart, Gavin B.
Altman, Douglas G.
Askie, Lisa M.
Duley, Lelia
Simmonds, Mark C.
Stewart, Lesley A.
author_sort Stewart, Gavin B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses that obtain “raw” data from studies rather than summary data typically adopt a “two-stage” approach to analysis whereby IPD within trials generate summary measures, which are combined using standard meta-analytical methods. Recently, a range of “one-stage” approaches which combine all individual participant data in a single meta-analysis have been suggested as providing a more powerful and flexible approach. However, they are more complex to implement and require statistical support. This study uses a dataset to compare “two-stage” and “one-stage” models of varying complexity, to ascertain whether results obtained from the approaches differ in a clinically meaningful way. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We included data from 24 randomised controlled trials, evaluating antiplatelet agents, for the prevention of pre-eclampsia in pregnancy. We performed two-stage and one-stage IPD meta-analyses to estimate overall treatment effect and to explore potential treatment interactions whereby particular types of women and their babies might benefit differentially from receiving antiplatelets. Two-stage and one-stage approaches gave similar results, showing a benefit of using anti-platelets (Relative risk 0.90, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.97). Neither approach suggested that any particular type of women benefited more or less from antiplatelets. There were no material differences in results between different types of one-stage model. CONCLUSIONS: For these data, two-stage and one-stage approaches to analysis produce similar results. Although one-stage models offer a flexible environment for exploring model structure and are useful where across study patterns relating to types of participant, intervention and outcome mask similar relationships within trials, the additional insights provided by their usage may not outweigh the costs of statistical support for routine application in syntheses of randomised controlled trials. Researchers considering undertaking an IPD meta-analysis should not necessarily be deterred by a perceived need for sophisticated statistical methods when combining information from large randomised trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3463584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34635842012-10-09 Statistical Analysis of Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses: A Comparison of Methods and Recommendations for Practice Stewart, Gavin B. Altman, Douglas G. Askie, Lisa M. Duley, Lelia Simmonds, Mark C. Stewart, Lesley A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses that obtain “raw” data from studies rather than summary data typically adopt a “two-stage” approach to analysis whereby IPD within trials generate summary measures, which are combined using standard meta-analytical methods. Recently, a range of “one-stage” approaches which combine all individual participant data in a single meta-analysis have been suggested as providing a more powerful and flexible approach. However, they are more complex to implement and require statistical support. This study uses a dataset to compare “two-stage” and “one-stage” models of varying complexity, to ascertain whether results obtained from the approaches differ in a clinically meaningful way. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We included data from 24 randomised controlled trials, evaluating antiplatelet agents, for the prevention of pre-eclampsia in pregnancy. We performed two-stage and one-stage IPD meta-analyses to estimate overall treatment effect and to explore potential treatment interactions whereby particular types of women and their babies might benefit differentially from receiving antiplatelets. Two-stage and one-stage approaches gave similar results, showing a benefit of using anti-platelets (Relative risk 0.90, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.97). Neither approach suggested that any particular type of women benefited more or less from antiplatelets. There were no material differences in results between different types of one-stage model. CONCLUSIONS: For these data, two-stage and one-stage approaches to analysis produce similar results. Although one-stage models offer a flexible environment for exploring model structure and are useful where across study patterns relating to types of participant, intervention and outcome mask similar relationships within trials, the additional insights provided by their usage may not outweigh the costs of statistical support for routine application in syntheses of randomised controlled trials. Researchers considering undertaking an IPD meta-analysis should not necessarily be deterred by a perceived need for sophisticated statistical methods when combining information from large randomised trials. Public Library of Science 2012-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3463584/ /pubmed/23056232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046042 Text en © 2012 Stewart et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stewart, Gavin B.
Altman, Douglas G.
Askie, Lisa M.
Duley, Lelia
Simmonds, Mark C.
Stewart, Lesley A.
Statistical Analysis of Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses: A Comparison of Methods and Recommendations for Practice
title Statistical Analysis of Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses: A Comparison of Methods and Recommendations for Practice
title_full Statistical Analysis of Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses: A Comparison of Methods and Recommendations for Practice
title_fullStr Statistical Analysis of Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses: A Comparison of Methods and Recommendations for Practice
title_full_unstemmed Statistical Analysis of Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses: A Comparison of Methods and Recommendations for Practice
title_short Statistical Analysis of Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses: A Comparison of Methods and Recommendations for Practice
title_sort statistical analysis of individual participant data meta-analyses: a comparison of methods and recommendations for practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23056232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046042
work_keys_str_mv AT stewartgavinb statisticalanalysisofindividualparticipantdatametaanalysesacomparisonofmethodsandrecommendationsforpractice
AT altmandouglasg statisticalanalysisofindividualparticipantdatametaanalysesacomparisonofmethodsandrecommendationsforpractice
AT askielisam statisticalanalysisofindividualparticipantdatametaanalysesacomparisonofmethodsandrecommendationsforpractice
AT duleylelia statisticalanalysisofindividualparticipantdatametaanalysesacomparisonofmethodsandrecommendationsforpractice
AT simmondsmarkc statisticalanalysisofindividualparticipantdatametaanalysesacomparisonofmethodsandrecommendationsforpractice
AT stewartlesleya statisticalanalysisofindividualparticipantdatametaanalysesacomparisonofmethodsandrecommendationsforpractice