Cargando…

In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography

This study sought to compare lumen dimensions as assessed by 3D quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT), and to assess the association of the discrepancy with vessel curvature. Coronary lumen dimensions often show discrepan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tu, Shengxian, Xu, Liang, Ligthart, Jurgen, Xu, Bo, Witberg, Karen, Sun, Zhongwei, Koning, Gerhard, Reiber, Johan H. C., Regar, Evelyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22261998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0016-6
_version_ 1782245323737923584
author Tu, Shengxian
Xu, Liang
Ligthart, Jurgen
Xu, Bo
Witberg, Karen
Sun, Zhongwei
Koning, Gerhard
Reiber, Johan H. C.
Regar, Evelyn
author_facet Tu, Shengxian
Xu, Liang
Ligthart, Jurgen
Xu, Bo
Witberg, Karen
Sun, Zhongwei
Koning, Gerhard
Reiber, Johan H. C.
Regar, Evelyn
author_sort Tu, Shengxian
collection PubMed
description This study sought to compare lumen dimensions as assessed by 3D quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT), and to assess the association of the discrepancy with vessel curvature. Coronary lumen dimensions often show discrepancies when assessed by X-ray angiography and by IVUS or OCT. One source of error concerns a possible mismatch in the selection of corresponding regions for the comparison. Therefore, we developed a novel, real-time co-registration approach to guarantee the point-to-point correspondence between the X-ray, IVUS and OCT images. A total of 74 patients with indication for cardiac catheterization were retrospectively included. Lumen morphometry was performed by 3D QCA and IVUS or OCT. For quantitative analysis, a novel, dedicated approach for co-registration and lumen detection was employed allowing for assessment of lumen size at multiple positions along the vessel. Vessel curvature was automatically calculated from the 3D arterial vessel centerline. Comparison of 3D QCA and IVUS was performed in 519 distinct positions in 40 vessels. Correlations were r = 0.761, r = 0.790, and r = 0.799 for short diameter (SD), long diameter (LD), and area, respectively. Lumen sizes were larger by IVUS (P < 0.001): SD, 2.51 ± 0.58 mm versus 2.34 ± 0.56 mm; LD, 3.02 ± 0.62 mm versus 2.63 ± 0.58 mm; Area, 6.29 ± 2.77 mm(2) versus 5.08 ± 2.34 mm(2). Comparison of 3D QCA and OCT was performed in 541 distinct positions in 40 vessels. Correlations were r = 0.880, r = 0.881, and r = 0.897 for SD, LD, and area, respectively. Lumen sizes were larger by OCT (P < 0.001): SD, 2.70 ± 0.65 mm versus 2.57 ± 0.61 mm; LD, 3.11 ± 0.72 mm versus 2.80 ± 0.62 mm; Area 7.01 ± 3.28 mm(2) versus 5.93 ± 2.66 mm(2). The vessel-based discrepancy between 3D QCA and IVUS or OCT long diameters increased with increasing vessel curvature. In conclusion, our comparison of co-registered 3D QCA and invasive imaging data suggests a bias towards larger lumen dimensions by IVUS and by OCT, which was more pronounced in larger and tortuous vessels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3463784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34637842012-10-04 In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography Tu, Shengxian Xu, Liang Ligthart, Jurgen Xu, Bo Witberg, Karen Sun, Zhongwei Koning, Gerhard Reiber, Johan H. C. Regar, Evelyn Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper This study sought to compare lumen dimensions as assessed by 3D quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT), and to assess the association of the discrepancy with vessel curvature. Coronary lumen dimensions often show discrepancies when assessed by X-ray angiography and by IVUS or OCT. One source of error concerns a possible mismatch in the selection of corresponding regions for the comparison. Therefore, we developed a novel, real-time co-registration approach to guarantee the point-to-point correspondence between the X-ray, IVUS and OCT images. A total of 74 patients with indication for cardiac catheterization were retrospectively included. Lumen morphometry was performed by 3D QCA and IVUS or OCT. For quantitative analysis, a novel, dedicated approach for co-registration and lumen detection was employed allowing for assessment of lumen size at multiple positions along the vessel. Vessel curvature was automatically calculated from the 3D arterial vessel centerline. Comparison of 3D QCA and IVUS was performed in 519 distinct positions in 40 vessels. Correlations were r = 0.761, r = 0.790, and r = 0.799 for short diameter (SD), long diameter (LD), and area, respectively. Lumen sizes were larger by IVUS (P < 0.001): SD, 2.51 ± 0.58 mm versus 2.34 ± 0.56 mm; LD, 3.02 ± 0.62 mm versus 2.63 ± 0.58 mm; Area, 6.29 ± 2.77 mm(2) versus 5.08 ± 2.34 mm(2). Comparison of 3D QCA and OCT was performed in 541 distinct positions in 40 vessels. Correlations were r = 0.880, r = 0.881, and r = 0.897 for SD, LD, and area, respectively. Lumen sizes were larger by OCT (P < 0.001): SD, 2.70 ± 0.65 mm versus 2.57 ± 0.61 mm; LD, 3.11 ± 0.72 mm versus 2.80 ± 0.62 mm; Area 7.01 ± 3.28 mm(2) versus 5.93 ± 2.66 mm(2). The vessel-based discrepancy between 3D QCA and IVUS or OCT long diameters increased with increasing vessel curvature. In conclusion, our comparison of co-registered 3D QCA and invasive imaging data suggests a bias towards larger lumen dimensions by IVUS and by OCT, which was more pronounced in larger and tortuous vessels. Springer Netherlands 2012-01-20 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3463784/ /pubmed/22261998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0016-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Tu, Shengxian
Xu, Liang
Ligthart, Jurgen
Xu, Bo
Witberg, Karen
Sun, Zhongwei
Koning, Gerhard
Reiber, Johan H. C.
Regar, Evelyn
In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography
title In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography
title_full In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography
title_fullStr In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography
title_full_unstemmed In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography
title_short In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography
title_sort in vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3d) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22261998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0016-6
work_keys_str_mv AT tushengxian invivocomparisonofarteriallumendimensionsassessedbycoregisteredthreedimensional3dquantitativecoronaryangiographyintravascularultrasoundandopticalcoherencetomography
AT xuliang invivocomparisonofarteriallumendimensionsassessedbycoregisteredthreedimensional3dquantitativecoronaryangiographyintravascularultrasoundandopticalcoherencetomography
AT ligthartjurgen invivocomparisonofarteriallumendimensionsassessedbycoregisteredthreedimensional3dquantitativecoronaryangiographyintravascularultrasoundandopticalcoherencetomography
AT xubo invivocomparisonofarteriallumendimensionsassessedbycoregisteredthreedimensional3dquantitativecoronaryangiographyintravascularultrasoundandopticalcoherencetomography
AT witbergkaren invivocomparisonofarteriallumendimensionsassessedbycoregisteredthreedimensional3dquantitativecoronaryangiographyintravascularultrasoundandopticalcoherencetomography
AT sunzhongwei invivocomparisonofarteriallumendimensionsassessedbycoregisteredthreedimensional3dquantitativecoronaryangiographyintravascularultrasoundandopticalcoherencetomography
AT koninggerhard invivocomparisonofarteriallumendimensionsassessedbycoregisteredthreedimensional3dquantitativecoronaryangiographyintravascularultrasoundandopticalcoherencetomography
AT reiberjohanhc invivocomparisonofarteriallumendimensionsassessedbycoregisteredthreedimensional3dquantitativecoronaryangiographyintravascularultrasoundandopticalcoherencetomography
AT regarevelyn invivocomparisonofarteriallumendimensionsassessedbycoregisteredthreedimensional3dquantitativecoronaryangiographyintravascularultrasoundandopticalcoherencetomography