Cargando…

“Time is brain” the Gifford factor - or: Why do some civilian gunshot wounds to the head do unexpectedly well? A case series with outcomes analysis and a management guide

BACKGROUND: Review of intracranial gunshot wounds (GSWs) undergoing emergent neurosurgical intervention despite a very low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission in order to identify predictors of good outcome, with correlates to recent literature. METHODS: A retrospective review of select case...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, David J., Lam, Fred C., Siracuse, Jeffrey J., Thomas, Ajith, Kasper, Ekkehard M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23061014
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.100187
_version_ 1782245332713734144
author Lin, David J.
Lam, Fred C.
Siracuse, Jeffrey J.
Thomas, Ajith
Kasper, Ekkehard M.
author_facet Lin, David J.
Lam, Fred C.
Siracuse, Jeffrey J.
Thomas, Ajith
Kasper, Ekkehard M.
author_sort Lin, David J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Review of intracranial gunshot wounds (GSWs) undergoing emergent neurosurgical intervention despite a very low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission in order to identify predictors of good outcome, with correlates to recent literature. METHODS: A retrospective review of select cases of GSWs presenting to our trauma center over the past 5 years with poor GCS requiring emergent neurosurgical intervention and a minimum of 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Out of a total of 17 patients who went to the operating room (OR) for GSW to the head during this period, 4 cases with a GCS < 5 on admission were identified. All cases required a hemicraniectomy to alleviate cerebral swelling. Two cases presented with a unilaterally blown pupil due to raised intracranial pressure. The remaining 2 cases had equal and reactive pupils. One patient with a GCS of 3 and a significant bilateral pattern of parenchymal bullet injury was initially assessed in moribund status but rallied and received a delayed hemicraniectomy on day 7. Three out of 4 patients are functionally independent at 1-year follow-up. The fourth patient who received a delayed decompression remains wheelchair dependent. CONCLUSION: Victims of GSWs can have good outcomes despite having a very poor admission GCS score and papillary abnormalities. Factors predicting good outcomes include the following: time from injury to surgical intervention of < 1 h; injury to noneloquent brain; and absence of injury to midbrain, brainstem, and major vessels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3463834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34638342012-10-11 “Time is brain” the Gifford factor - or: Why do some civilian gunshot wounds to the head do unexpectedly well? A case series with outcomes analysis and a management guide Lin, David J. Lam, Fred C. Siracuse, Jeffrey J. Thomas, Ajith Kasper, Ekkehard M. Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Review of intracranial gunshot wounds (GSWs) undergoing emergent neurosurgical intervention despite a very low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission in order to identify predictors of good outcome, with correlates to recent literature. METHODS: A retrospective review of select cases of GSWs presenting to our trauma center over the past 5 years with poor GCS requiring emergent neurosurgical intervention and a minimum of 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Out of a total of 17 patients who went to the operating room (OR) for GSW to the head during this period, 4 cases with a GCS < 5 on admission were identified. All cases required a hemicraniectomy to alleviate cerebral swelling. Two cases presented with a unilaterally blown pupil due to raised intracranial pressure. The remaining 2 cases had equal and reactive pupils. One patient with a GCS of 3 and a significant bilateral pattern of parenchymal bullet injury was initially assessed in moribund status but rallied and received a delayed hemicraniectomy on day 7. Three out of 4 patients are functionally independent at 1-year follow-up. The fourth patient who received a delayed decompression remains wheelchair dependent. CONCLUSION: Victims of GSWs can have good outcomes despite having a very poor admission GCS score and papillary abnormalities. Factors predicting good outcomes include the following: time from injury to surgical intervention of < 1 h; injury to noneloquent brain; and absence of injury to midbrain, brainstem, and major vessels. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3463834/ /pubmed/23061014 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.100187 Text en Copyright: © 2012 Lin DJ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lin, David J.
Lam, Fred C.
Siracuse, Jeffrey J.
Thomas, Ajith
Kasper, Ekkehard M.
“Time is brain” the Gifford factor - or: Why do some civilian gunshot wounds to the head do unexpectedly well? A case series with outcomes analysis and a management guide
title “Time is brain” the Gifford factor - or: Why do some civilian gunshot wounds to the head do unexpectedly well? A case series with outcomes analysis and a management guide
title_full “Time is brain” the Gifford factor - or: Why do some civilian gunshot wounds to the head do unexpectedly well? A case series with outcomes analysis and a management guide
title_fullStr “Time is brain” the Gifford factor - or: Why do some civilian gunshot wounds to the head do unexpectedly well? A case series with outcomes analysis and a management guide
title_full_unstemmed “Time is brain” the Gifford factor - or: Why do some civilian gunshot wounds to the head do unexpectedly well? A case series with outcomes analysis and a management guide
title_short “Time is brain” the Gifford factor - or: Why do some civilian gunshot wounds to the head do unexpectedly well? A case series with outcomes analysis and a management guide
title_sort “time is brain” the gifford factor - or: why do some civilian gunshot wounds to the head do unexpectedly well? a case series with outcomes analysis and a management guide
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23061014
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.100187
work_keys_str_mv AT lindavidj timeisbrainthegiffordfactororwhydosomeciviliangunshotwoundstotheheaddounexpectedlywellacaseserieswithoutcomesanalysisandamanagementguide
AT lamfredc timeisbrainthegiffordfactororwhydosomeciviliangunshotwoundstotheheaddounexpectedlywellacaseserieswithoutcomesanalysisandamanagementguide
AT siracusejeffreyj timeisbrainthegiffordfactororwhydosomeciviliangunshotwoundstotheheaddounexpectedlywellacaseserieswithoutcomesanalysisandamanagementguide
AT thomasajith timeisbrainthegiffordfactororwhydosomeciviliangunshotwoundstotheheaddounexpectedlywellacaseserieswithoutcomesanalysisandamanagementguide
AT kasperekkehardm timeisbrainthegiffordfactororwhydosomeciviliangunshotwoundstotheheaddounexpectedlywellacaseserieswithoutcomesanalysisandamanagementguide