Cargando…

A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients

AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution with those of 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution in dry eye patients, using mean changes in fluorescein and rose bengal staining scores as endpoints. TRIAL DESIGN AND METHODS: In this multicenter, randomised, doub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takamura, Etsuko, Tsubota, Kazuo, Watanabe, Hitoshi, Ohashi, Yuichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22914501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301448
_version_ 1782245335601512448
author Takamura, Etsuko
Tsubota, Kazuo
Watanabe, Hitoshi
Ohashi, Yuichi
author_facet Takamura, Etsuko
Tsubota, Kazuo
Watanabe, Hitoshi
Ohashi, Yuichi
author_sort Takamura, Etsuko
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution with those of 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution in dry eye patients, using mean changes in fluorescein and rose bengal staining scores as endpoints. TRIAL DESIGN AND METHODS: In this multicenter, randomised, double-masked, parallel study of 286 dry eye patients with fluorescein and rose bengal staining scores of ≥3 were randomised to the treatment groups in a 1 : 1 ratio. Efficacy and safety were evaluated after drop-wise instillation of the study drug, six times daily for 4 weeks. RESULTS: After 4 weeks, the intergroup difference in the mean change from baseline in fluorescein staining score was −0.03; this verified the non-inferiority of diquafosol. The mean change from baseline in rose bengal staining score was significantly lower in the diquafosol group (p=0.010), thus verifying its superiority. The incidence of adverse events was 26.4% and 18.9% in the diquafosol and sodium hyaluronate groups, respectively, with no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Diquafosol (3%) and sodium hyaluronate (0.1%) exhibit similar efficacy in improving fluorescein staining scores of dry eye patients, whereas, diquafosol exhibits superior efficacy in improving rose bengal staining scores. Diquafosol has high clinical efficacy and is well tolerated with a good safety profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3463860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34638602012-10-04 A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients Takamura, Etsuko Tsubota, Kazuo Watanabe, Hitoshi Ohashi, Yuichi Br J Ophthalmol Original Articles AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution with those of 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution in dry eye patients, using mean changes in fluorescein and rose bengal staining scores as endpoints. TRIAL DESIGN AND METHODS: In this multicenter, randomised, double-masked, parallel study of 286 dry eye patients with fluorescein and rose bengal staining scores of ≥3 were randomised to the treatment groups in a 1 : 1 ratio. Efficacy and safety were evaluated after drop-wise instillation of the study drug, six times daily for 4 weeks. RESULTS: After 4 weeks, the intergroup difference in the mean change from baseline in fluorescein staining score was −0.03; this verified the non-inferiority of diquafosol. The mean change from baseline in rose bengal staining score was significantly lower in the diquafosol group (p=0.010), thus verifying its superiority. The incidence of adverse events was 26.4% and 18.9% in the diquafosol and sodium hyaluronate groups, respectively, with no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Diquafosol (3%) and sodium hyaluronate (0.1%) exhibit similar efficacy in improving fluorescein staining scores of dry eye patients, whereas, diquafosol exhibits superior efficacy in improving rose bengal staining scores. Diquafosol has high clinical efficacy and is well tolerated with a good safety profile. BMJ Group 2012-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3463860/ /pubmed/22914501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301448 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Original Articles
Takamura, Etsuko
Tsubota, Kazuo
Watanabe, Hitoshi
Ohashi, Yuichi
A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients
title A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients
title_full A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients
title_fullStr A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients
title_full_unstemmed A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients
title_short A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients
title_sort randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22914501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301448
work_keys_str_mv AT takamuraetsuko arandomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients
AT tsubotakazuo arandomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients
AT watanabehitoshi arandomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients
AT ohashiyuichi arandomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients
AT arandomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients
AT takamuraetsuko randomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients
AT tsubotakazuo randomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients
AT watanabehitoshi randomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients
AT ohashiyuichi randomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients
AT randomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients