Cargando…
A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients
AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution with those of 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution in dry eye patients, using mean changes in fluorescein and rose bengal staining scores as endpoints. TRIAL DESIGN AND METHODS: In this multicenter, randomised, doub...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22914501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301448 |
_version_ | 1782245335601512448 |
---|---|
author | Takamura, Etsuko Tsubota, Kazuo Watanabe, Hitoshi Ohashi, Yuichi |
author_facet | Takamura, Etsuko Tsubota, Kazuo Watanabe, Hitoshi Ohashi, Yuichi |
author_sort | Takamura, Etsuko |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution with those of 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution in dry eye patients, using mean changes in fluorescein and rose bengal staining scores as endpoints. TRIAL DESIGN AND METHODS: In this multicenter, randomised, double-masked, parallel study of 286 dry eye patients with fluorescein and rose bengal staining scores of ≥3 were randomised to the treatment groups in a 1 : 1 ratio. Efficacy and safety were evaluated after drop-wise instillation of the study drug, six times daily for 4 weeks. RESULTS: After 4 weeks, the intergroup difference in the mean change from baseline in fluorescein staining score was −0.03; this verified the non-inferiority of diquafosol. The mean change from baseline in rose bengal staining score was significantly lower in the diquafosol group (p=0.010), thus verifying its superiority. The incidence of adverse events was 26.4% and 18.9% in the diquafosol and sodium hyaluronate groups, respectively, with no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Diquafosol (3%) and sodium hyaluronate (0.1%) exhibit similar efficacy in improving fluorescein staining scores of dry eye patients, whereas, diquafosol exhibits superior efficacy in improving rose bengal staining scores. Diquafosol has high clinical efficacy and is well tolerated with a good safety profile. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3463860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34638602012-10-04 A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients Takamura, Etsuko Tsubota, Kazuo Watanabe, Hitoshi Ohashi, Yuichi Br J Ophthalmol Original Articles AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution with those of 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution in dry eye patients, using mean changes in fluorescein and rose bengal staining scores as endpoints. TRIAL DESIGN AND METHODS: In this multicenter, randomised, double-masked, parallel study of 286 dry eye patients with fluorescein and rose bengal staining scores of ≥3 were randomised to the treatment groups in a 1 : 1 ratio. Efficacy and safety were evaluated after drop-wise instillation of the study drug, six times daily for 4 weeks. RESULTS: After 4 weeks, the intergroup difference in the mean change from baseline in fluorescein staining score was −0.03; this verified the non-inferiority of diquafosol. The mean change from baseline in rose bengal staining score was significantly lower in the diquafosol group (p=0.010), thus verifying its superiority. The incidence of adverse events was 26.4% and 18.9% in the diquafosol and sodium hyaluronate groups, respectively, with no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Diquafosol (3%) and sodium hyaluronate (0.1%) exhibit similar efficacy in improving fluorescein staining scores of dry eye patients, whereas, diquafosol exhibits superior efficacy in improving rose bengal staining scores. Diquafosol has high clinical efficacy and is well tolerated with a good safety profile. BMJ Group 2012-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3463860/ /pubmed/22914501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301448 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Takamura, Etsuko Tsubota, Kazuo Watanabe, Hitoshi Ohashi, Yuichi A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients |
title | A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients |
title_full | A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients |
title_fullStr | A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients |
title_short | A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients |
title_sort | randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22914501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301448 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takamuraetsuko arandomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients AT tsubotakazuo arandomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients AT watanabehitoshi arandomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients AT ohashiyuichi arandomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients AT arandomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients AT takamuraetsuko randomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients AT tsubotakazuo randomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients AT watanabehitoshi randomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients AT ohashiyuichi randomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients AT randomiseddoublemaskedcomparisonstudyofdiquafosolversussodiumhyaluronateophthalmicsolutionsindryeyepatients |