Cargando…

Scaffold Library for Tissue Engineering: A Geometric Evaluation

Tissue engineering scaffold is a biological substitute that aims to restore, to maintain, or to improve tissue functions. Currently available manufacturing technology, that is, additive manufacturing is essentially applied to fabricate the scaffold according to the predefined computer aided design (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chantarapanich, Nattapon, Puttawibul, Puttisak, Sucharitpwatskul, Sedthawatt, Jeamwatthanachai, Pongnarin, Inglam, Samroeng, Sitthiseripratip, Kriskrai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23056147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/407805
_version_ 1782245352237170688
author Chantarapanich, Nattapon
Puttawibul, Puttisak
Sucharitpwatskul, Sedthawatt
Jeamwatthanachai, Pongnarin
Inglam, Samroeng
Sitthiseripratip, Kriskrai
author_facet Chantarapanich, Nattapon
Puttawibul, Puttisak
Sucharitpwatskul, Sedthawatt
Jeamwatthanachai, Pongnarin
Inglam, Samroeng
Sitthiseripratip, Kriskrai
author_sort Chantarapanich, Nattapon
collection PubMed
description Tissue engineering scaffold is a biological substitute that aims to restore, to maintain, or to improve tissue functions. Currently available manufacturing technology, that is, additive manufacturing is essentially applied to fabricate the scaffold according to the predefined computer aided design (CAD) model. To develop scaffold CAD libraries, the polyhedrons could be used in the scaffold libraries development. In this present study, one hundred and nineteen polyhedron models were evaluated according to the established criteria. The proposed criteria included considerations on geometry, manufacturing feasibility, and mechanical strength of these polyhedrons. CAD and finite element (FE) method were employed as tools in evaluation. The result of evaluation revealed that the close-cellular scaffold included truncated octahedron, rhombicuboctahedron, and rhombitruncated cuboctahedron. In addition, the suitable polyhedrons for using as open-cellular scaffold libraries included hexahedron, truncated octahedron, truncated hexahedron, cuboctahedron, rhombicuboctahedron, and rhombitruncated cuboctahedron. However, not all pore size to beam thickness ratios (PO : BT) were good for making the open-cellular scaffold. The PO : BT ratio of each library, generating the enclosed pore inside the scaffold, was excluded to avoid the impossibility of material removal after the fabrication. The close-cellular libraries presented the constant porosity which is irrespective to the different pore sizes. The relationship between PO : BT ratio and porosity of open-cellular scaffold libraries was displayed in the form of Logistic Power function. The possibility of merging two different types of libraries to produce the composite structure was geometrically evaluated in terms of the intersection index and was mechanically evaluated by means of FE analysis to observe the stress level. The couples of polyhedrons presenting low intersection index and high stress level were excluded. Good couples for producing the reinforced scaffold were hexahedron-truncated hexahedron and cuboctahedron-rhombitruncated cuboctahedron.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3463988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34639882012-10-10 Scaffold Library for Tissue Engineering: A Geometric Evaluation Chantarapanich, Nattapon Puttawibul, Puttisak Sucharitpwatskul, Sedthawatt Jeamwatthanachai, Pongnarin Inglam, Samroeng Sitthiseripratip, Kriskrai Comput Math Methods Med Research Article Tissue engineering scaffold is a biological substitute that aims to restore, to maintain, or to improve tissue functions. Currently available manufacturing technology, that is, additive manufacturing is essentially applied to fabricate the scaffold according to the predefined computer aided design (CAD) model. To develop scaffold CAD libraries, the polyhedrons could be used in the scaffold libraries development. In this present study, one hundred and nineteen polyhedron models were evaluated according to the established criteria. The proposed criteria included considerations on geometry, manufacturing feasibility, and mechanical strength of these polyhedrons. CAD and finite element (FE) method were employed as tools in evaluation. The result of evaluation revealed that the close-cellular scaffold included truncated octahedron, rhombicuboctahedron, and rhombitruncated cuboctahedron. In addition, the suitable polyhedrons for using as open-cellular scaffold libraries included hexahedron, truncated octahedron, truncated hexahedron, cuboctahedron, rhombicuboctahedron, and rhombitruncated cuboctahedron. However, not all pore size to beam thickness ratios (PO : BT) were good for making the open-cellular scaffold. The PO : BT ratio of each library, generating the enclosed pore inside the scaffold, was excluded to avoid the impossibility of material removal after the fabrication. The close-cellular libraries presented the constant porosity which is irrespective to the different pore sizes. The relationship between PO : BT ratio and porosity of open-cellular scaffold libraries was displayed in the form of Logistic Power function. The possibility of merging two different types of libraries to produce the composite structure was geometrically evaluated in terms of the intersection index and was mechanically evaluated by means of FE analysis to observe the stress level. The couples of polyhedrons presenting low intersection index and high stress level were excluded. Good couples for producing the reinforced scaffold were hexahedron-truncated hexahedron and cuboctahedron-rhombitruncated cuboctahedron. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3463988/ /pubmed/23056147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/407805 Text en Copyright © 2012 Nattapon Chantarapanich et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chantarapanich, Nattapon
Puttawibul, Puttisak
Sucharitpwatskul, Sedthawatt
Jeamwatthanachai, Pongnarin
Inglam, Samroeng
Sitthiseripratip, Kriskrai
Scaffold Library for Tissue Engineering: A Geometric Evaluation
title Scaffold Library for Tissue Engineering: A Geometric Evaluation
title_full Scaffold Library for Tissue Engineering: A Geometric Evaluation
title_fullStr Scaffold Library for Tissue Engineering: A Geometric Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Scaffold Library for Tissue Engineering: A Geometric Evaluation
title_short Scaffold Library for Tissue Engineering: A Geometric Evaluation
title_sort scaffold library for tissue engineering: a geometric evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23056147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/407805
work_keys_str_mv AT chantarapanichnattapon scaffoldlibraryfortissueengineeringageometricevaluation
AT puttawibulputtisak scaffoldlibraryfortissueengineeringageometricevaluation
AT sucharitpwatskulsedthawatt scaffoldlibraryfortissueengineeringageometricevaluation
AT jeamwatthanachaipongnarin scaffoldlibraryfortissueengineeringageometricevaluation
AT inglamsamroeng scaffoldlibraryfortissueengineeringageometricevaluation
AT sitthiseripratipkriskrai scaffoldlibraryfortissueengineeringageometricevaluation