Cargando…
Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol
BACKGROUND: Immediate access to patients’ complete health records via electronic databases could improve healthcare and facilitate health research. However, the possible benefits of a national electronic health records (EHR) system must be balanced against public concerns about data security and per...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22621621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-40 |
_version_ | 1782245378536505344 |
---|---|
author | Luchenski, Serena Balasanthiran, Anjali Marston, Cicely Sasaki, Kaori Majeed, Azeem Bell, Derek Reed, Julie E |
author_facet | Luchenski, Serena Balasanthiran, Anjali Marston, Cicely Sasaki, Kaori Majeed, Azeem Bell, Derek Reed, Julie E |
author_sort | Luchenski, Serena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Immediate access to patients’ complete health records via electronic databases could improve healthcare and facilitate health research. However, the possible benefits of a national electronic health records (EHR) system must be balanced against public concerns about data security and personal privacy. Successful development of EHR requires better understanding of the views of the public and those most affected by EHR: users of the National Health Service. This study aims to explore the correlation between personal healthcare experience (including number of healthcare contacts and number and type of longer term conditions) and views relating to development of EHR for healthcare, health services planning and policy and health research. METHODS/DESIGN: A multi-site cross-sectional self-complete questionnaire designed and piloted for use in waiting rooms was administered to patients from randomly selected outpatients’ clinics at a university teaching hospital (431 beds) and general practice surgeries from the four primary care trusts within the catchment area of the hospital. All patients entering the selected outpatients clinics and general practice surgeries were invited to take part in the survey during August-September 2011. Statistical analyses will be conducted using descriptive techniques to present respondents’ overall views about electronic health records and logistic regression to explore associations between these views and participants’ personal circumstances, experiences, sociodemographics and more specific views about electronic health records. DISCUSSION: The study design and implementation were successful, resulting in unusually high response rates and overall recruitment (85.5%, 5336 responses). Rates for face-to-face recruitment in previous work are variable, but typically lower (mean 76.7%, SD 20). We discuss details of how we collected the data to provide insight into how we obtained this unusually high response rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3464182 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34641822012-10-05 Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol Luchenski, Serena Balasanthiran, Anjali Marston, Cicely Sasaki, Kaori Majeed, Azeem Bell, Derek Reed, Julie E BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Immediate access to patients’ complete health records via electronic databases could improve healthcare and facilitate health research. However, the possible benefits of a national electronic health records (EHR) system must be balanced against public concerns about data security and personal privacy. Successful development of EHR requires better understanding of the views of the public and those most affected by EHR: users of the National Health Service. This study aims to explore the correlation between personal healthcare experience (including number of healthcare contacts and number and type of longer term conditions) and views relating to development of EHR for healthcare, health services planning and policy and health research. METHODS/DESIGN: A multi-site cross-sectional self-complete questionnaire designed and piloted for use in waiting rooms was administered to patients from randomly selected outpatients’ clinics at a university teaching hospital (431 beds) and general practice surgeries from the four primary care trusts within the catchment area of the hospital. All patients entering the selected outpatients clinics and general practice surgeries were invited to take part in the survey during August-September 2011. Statistical analyses will be conducted using descriptive techniques to present respondents’ overall views about electronic health records and logistic regression to explore associations between these views and participants’ personal circumstances, experiences, sociodemographics and more specific views about electronic health records. DISCUSSION: The study design and implementation were successful, resulting in unusually high response rates and overall recruitment (85.5%, 5336 responses). Rates for face-to-face recruitment in previous work are variable, but typically lower (mean 76.7%, SD 20). We discuss details of how we collected the data to provide insight into how we obtained this unusually high response rate. BioMed Central 2012-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3464182/ /pubmed/22621621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-40 Text en Copyright ©2012 Luchenski et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Luchenski, Serena Balasanthiran, Anjali Marston, Cicely Sasaki, Kaori Majeed, Azeem Bell, Derek Reed, Julie E Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol |
title | Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol |
title_full | Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol |
title_fullStr | Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol |
title_short | Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol |
title_sort | survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: study protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22621621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-40 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luchenskiserena surveyofpatientandpublicperceptionsofelectronichealthrecordsforhealthcarepolicyandresearchstudyprotocol AT balasanthirananjali surveyofpatientandpublicperceptionsofelectronichealthrecordsforhealthcarepolicyandresearchstudyprotocol AT marstoncicely surveyofpatientandpublicperceptionsofelectronichealthrecordsforhealthcarepolicyandresearchstudyprotocol AT sasakikaori surveyofpatientandpublicperceptionsofelectronichealthrecordsforhealthcarepolicyandresearchstudyprotocol AT majeedazeem surveyofpatientandpublicperceptionsofelectronichealthrecordsforhealthcarepolicyandresearchstudyprotocol AT bellderek surveyofpatientandpublicperceptionsofelectronichealthrecordsforhealthcarepolicyandresearchstudyprotocol AT reedjuliee surveyofpatientandpublicperceptionsofelectronichealthrecordsforhealthcarepolicyandresearchstudyprotocol |