Cargando…

Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol

BACKGROUND: Immediate access to patients’ complete health records via electronic databases could improve healthcare and facilitate health research. However, the possible benefits of a national electronic health records (EHR) system must be balanced against public concerns about data security and per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luchenski, Serena, Balasanthiran, Anjali, Marston, Cicely, Sasaki, Kaori, Majeed, Azeem, Bell, Derek, Reed, Julie E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22621621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-40
_version_ 1782245378536505344
author Luchenski, Serena
Balasanthiran, Anjali
Marston, Cicely
Sasaki, Kaori
Majeed, Azeem
Bell, Derek
Reed, Julie E
author_facet Luchenski, Serena
Balasanthiran, Anjali
Marston, Cicely
Sasaki, Kaori
Majeed, Azeem
Bell, Derek
Reed, Julie E
author_sort Luchenski, Serena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immediate access to patients’ complete health records via electronic databases could improve healthcare and facilitate health research. However, the possible benefits of a national electronic health records (EHR) system must be balanced against public concerns about data security and personal privacy. Successful development of EHR requires better understanding of the views of the public and those most affected by EHR: users of the National Health Service. This study aims to explore the correlation between personal healthcare experience (including number of healthcare contacts and number and type of longer term conditions) and views relating to development of EHR for healthcare, health services planning and policy and health research. METHODS/DESIGN: A multi-site cross-sectional self-complete questionnaire designed and piloted for use in waiting rooms was administered to patients from randomly selected outpatients’ clinics at a university teaching hospital (431 beds) and general practice surgeries from the four primary care trusts within the catchment area of the hospital. All patients entering the selected outpatients clinics and general practice surgeries were invited to take part in the survey during August-September 2011. Statistical analyses will be conducted using descriptive techniques to present respondents’ overall views about electronic health records and logistic regression to explore associations between these views and participants’ personal circumstances, experiences, sociodemographics and more specific views about electronic health records. DISCUSSION: The study design and implementation were successful, resulting in unusually high response rates and overall recruitment (85.5%, 5336 responses). Rates for face-to-face recruitment in previous work are variable, but typically lower (mean 76.7%, SD 20). We discuss details of how we collected the data to provide insight into how we obtained this unusually high response rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3464182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34641822012-10-05 Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol Luchenski, Serena Balasanthiran, Anjali Marston, Cicely Sasaki, Kaori Majeed, Azeem Bell, Derek Reed, Julie E BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Immediate access to patients’ complete health records via electronic databases could improve healthcare and facilitate health research. However, the possible benefits of a national electronic health records (EHR) system must be balanced against public concerns about data security and personal privacy. Successful development of EHR requires better understanding of the views of the public and those most affected by EHR: users of the National Health Service. This study aims to explore the correlation between personal healthcare experience (including number of healthcare contacts and number and type of longer term conditions) and views relating to development of EHR for healthcare, health services planning and policy and health research. METHODS/DESIGN: A multi-site cross-sectional self-complete questionnaire designed and piloted for use in waiting rooms was administered to patients from randomly selected outpatients’ clinics at a university teaching hospital (431 beds) and general practice surgeries from the four primary care trusts within the catchment area of the hospital. All patients entering the selected outpatients clinics and general practice surgeries were invited to take part in the survey during August-September 2011. Statistical analyses will be conducted using descriptive techniques to present respondents’ overall views about electronic health records and logistic regression to explore associations between these views and participants’ personal circumstances, experiences, sociodemographics and more specific views about electronic health records. DISCUSSION: The study design and implementation were successful, resulting in unusually high response rates and overall recruitment (85.5%, 5336 responses). Rates for face-to-face recruitment in previous work are variable, but typically lower (mean 76.7%, SD 20). We discuss details of how we collected the data to provide insight into how we obtained this unusually high response rate. BioMed Central 2012-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3464182/ /pubmed/22621621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-40 Text en Copyright ©2012 Luchenski et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Luchenski, Serena
Balasanthiran, Anjali
Marston, Cicely
Sasaki, Kaori
Majeed, Azeem
Bell, Derek
Reed, Julie E
Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol
title Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol
title_full Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol
title_fullStr Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol
title_short Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol
title_sort survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22621621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-40
work_keys_str_mv AT luchenskiserena surveyofpatientandpublicperceptionsofelectronichealthrecordsforhealthcarepolicyandresearchstudyprotocol
AT balasanthirananjali surveyofpatientandpublicperceptionsofelectronichealthrecordsforhealthcarepolicyandresearchstudyprotocol
AT marstoncicely surveyofpatientandpublicperceptionsofelectronichealthrecordsforhealthcarepolicyandresearchstudyprotocol
AT sasakikaori surveyofpatientandpublicperceptionsofelectronichealthrecordsforhealthcarepolicyandresearchstudyprotocol
AT majeedazeem surveyofpatientandpublicperceptionsofelectronichealthrecordsforhealthcarepolicyandresearchstudyprotocol
AT bellderek surveyofpatientandpublicperceptionsofelectronichealthrecordsforhealthcarepolicyandresearchstudyprotocol
AT reedjuliee surveyofpatientandpublicperceptionsofelectronichealthrecordsforhealthcarepolicyandresearchstudyprotocol