Cargando…
Refining developmental coordination disorder subtyping with multivariate statistical methods
BACKGROUND: With a large number of potentially relevant clinical indicators penalization and ensemble learning methods are thought to provide better predictive performance than usual linear predictors. However, little is known about how they perform in clinical studies where few cases are available....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22834855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-107 |
_version_ | 1782245444986863616 |
---|---|
author | Lalanne, Christophe Falissard, Bruno Golse, Bernard Vaivre-Douret, Laurence |
author_facet | Lalanne, Christophe Falissard, Bruno Golse, Bernard Vaivre-Douret, Laurence |
author_sort | Lalanne, Christophe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With a large number of potentially relevant clinical indicators penalization and ensemble learning methods are thought to provide better predictive performance than usual linear predictors. However, little is known about how they perform in clinical studies where few cases are available. We used Random Forests and Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis to select the most salient impairments in Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) and assess patients similarity. METHODS: We considered a wide-range testing battery for various neuropsychological and visuo-motor impairments which aimed at characterizing subtypes of DCD in a sample of 63 children. Classifiers were optimized on a training sample, and they were used subsequently to rank the 49 items according to a permuted measure of variable importance. In addition, subtyping consistency was assessed with cluster analysis on the training sample. Clustering fitness and predictive accuracy were evaluated on the validation sample. RESULTS: Both classifiers yielded a relevant subset of items impairments that altogether accounted for a sharp discrimination between three DCD subtypes: ideomotor, visual-spatial and constructional, and mixt dyspraxia. The main impairments that were found to characterize the three subtypes were: digital perception, imitations of gestures, digital praxia, lego blocks, visual spatial structuration, visual motor integration, coordination between upper and lower limbs. Classification accuracy was above 90% for all classifiers, and clustering fitness was found to be satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Random Forests and Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis are useful tools to extract salient features from a large pool of correlated binary predictors, but also provide a way to assess individuals proximities in a reduced factor space. Less than 15 neuro-visual, neuro-psychomotor and neuro-psychological tests might be required to provide a sensitive and specific diagnostic of DCD on this particular sample, and isolated markers might be used to refine our understanding of DCD in future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3464628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34646282012-10-05 Refining developmental coordination disorder subtyping with multivariate statistical methods Lalanne, Christophe Falissard, Bruno Golse, Bernard Vaivre-Douret, Laurence BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: With a large number of potentially relevant clinical indicators penalization and ensemble learning methods are thought to provide better predictive performance than usual linear predictors. However, little is known about how they perform in clinical studies where few cases are available. We used Random Forests and Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis to select the most salient impairments in Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) and assess patients similarity. METHODS: We considered a wide-range testing battery for various neuropsychological and visuo-motor impairments which aimed at characterizing subtypes of DCD in a sample of 63 children. Classifiers were optimized on a training sample, and they were used subsequently to rank the 49 items according to a permuted measure of variable importance. In addition, subtyping consistency was assessed with cluster analysis on the training sample. Clustering fitness and predictive accuracy were evaluated on the validation sample. RESULTS: Both classifiers yielded a relevant subset of items impairments that altogether accounted for a sharp discrimination between three DCD subtypes: ideomotor, visual-spatial and constructional, and mixt dyspraxia. The main impairments that were found to characterize the three subtypes were: digital perception, imitations of gestures, digital praxia, lego blocks, visual spatial structuration, visual motor integration, coordination between upper and lower limbs. Classification accuracy was above 90% for all classifiers, and clustering fitness was found to be satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Random Forests and Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis are useful tools to extract salient features from a large pool of correlated binary predictors, but also provide a way to assess individuals proximities in a reduced factor space. Less than 15 neuro-visual, neuro-psychomotor and neuro-psychological tests might be required to provide a sensitive and specific diagnostic of DCD on this particular sample, and isolated markers might be used to refine our understanding of DCD in future studies. BioMed Central 2012-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3464628/ /pubmed/22834855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-107 Text en Copyright ©2012 Lalanne et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lalanne, Christophe Falissard, Bruno Golse, Bernard Vaivre-Douret, Laurence Refining developmental coordination disorder subtyping with multivariate statistical methods |
title | Refining developmental coordination disorder subtyping with multivariate statistical methods |
title_full | Refining developmental coordination disorder subtyping with multivariate statistical methods |
title_fullStr | Refining developmental coordination disorder subtyping with multivariate statistical methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Refining developmental coordination disorder subtyping with multivariate statistical methods |
title_short | Refining developmental coordination disorder subtyping with multivariate statistical methods |
title_sort | refining developmental coordination disorder subtyping with multivariate statistical methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22834855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-107 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lalannechristophe refiningdevelopmentalcoordinationdisordersubtypingwithmultivariatestatisticalmethods AT falissardbruno refiningdevelopmentalcoordinationdisordersubtypingwithmultivariatestatisticalmethods AT golsebernard refiningdevelopmentalcoordinationdisordersubtypingwithmultivariatestatisticalmethods AT vaivredouretlaurence refiningdevelopmentalcoordinationdisordersubtypingwithmultivariatestatisticalmethods |