Cargando…

Risk factors for contacts between wild boar and outdoor pigs in Switzerland and investigations on potential Brucella suis spill-over

BACKGROUND: Due to the parallel increase of the number of free-ranging wild boar and domestic pigs reared outdoor, the risk that they interact has become higher. Contacts with wild boar can be the origin of disease outbreaks in pigs, as it has been documented for brucellosis in some European countri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Natacha, Abril, Carlos, Thomann, Andreas, Grosclaude, Eleonore, Doherr, Marcus G, Boujon, Patrick, Ryser-Degiorgis, Marie-Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22817843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-116
_version_ 1782245461857402880
author Wu, Natacha
Abril, Carlos
Thomann, Andreas
Grosclaude, Eleonore
Doherr, Marcus G
Boujon, Patrick
Ryser-Degiorgis, Marie-Pierre
author_facet Wu, Natacha
Abril, Carlos
Thomann, Andreas
Grosclaude, Eleonore
Doherr, Marcus G
Boujon, Patrick
Ryser-Degiorgis, Marie-Pierre
author_sort Wu, Natacha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to the parallel increase of the number of free-ranging wild boar and domestic pigs reared outdoor, the risk that they interact has become higher. Contacts with wild boar can be the origin of disease outbreaks in pigs, as it has been documented for brucellosis in some European countries. This study aimed at quantifying the occurrence of contacts between wild boar and outdoor domestic pigs in Switzerland, and identifying risk factors for these contacts. Furthermore, exposed pigs were tested for pathogen spill-over, taking Brucella suis as an example because B. suis is widespread in Swiss wild boar while domestic pigs are officially free of brucellosis. RESULTS: Thirty-one percent of the game-wardens and 25% of the pig owners participating to a country-wide questionnaire survey reported contacts, including approaches of wild boar outside the fence, intrusions, and mating. Seventeen piggeries (5%) reported the birth of cross-bred animals. Risk factors for contacts identified by a uni- and multivariable logistic regression approach were: distance between pigs enclosure and houses, proximity of a forest, electric fences, and fences ≤ 60 cm. Pigs of the Mangalitza breed were most at risk for mating with wild boar (births of cross-bred animals). Blood and tissues of 218 outdoor pigs from 13 piggeries were tested for an infection with Brucella suis, using rose bengal test, complement fixation test, and an IS711-based real-time PCR. One piggery with previous wild boar contacts was found infected with B. suis, however, epidemiological investigations failed to identify the direct source of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that interactions between wild boar and outdoor pigs are not uncommon, pointing at the existing risk of pathogen spill-over. Provided data on risk factors for these interactions could help the risk-based implementation of protection measures for piggeries. The documentation of a brucellosis outbreak in pigs despite the freedom-of-disease status underlines the importance of improving pathogen surveillance strategies and increasing disease awareness of farmers and veterinary practitioners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3464720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34647202012-10-05 Risk factors for contacts between wild boar and outdoor pigs in Switzerland and investigations on potential Brucella suis spill-over Wu, Natacha Abril, Carlos Thomann, Andreas Grosclaude, Eleonore Doherr, Marcus G Boujon, Patrick Ryser-Degiorgis, Marie-Pierre BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Due to the parallel increase of the number of free-ranging wild boar and domestic pigs reared outdoor, the risk that they interact has become higher. Contacts with wild boar can be the origin of disease outbreaks in pigs, as it has been documented for brucellosis in some European countries. This study aimed at quantifying the occurrence of contacts between wild boar and outdoor domestic pigs in Switzerland, and identifying risk factors for these contacts. Furthermore, exposed pigs were tested for pathogen spill-over, taking Brucella suis as an example because B. suis is widespread in Swiss wild boar while domestic pigs are officially free of brucellosis. RESULTS: Thirty-one percent of the game-wardens and 25% of the pig owners participating to a country-wide questionnaire survey reported contacts, including approaches of wild boar outside the fence, intrusions, and mating. Seventeen piggeries (5%) reported the birth of cross-bred animals. Risk factors for contacts identified by a uni- and multivariable logistic regression approach were: distance between pigs enclosure and houses, proximity of a forest, electric fences, and fences ≤ 60 cm. Pigs of the Mangalitza breed were most at risk for mating with wild boar (births of cross-bred animals). Blood and tissues of 218 outdoor pigs from 13 piggeries were tested for an infection with Brucella suis, using rose bengal test, complement fixation test, and an IS711-based real-time PCR. One piggery with previous wild boar contacts was found infected with B. suis, however, epidemiological investigations failed to identify the direct source of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that interactions between wild boar and outdoor pigs are not uncommon, pointing at the existing risk of pathogen spill-over. Provided data on risk factors for these interactions could help the risk-based implementation of protection measures for piggeries. The documentation of a brucellosis outbreak in pigs despite the freedom-of-disease status underlines the importance of improving pathogen surveillance strategies and increasing disease awareness of farmers and veterinary practitioners. BioMed Central 2012-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3464720/ /pubmed/22817843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-116 Text en Copyright ©2012 Wu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Natacha
Abril, Carlos
Thomann, Andreas
Grosclaude, Eleonore
Doherr, Marcus G
Boujon, Patrick
Ryser-Degiorgis, Marie-Pierre
Risk factors for contacts between wild boar and outdoor pigs in Switzerland and investigations on potential Brucella suis spill-over
title Risk factors for contacts between wild boar and outdoor pigs in Switzerland and investigations on potential Brucella suis spill-over
title_full Risk factors for contacts between wild boar and outdoor pigs in Switzerland and investigations on potential Brucella suis spill-over
title_fullStr Risk factors for contacts between wild boar and outdoor pigs in Switzerland and investigations on potential Brucella suis spill-over
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for contacts between wild boar and outdoor pigs in Switzerland and investigations on potential Brucella suis spill-over
title_short Risk factors for contacts between wild boar and outdoor pigs in Switzerland and investigations on potential Brucella suis spill-over
title_sort risk factors for contacts between wild boar and outdoor pigs in switzerland and investigations on potential brucella suis spill-over
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22817843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-116
work_keys_str_mv AT wunatacha riskfactorsforcontactsbetweenwildboarandoutdoorpigsinswitzerlandandinvestigationsonpotentialbrucellasuisspillover
AT abrilcarlos riskfactorsforcontactsbetweenwildboarandoutdoorpigsinswitzerlandandinvestigationsonpotentialbrucellasuisspillover
AT thomannandreas riskfactorsforcontactsbetweenwildboarandoutdoorpigsinswitzerlandandinvestigationsonpotentialbrucellasuisspillover
AT grosclaudeeleonore riskfactorsforcontactsbetweenwildboarandoutdoorpigsinswitzerlandandinvestigationsonpotentialbrucellasuisspillover
AT doherrmarcusg riskfactorsforcontactsbetweenwildboarandoutdoorpigsinswitzerlandandinvestigationsonpotentialbrucellasuisspillover
AT boujonpatrick riskfactorsforcontactsbetweenwildboarandoutdoorpigsinswitzerlandandinvestigationsonpotentialbrucellasuisspillover
AT ryserdegiorgismariepierre riskfactorsforcontactsbetweenwildboarandoutdoorpigsinswitzerlandandinvestigationsonpotentialbrucellasuisspillover