Cargando…
Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test CareStart pLDH Malaria (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting
BACKGROUND: The present study evaluated CareStart pLDH Malaria, a three-band rapid diagnostic test detecting Plasmodium falciparum-specific parasite lactate dehydrogenase (Pf-pLDH) and pan Plasmodium-specific pLDH (pan-pLDH) in a reference setting. METHODS: CareStart pLDH was retrospectively and pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22704733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-204 |
_version_ | 1782245479224967168 |
---|---|
author | Heutmekers, Marloes Gillet, Philippe Maltha, Jessica Scheirlinck, Annelies Cnops, Lieselotte Bottieau, Emmanuel Van Esbroeck, Marjan Jacobs, Jan |
author_facet | Heutmekers, Marloes Gillet, Philippe Maltha, Jessica Scheirlinck, Annelies Cnops, Lieselotte Bottieau, Emmanuel Van Esbroeck, Marjan Jacobs, Jan |
author_sort | Heutmekers, Marloes |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The present study evaluated CareStart pLDH Malaria, a three-band rapid diagnostic test detecting Plasmodium falciparum-specific parasite lactate dehydrogenase (Pf-pLDH) and pan Plasmodium-specific pLDH (pan-pLDH) in a reference setting. METHODS: CareStart pLDH was retrospectively and prospectively assessed with a panel of stored (n = 498) and fresh (n = 77) blood samples obtained in international travelers suspected of malaria. Both panels comprised all four Plasmodium species; the retrospective panel comprised also Plasmodium negative samples. The reference method was microscopy corrected by PCR. The prospective panel was run side-to-side with OptiMAL (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) and SDFK60 (histidine-rich protein-2 (HRP-2)/pan-pLDH). RESULTS: In the retrospective evaluation, overall sensitivity for P. falciparum samples (n = 247) was 94.7%, reaching 98.7% for parasite densities > 1,000/μl. Most false negative results occurred among samples with pure gametocytaemia (2/12, 16.7%) and at parasite densities ≤ 100/μl (7/12, 58.3%). None of the Plasmodium negative samples (n = 96) showed visible test lines. Sensitivities for Plasmodium vivax (n = 70), Plasmodium ovale (n = 69) and Plasmodium malariae (n = 16) were 74.3%, 31.9% and 25.0% respectively. Wrong species identification occurred in 10 (2.5%) samples and was mainly due to P. vivax samples reacting with the Pf-pLDH test line. Overall, Pf-pLDH test lines showed higher line intensities compared to the pan-pLDH lines (67.9% and 23.0% medium and strong line intensities for P. falciparum). In the prospective panel (77 Plasmodium-positive samples), CareStart pLDH showed higher sensitivities for P. falciparum compared to OptiMAL (p = 0.008), lower sensitivities for P. falciparum as compare to SDFK60 (although not reaching statistical significance, p = 0.08) and higher sensitivities for P. ovale compared to both OptiMAL (p = 0.03) and SDFK60 (p = 0.01). Inter-observer and test reproducibility were good to excellent. CONCLUSION: CareStart pLDH performed excellent for the detection of P. falciparum, well for P. vivax, but poor for P. ovale and P. malariae. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3464813 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34648132012-10-06 Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test CareStart pLDH Malaria (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting Heutmekers, Marloes Gillet, Philippe Maltha, Jessica Scheirlinck, Annelies Cnops, Lieselotte Bottieau, Emmanuel Van Esbroeck, Marjan Jacobs, Jan Malar J Research BACKGROUND: The present study evaluated CareStart pLDH Malaria, a three-band rapid diagnostic test detecting Plasmodium falciparum-specific parasite lactate dehydrogenase (Pf-pLDH) and pan Plasmodium-specific pLDH (pan-pLDH) in a reference setting. METHODS: CareStart pLDH was retrospectively and prospectively assessed with a panel of stored (n = 498) and fresh (n = 77) blood samples obtained in international travelers suspected of malaria. Both panels comprised all four Plasmodium species; the retrospective panel comprised also Plasmodium negative samples. The reference method was microscopy corrected by PCR. The prospective panel was run side-to-side with OptiMAL (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) and SDFK60 (histidine-rich protein-2 (HRP-2)/pan-pLDH). RESULTS: In the retrospective evaluation, overall sensitivity for P. falciparum samples (n = 247) was 94.7%, reaching 98.7% for parasite densities > 1,000/μl. Most false negative results occurred among samples with pure gametocytaemia (2/12, 16.7%) and at parasite densities ≤ 100/μl (7/12, 58.3%). None of the Plasmodium negative samples (n = 96) showed visible test lines. Sensitivities for Plasmodium vivax (n = 70), Plasmodium ovale (n = 69) and Plasmodium malariae (n = 16) were 74.3%, 31.9% and 25.0% respectively. Wrong species identification occurred in 10 (2.5%) samples and was mainly due to P. vivax samples reacting with the Pf-pLDH test line. Overall, Pf-pLDH test lines showed higher line intensities compared to the pan-pLDH lines (67.9% and 23.0% medium and strong line intensities for P. falciparum). In the prospective panel (77 Plasmodium-positive samples), CareStart pLDH showed higher sensitivities for P. falciparum compared to OptiMAL (p = 0.008), lower sensitivities for P. falciparum as compare to SDFK60 (although not reaching statistical significance, p = 0.08) and higher sensitivities for P. ovale compared to both OptiMAL (p = 0.03) and SDFK60 (p = 0.01). Inter-observer and test reproducibility were good to excellent. CONCLUSION: CareStart pLDH performed excellent for the detection of P. falciparum, well for P. vivax, but poor for P. ovale and P. malariae. BioMed Central 2012-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3464813/ /pubmed/22704733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-204 Text en Copyright ©2012 Heutmekers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Heutmekers, Marloes Gillet, Philippe Maltha, Jessica Scheirlinck, Annelies Cnops, Lieselotte Bottieau, Emmanuel Van Esbroeck, Marjan Jacobs, Jan Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test CareStart pLDH Malaria (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting |
title | Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test CareStart pLDH Malaria (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting |
title_full | Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test CareStart pLDH Malaria (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test CareStart pLDH Malaria (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test CareStart pLDH Malaria (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting |
title_short | Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test CareStart pLDH Malaria (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting |
title_sort | evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test carestart pldh malaria (pf-pldh/pan-pldh) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22704733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-204 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heutmekersmarloes evaluationoftherapiddiagnostictestcarestartpldhmalariapfpldhpanpldhforthediagnosisofmalariainareferencesetting AT gilletphilippe evaluationoftherapiddiagnostictestcarestartpldhmalariapfpldhpanpldhforthediagnosisofmalariainareferencesetting AT malthajessica evaluationoftherapiddiagnostictestcarestartpldhmalariapfpldhpanpldhforthediagnosisofmalariainareferencesetting AT scheirlinckannelies evaluationoftherapiddiagnostictestcarestartpldhmalariapfpldhpanpldhforthediagnosisofmalariainareferencesetting AT cnopslieselotte evaluationoftherapiddiagnostictestcarestartpldhmalariapfpldhpanpldhforthediagnosisofmalariainareferencesetting AT bottieauemmanuel evaluationoftherapiddiagnostictestcarestartpldhmalariapfpldhpanpldhforthediagnosisofmalariainareferencesetting AT vanesbroeckmarjan evaluationoftherapiddiagnostictestcarestartpldhmalariapfpldhpanpldhforthediagnosisofmalariainareferencesetting AT jacobsjan evaluationoftherapiddiagnostictestcarestartpldhmalariapfpldhpanpldhforthediagnosisofmalariainareferencesetting |