Cargando…
Radiotherapy dose–response analysis for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a complete response to chemotherapy
OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of different radiation doses after achievement of a complete response to chemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: Patients with stage I-IV DLBCL treated from 1995–2009 at Duke Cancer Institute who achieved a complete response to chemotherapy...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22720801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-100 |
_version_ | 1782245481388179456 |
---|---|
author | Dorth, Jennifer A Prosnitz, Leonard R Broadwater, Gloria Beaven, Anne W Kelsey, Chris R |
author_facet | Dorth, Jennifer A Prosnitz, Leonard R Broadwater, Gloria Beaven, Anne W Kelsey, Chris R |
author_sort | Dorth, Jennifer A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of different radiation doses after achievement of a complete response to chemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: Patients with stage I-IV DLBCL treated from 1995–2009 at Duke Cancer Institute who achieved a complete response to chemotherapy were reviewed. In-field control, event-free survival, and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Dose response was evaluated by grouping treated sites by delivered radiation dose. RESULTS: 105 patients were treated with RT to 214 disease sites. Chemotherapy (median 6 cycles) was R-CHOP (65%), CHOP (26%), R-CNOP (2%), or other (7%). Post-chemotherapy imaging was PET/CT (88%), gallium with CT (1%), or CT only (11%). The median RT dose was 30 Gy (range, 12–40 Gy). The median radiation dose was higher for patients with stage I-II disease compared with patients with stage III-IV disease (30 versus 24.5 Gy, p < 0.001). Five-year in-field control, event-free survival, and overall survival for all patients was 94% (95% CI: 89-99%), 84% (95% CI: 77-92%), and 91% (95% CI: 85-97%), respectively. Six patients developed an in-field recurrence at 10 sites, without a clear dose response. In-field failure was higher at sites ≥ 10 cm (14% versus 4%, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: In-field control was excellent with a combined modality approach when a complete response was achieved after chemotherapy without a clear radiation dose response. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3464871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34648712012-10-06 Radiotherapy dose–response analysis for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a complete response to chemotherapy Dorth, Jennifer A Prosnitz, Leonard R Broadwater, Gloria Beaven, Anne W Kelsey, Chris R Radiat Oncol Research OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of different radiation doses after achievement of a complete response to chemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: Patients with stage I-IV DLBCL treated from 1995–2009 at Duke Cancer Institute who achieved a complete response to chemotherapy were reviewed. In-field control, event-free survival, and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Dose response was evaluated by grouping treated sites by delivered radiation dose. RESULTS: 105 patients were treated with RT to 214 disease sites. Chemotherapy (median 6 cycles) was R-CHOP (65%), CHOP (26%), R-CNOP (2%), or other (7%). Post-chemotherapy imaging was PET/CT (88%), gallium with CT (1%), or CT only (11%). The median RT dose was 30 Gy (range, 12–40 Gy). The median radiation dose was higher for patients with stage I-II disease compared with patients with stage III-IV disease (30 versus 24.5 Gy, p < 0.001). Five-year in-field control, event-free survival, and overall survival for all patients was 94% (95% CI: 89-99%), 84% (95% CI: 77-92%), and 91% (95% CI: 85-97%), respectively. Six patients developed an in-field recurrence at 10 sites, without a clear dose response. In-field failure was higher at sites ≥ 10 cm (14% versus 4%, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: In-field control was excellent with a combined modality approach when a complete response was achieved after chemotherapy without a clear radiation dose response. BioMed Central 2012-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3464871/ /pubmed/22720801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-100 Text en Copyright ©2012 Dorth et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Dorth, Jennifer A Prosnitz, Leonard R Broadwater, Gloria Beaven, Anne W Kelsey, Chris R Radiotherapy dose–response analysis for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a complete response to chemotherapy |
title | Radiotherapy dose–response analysis for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a complete response to chemotherapy |
title_full | Radiotherapy dose–response analysis for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a complete response to chemotherapy |
title_fullStr | Radiotherapy dose–response analysis for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a complete response to chemotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiotherapy dose–response analysis for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a complete response to chemotherapy |
title_short | Radiotherapy dose–response analysis for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a complete response to chemotherapy |
title_sort | radiotherapy dose–response analysis for diffuse large b-cell lymphoma with a complete response to chemotherapy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22720801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-100 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dorthjennifera radiotherapydoseresponseanalysisfordiffuselargebcelllymphomawithacompleteresponsetochemotherapy AT prosnitzleonardr radiotherapydoseresponseanalysisfordiffuselargebcelllymphomawithacompleteresponsetochemotherapy AT broadwatergloria radiotherapydoseresponseanalysisfordiffuselargebcelllymphomawithacompleteresponsetochemotherapy AT beavenannew radiotherapydoseresponseanalysisfordiffuselargebcelllymphomawithacompleteresponsetochemotherapy AT kelseychrisr radiotherapydoseresponseanalysisfordiffuselargebcelllymphomawithacompleteresponsetochemotherapy |