Cargando…

Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Pain relief during labour is a topic of major interest in the Netherlands. Epidural analgesia is considered to be the most effective method of pain relief and recommended as first choice. However its uptake by pregnant women is limited compared to other western countries, partly as a res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freeman, Liv M, Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM, Franssen, Maureen TM, Papatsonis, Dimitri NM, Hajenius, Petra J, van Huizen, Marloes E, Bremer, Henk A, van den Akker, Eline SA, Woiski, Mallory D, Porath, Martina M, van Beek, Erik, Schuitemaker, Nico, van der Salm, Paulien CM, Fong, Bianca F, Radder, Celine, Bax, Caroline J, Sikkema, Marko, van den Akker-van Marle, M Elske, van Lith, Jan MM, Lopriore, Enrico, Uildriks, Renske J, Struys, Michel MRF, Mol, Ben Willem J, Dahan, Albert, Middeldorp, Johanna M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22748068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-63
_version_ 1782245492882669568
author Freeman, Liv M
Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM
Franssen, Maureen TM
Papatsonis, Dimitri NM
Hajenius, Petra J
van Huizen, Marloes E
Bremer, Henk A
van den Akker, Eline SA
Woiski, Mallory D
Porath, Martina M
van Beek, Erik
Schuitemaker, Nico
van der Salm, Paulien CM
Fong, Bianca F
Radder, Celine
Bax, Caroline J
Sikkema, Marko
van den Akker-van Marle, M Elske
van Lith, Jan MM
Lopriore, Enrico
Uildriks, Renske J
Struys, Michel MRF
Mol, Ben Willem J
Dahan, Albert
Middeldorp, Johanna M
author_facet Freeman, Liv M
Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM
Franssen, Maureen TM
Papatsonis, Dimitri NM
Hajenius, Petra J
van Huizen, Marloes E
Bremer, Henk A
van den Akker, Eline SA
Woiski, Mallory D
Porath, Martina M
van Beek, Erik
Schuitemaker, Nico
van der Salm, Paulien CM
Fong, Bianca F
Radder, Celine
Bax, Caroline J
Sikkema, Marko
van den Akker-van Marle, M Elske
van Lith, Jan MM
Lopriore, Enrico
Uildriks, Renske J
Struys, Michel MRF
Mol, Ben Willem J
Dahan, Albert
Middeldorp, Johanna M
author_sort Freeman, Liv M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pain relief during labour is a topic of major interest in the Netherlands. Epidural analgesia is considered to be the most effective method of pain relief and recommended as first choice. However its uptake by pregnant women is limited compared to other western countries, partly as a result of non-availability due to logistic problems. Remifentanil, a synthetic opioid, is very suitable for patient controlled analgesia. Recent studies show that epidural analgesia is superior to remifentanil patient controlled analgesia in terms of pain intensity score; however there was no difference in satisfaction with pain relief between both treatments. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study is a multicentre randomized controlled study that assesses the cost-effectiveness of remifentanil patient controlled analgesia compared to epidural analgesia. We hypothesize that remifentanil patient controlled analgesia is as effective in improving pain appreciation scores as epidural analgesia, with lower costs and easier achievement of 24 hours availability of pain relief for women in labour and efficient pain relief for those with a contraindication for epidural analgesia. Eligible women will be informed about the study and randomized before active labour has started. Women will be randomly allocated to a strategy based on epidural analgesia or on remifentanil patient controlled analgesia when they request pain relief during labour. Primary outcome is the pain appreciation score, i.e. satisfaction with pain relief. Secondary outcome parameters are costs, patient satisfaction, pain scores (pain-intensity), mode of delivery and maternal and neonatal side effects. The economic analysis will be performed from a short-term healthcare perspective. For both strategies the cost of perinatal care for mother and child, starting at the onset of labour and ending ten days after delivery, will be registered and compared. DISCUSSION: This study, considering cost effectiveness of remifentanil as first choice analgesia versus epidural analgesia, could strongly improve the care for 180.000 women, giving birth in the Netherlands yearly by giving them access to pain relief during labour, 24 hours a day. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Trial Register NTR2551, http://www.trialregister.nl
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3464937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34649372012-10-06 Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial Freeman, Liv M Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM Franssen, Maureen TM Papatsonis, Dimitri NM Hajenius, Petra J van Huizen, Marloes E Bremer, Henk A van den Akker, Eline SA Woiski, Mallory D Porath, Martina M van Beek, Erik Schuitemaker, Nico van der Salm, Paulien CM Fong, Bianca F Radder, Celine Bax, Caroline J Sikkema, Marko van den Akker-van Marle, M Elske van Lith, Jan MM Lopriore, Enrico Uildriks, Renske J Struys, Michel MRF Mol, Ben Willem J Dahan, Albert Middeldorp, Johanna M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Labor, Delivery and Postnatal Medicine BACKGROUND: Pain relief during labour is a topic of major interest in the Netherlands. Epidural analgesia is considered to be the most effective method of pain relief and recommended as first choice. However its uptake by pregnant women is limited compared to other western countries, partly as a result of non-availability due to logistic problems. Remifentanil, a synthetic opioid, is very suitable for patient controlled analgesia. Recent studies show that epidural analgesia is superior to remifentanil patient controlled analgesia in terms of pain intensity score; however there was no difference in satisfaction with pain relief between both treatments. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study is a multicentre randomized controlled study that assesses the cost-effectiveness of remifentanil patient controlled analgesia compared to epidural analgesia. We hypothesize that remifentanil patient controlled analgesia is as effective in improving pain appreciation scores as epidural analgesia, with lower costs and easier achievement of 24 hours availability of pain relief for women in labour and efficient pain relief for those with a contraindication for epidural analgesia. Eligible women will be informed about the study and randomized before active labour has started. Women will be randomly allocated to a strategy based on epidural analgesia or on remifentanil patient controlled analgesia when they request pain relief during labour. Primary outcome is the pain appreciation score, i.e. satisfaction with pain relief. Secondary outcome parameters are costs, patient satisfaction, pain scores (pain-intensity), mode of delivery and maternal and neonatal side effects. The economic analysis will be performed from a short-term healthcare perspective. For both strategies the cost of perinatal care for mother and child, starting at the onset of labour and ending ten days after delivery, will be registered and compared. DISCUSSION: This study, considering cost effectiveness of remifentanil as first choice analgesia versus epidural analgesia, could strongly improve the care for 180.000 women, giving birth in the Netherlands yearly by giving them access to pain relief during labour, 24 hours a day. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Trial Register NTR2551, http://www.trialregister.nl BioMed Central 2012-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3464937/ /pubmed/22748068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-63 Text en Copyright ©2012 Freeman et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Labor, Delivery and Postnatal Medicine
Freeman, Liv M
Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM
Franssen, Maureen TM
Papatsonis, Dimitri NM
Hajenius, Petra J
van Huizen, Marloes E
Bremer, Henk A
van den Akker, Eline SA
Woiski, Mallory D
Porath, Martina M
van Beek, Erik
Schuitemaker, Nico
van der Salm, Paulien CM
Fong, Bianca F
Radder, Celine
Bax, Caroline J
Sikkema, Marko
van den Akker-van Marle, M Elske
van Lith, Jan MM
Lopriore, Enrico
Uildriks, Renske J
Struys, Michel MRF
Mol, Ben Willem J
Dahan, Albert
Middeldorp, Johanna M
Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial
title Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_full Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_short Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_sort remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. a multicentre randomized controlled trial
topic Labor, Delivery and Postnatal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22748068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-63
work_keys_str_mv AT freemanlivm remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bloemenkampkittywm remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT franssenmaureentm remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT papatsonisdimitrinm remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hajeniuspetraj remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanhuizenmarloese remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bremerhenka remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandenakkerelinesa remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT woiskimalloryd remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT porathmartinam remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanbeekerik remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schuitemakernico remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandersalmpauliencm remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fongbiancaf remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT radderceline remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baxcarolinej remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sikkemamarko remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandenakkervanmarlemelske remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanlithjanmm remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT loprioreenrico remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT uildriksrenskej remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT struysmichelmrf remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT molbenwillemj remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dahanalbert remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT middeldorpjohannam remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial