Cargando…
Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Pain relief during labour is a topic of major interest in the Netherlands. Epidural analgesia is considered to be the most effective method of pain relief and recommended as first choice. However its uptake by pregnant women is limited compared to other western countries, partly as a res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22748068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-63 |
_version_ | 1782245492882669568 |
---|---|
author | Freeman, Liv M Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM Franssen, Maureen TM Papatsonis, Dimitri NM Hajenius, Petra J van Huizen, Marloes E Bremer, Henk A van den Akker, Eline SA Woiski, Mallory D Porath, Martina M van Beek, Erik Schuitemaker, Nico van der Salm, Paulien CM Fong, Bianca F Radder, Celine Bax, Caroline J Sikkema, Marko van den Akker-van Marle, M Elske van Lith, Jan MM Lopriore, Enrico Uildriks, Renske J Struys, Michel MRF Mol, Ben Willem J Dahan, Albert Middeldorp, Johanna M |
author_facet | Freeman, Liv M Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM Franssen, Maureen TM Papatsonis, Dimitri NM Hajenius, Petra J van Huizen, Marloes E Bremer, Henk A van den Akker, Eline SA Woiski, Mallory D Porath, Martina M van Beek, Erik Schuitemaker, Nico van der Salm, Paulien CM Fong, Bianca F Radder, Celine Bax, Caroline J Sikkema, Marko van den Akker-van Marle, M Elske van Lith, Jan MM Lopriore, Enrico Uildriks, Renske J Struys, Michel MRF Mol, Ben Willem J Dahan, Albert Middeldorp, Johanna M |
author_sort | Freeman, Liv M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pain relief during labour is a topic of major interest in the Netherlands. Epidural analgesia is considered to be the most effective method of pain relief and recommended as first choice. However its uptake by pregnant women is limited compared to other western countries, partly as a result of non-availability due to logistic problems. Remifentanil, a synthetic opioid, is very suitable for patient controlled analgesia. Recent studies show that epidural analgesia is superior to remifentanil patient controlled analgesia in terms of pain intensity score; however there was no difference in satisfaction with pain relief between both treatments. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study is a multicentre randomized controlled study that assesses the cost-effectiveness of remifentanil patient controlled analgesia compared to epidural analgesia. We hypothesize that remifentanil patient controlled analgesia is as effective in improving pain appreciation scores as epidural analgesia, with lower costs and easier achievement of 24 hours availability of pain relief for women in labour and efficient pain relief for those with a contraindication for epidural analgesia. Eligible women will be informed about the study and randomized before active labour has started. Women will be randomly allocated to a strategy based on epidural analgesia or on remifentanil patient controlled analgesia when they request pain relief during labour. Primary outcome is the pain appreciation score, i.e. satisfaction with pain relief. Secondary outcome parameters are costs, patient satisfaction, pain scores (pain-intensity), mode of delivery and maternal and neonatal side effects. The economic analysis will be performed from a short-term healthcare perspective. For both strategies the cost of perinatal care for mother and child, starting at the onset of labour and ending ten days after delivery, will be registered and compared. DISCUSSION: This study, considering cost effectiveness of remifentanil as first choice analgesia versus epidural analgesia, could strongly improve the care for 180.000 women, giving birth in the Netherlands yearly by giving them access to pain relief during labour, 24 hours a day. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Trial Register NTR2551, http://www.trialregister.nl |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3464937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34649372012-10-06 Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial Freeman, Liv M Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM Franssen, Maureen TM Papatsonis, Dimitri NM Hajenius, Petra J van Huizen, Marloes E Bremer, Henk A van den Akker, Eline SA Woiski, Mallory D Porath, Martina M van Beek, Erik Schuitemaker, Nico van der Salm, Paulien CM Fong, Bianca F Radder, Celine Bax, Caroline J Sikkema, Marko van den Akker-van Marle, M Elske van Lith, Jan MM Lopriore, Enrico Uildriks, Renske J Struys, Michel MRF Mol, Ben Willem J Dahan, Albert Middeldorp, Johanna M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Labor, Delivery and Postnatal Medicine BACKGROUND: Pain relief during labour is a topic of major interest in the Netherlands. Epidural analgesia is considered to be the most effective method of pain relief and recommended as first choice. However its uptake by pregnant women is limited compared to other western countries, partly as a result of non-availability due to logistic problems. Remifentanil, a synthetic opioid, is very suitable for patient controlled analgesia. Recent studies show that epidural analgesia is superior to remifentanil patient controlled analgesia in terms of pain intensity score; however there was no difference in satisfaction with pain relief between both treatments. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study is a multicentre randomized controlled study that assesses the cost-effectiveness of remifentanil patient controlled analgesia compared to epidural analgesia. We hypothesize that remifentanil patient controlled analgesia is as effective in improving pain appreciation scores as epidural analgesia, with lower costs and easier achievement of 24 hours availability of pain relief for women in labour and efficient pain relief for those with a contraindication for epidural analgesia. Eligible women will be informed about the study and randomized before active labour has started. Women will be randomly allocated to a strategy based on epidural analgesia or on remifentanil patient controlled analgesia when they request pain relief during labour. Primary outcome is the pain appreciation score, i.e. satisfaction with pain relief. Secondary outcome parameters are costs, patient satisfaction, pain scores (pain-intensity), mode of delivery and maternal and neonatal side effects. The economic analysis will be performed from a short-term healthcare perspective. For both strategies the cost of perinatal care for mother and child, starting at the onset of labour and ending ten days after delivery, will be registered and compared. DISCUSSION: This study, considering cost effectiveness of remifentanil as first choice analgesia versus epidural analgesia, could strongly improve the care for 180.000 women, giving birth in the Netherlands yearly by giving them access to pain relief during labour, 24 hours a day. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Trial Register NTR2551, http://www.trialregister.nl BioMed Central 2012-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3464937/ /pubmed/22748068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-63 Text en Copyright ©2012 Freeman et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Labor, Delivery and Postnatal Medicine Freeman, Liv M Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM Franssen, Maureen TM Papatsonis, Dimitri NM Hajenius, Petra J van Huizen, Marloes E Bremer, Henk A van den Akker, Eline SA Woiski, Mallory D Porath, Martina M van Beek, Erik Schuitemaker, Nico van der Salm, Paulien CM Fong, Bianca F Radder, Celine Bax, Caroline J Sikkema, Marko van den Akker-van Marle, M Elske van Lith, Jan MM Lopriore, Enrico Uildriks, Renske J Struys, Michel MRF Mol, Ben Willem J Dahan, Albert Middeldorp, Johanna M Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title | Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. a multicentre randomized controlled trial |
topic | Labor, Delivery and Postnatal Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22748068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-63 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freemanlivm remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bloemenkampkittywm remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT franssenmaureentm remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT papatsonisdimitrinm remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hajeniuspetraj remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanhuizenmarloese remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bremerhenka remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandenakkerelinesa remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT woiskimalloryd remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT porathmartinam remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanbeekerik remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schuitemakernico remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandersalmpauliencm remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fongbiancaf remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT radderceline remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT baxcarolinej remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sikkemamarko remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandenakkervanmarlemelske remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanlithjanmm remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT loprioreenrico remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT uildriksrenskej remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT struysmichelmrf remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT molbenwillemj remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dahanalbert remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT middeldorpjohannam remifentanilpatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusepiduralanalgesiainlabouramulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial |