Cargando…

A post-classical theory of enamel biomineralization… and why we need one

Enamel crystals are unique in shape, orientation and organization. They are hundreds of thousands times longer than they are wide, run parallel to each other, are oriented with respect to the ameloblast membrane at the mineralization front and are organized into rod or interrod enamel. The classical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simmer, James P, Richardson, Amelia S, Hu, Yuan-Yuan, Smith, Charles E, Ching-Chun Hu, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22996272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2012.59
_version_ 1782245498555465728
author Simmer, James P
Richardson, Amelia S
Hu, Yuan-Yuan
Smith, Charles E
Ching-Chun Hu, Jan
author_facet Simmer, James P
Richardson, Amelia S
Hu, Yuan-Yuan
Smith, Charles E
Ching-Chun Hu, Jan
author_sort Simmer, James P
collection PubMed
description Enamel crystals are unique in shape, orientation and organization. They are hundreds of thousands times longer than they are wide, run parallel to each other, are oriented with respect to the ameloblast membrane at the mineralization front and are organized into rod or interrod enamel. The classical theory of amelogenesis postulates that extracellular matrix proteins shape crystallites by specifically inhibiting ion deposition on the crystal sides, orient them by binding multiple crystallites and establish higher levels of crystal organization. Elements of the classical theory are supported in principle by in vitro studies; however, the classical theory does not explain how enamel forms in vivo. In this review, we describe how amelogenesis is highly integrated with ameloblast cell activities and how the shape, orientation and organization of enamel mineral ribbons are established by a mineralization front apparatus along the secretory surface of the ameloblast cell membrane.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3464985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34649852012-10-05 A post-classical theory of enamel biomineralization… and why we need one Simmer, James P Richardson, Amelia S Hu, Yuan-Yuan Smith, Charles E Ching-Chun Hu, Jan Int J Oral Sci Review Enamel crystals are unique in shape, orientation and organization. They are hundreds of thousands times longer than they are wide, run parallel to each other, are oriented with respect to the ameloblast membrane at the mineralization front and are organized into rod or interrod enamel. The classical theory of amelogenesis postulates that extracellular matrix proteins shape crystallites by specifically inhibiting ion deposition on the crystal sides, orient them by binding multiple crystallites and establish higher levels of crystal organization. Elements of the classical theory are supported in principle by in vitro studies; however, the classical theory does not explain how enamel forms in vivo. In this review, we describe how amelogenesis is highly integrated with ameloblast cell activities and how the shape, orientation and organization of enamel mineral ribbons are established by a mineralization front apparatus along the secretory surface of the ameloblast cell membrane. Nature Publishing Group 2012-09 2012-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3464985/ /pubmed/22996272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2012.59 Text en Copyright © 2012 West China School of Stomatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Review
Simmer, James P
Richardson, Amelia S
Hu, Yuan-Yuan
Smith, Charles E
Ching-Chun Hu, Jan
A post-classical theory of enamel biomineralization… and why we need one
title A post-classical theory of enamel biomineralization… and why we need one
title_full A post-classical theory of enamel biomineralization… and why we need one
title_fullStr A post-classical theory of enamel biomineralization… and why we need one
title_full_unstemmed A post-classical theory of enamel biomineralization… and why we need one
title_short A post-classical theory of enamel biomineralization… and why we need one
title_sort post-classical theory of enamel biomineralization… and why we need one
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3464985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22996272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2012.59
work_keys_str_mv AT simmerjamesp apostclassicaltheoryofenamelbiomineralizationandwhyweneedone
AT richardsonamelias apostclassicaltheoryofenamelbiomineralizationandwhyweneedone
AT huyuanyuan apostclassicaltheoryofenamelbiomineralizationandwhyweneedone
AT smithcharlese apostclassicaltheoryofenamelbiomineralizationandwhyweneedone
AT chingchunhujan apostclassicaltheoryofenamelbiomineralizationandwhyweneedone
AT simmerjamesp postclassicaltheoryofenamelbiomineralizationandwhyweneedone
AT richardsonamelias postclassicaltheoryofenamelbiomineralizationandwhyweneedone
AT huyuanyuan postclassicaltheoryofenamelbiomineralizationandwhyweneedone
AT smithcharlese postclassicaltheoryofenamelbiomineralizationandwhyweneedone
AT chingchunhujan postclassicaltheoryofenamelbiomineralizationandwhyweneedone