Cargando…
Accuracy of malaria rapid diagnosis test Optimal-IT® in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo
BACKGROUND: Despite some problems related to accuracy and applicability, malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), are currently considered the best option in areas with limited laboratory services for improving case management and reducing over-treatment. However, their performance must be established...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3465183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22770130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-224 |
_version_ | 1782245522087608320 |
---|---|
author | Muhindo, Hypolite Mavoko Ilombe, Gillon Meya, Ruth Mitashi, Patrick M Kutekemeni, Albert Gasigwa, Didier Lutumba, Pascal Van Geertruyden, Jean-Pierre |
author_facet | Muhindo, Hypolite Mavoko Ilombe, Gillon Meya, Ruth Mitashi, Patrick M Kutekemeni, Albert Gasigwa, Didier Lutumba, Pascal Van Geertruyden, Jean-Pierre |
author_sort | Muhindo, Hypolite Mavoko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite some problems related to accuracy and applicability, malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), are currently considered the best option in areas with limited laboratory services for improving case management and reducing over-treatment. However, their performance must be established taking into the account the particularities of each endemic area. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, the validity of Optimal-IT® and Paracheck-Pf®, respectively based on the detection of lactate dehydrogenase and histidine-rich protein-2, was assessed at primary health care level (PHC). METHODS: This was a two-stage cluster randomized survey, conducted in one health centre in 12 health zones in Kinshasa city. All patients with malaria presumptive diagnosis were eligible. Gold standard was microscopy performed by experts from the parasitology unit, Kinshasa University. RESULTS: 624 patients were enrolled. 53.4% (95% CI: 49.4-57.3) owed a bed net, obtained in 74.5% of cases (95% CI: 69.4-79.1) through community-based distribution by the National Malaria Control Programme. Microscopy expert reading confirmed 123 malaria cases (19.7%; 95% CI: 16.7-23.1). Overall sensitivity were 79.7% (95% CI: 72.4-86.8), 87.8% (95% CI: 81.9-93.6) and 86.2% (95% CI: 79.9-92.3), respectively, for Optimal-IT®, Paracheck-Pf® and microscopy performed at PHC. Specificity was 97.0% (95% CI: 95.5-98.5), 91.6% (95% CI: 89.1-94.0) and 49.1% (95% CI: 44.7-53.4). The proportion of confirmed cases seemed similar in under-fives compared to others. Any treatment prior to the current visit was a predictor for malaria (AOR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.5-3.5), but not malaria treatment (AOR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.4-1.8). Bed net ownership tended to protect against malaria (AOR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.45-0.99). CONCLUSION: Although microscopy is considered as the "gold standard" for malaria diagnosis at point of care level, this study showed that its accuracy may not always be satisfactory when performed in health centres. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3465183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34651832012-10-06 Accuracy of malaria rapid diagnosis test Optimal-IT® in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo Muhindo, Hypolite Mavoko Ilombe, Gillon Meya, Ruth Mitashi, Patrick M Kutekemeni, Albert Gasigwa, Didier Lutumba, Pascal Van Geertruyden, Jean-Pierre Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Despite some problems related to accuracy and applicability, malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), are currently considered the best option in areas with limited laboratory services for improving case management and reducing over-treatment. However, their performance must be established taking into the account the particularities of each endemic area. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, the validity of Optimal-IT® and Paracheck-Pf®, respectively based on the detection of lactate dehydrogenase and histidine-rich protein-2, was assessed at primary health care level (PHC). METHODS: This was a two-stage cluster randomized survey, conducted in one health centre in 12 health zones in Kinshasa city. All patients with malaria presumptive diagnosis were eligible. Gold standard was microscopy performed by experts from the parasitology unit, Kinshasa University. RESULTS: 624 patients were enrolled. 53.4% (95% CI: 49.4-57.3) owed a bed net, obtained in 74.5% of cases (95% CI: 69.4-79.1) through community-based distribution by the National Malaria Control Programme. Microscopy expert reading confirmed 123 malaria cases (19.7%; 95% CI: 16.7-23.1). Overall sensitivity were 79.7% (95% CI: 72.4-86.8), 87.8% (95% CI: 81.9-93.6) and 86.2% (95% CI: 79.9-92.3), respectively, for Optimal-IT®, Paracheck-Pf® and microscopy performed at PHC. Specificity was 97.0% (95% CI: 95.5-98.5), 91.6% (95% CI: 89.1-94.0) and 49.1% (95% CI: 44.7-53.4). The proportion of confirmed cases seemed similar in under-fives compared to others. Any treatment prior to the current visit was a predictor for malaria (AOR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.5-3.5), but not malaria treatment (AOR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.4-1.8). Bed net ownership tended to protect against malaria (AOR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.45-0.99). CONCLUSION: Although microscopy is considered as the "gold standard" for malaria diagnosis at point of care level, this study showed that its accuracy may not always be satisfactory when performed in health centres. BioMed Central 2012-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3465183/ /pubmed/22770130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-224 Text en Copyright ©2012 Muhindo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Muhindo, Hypolite Mavoko Ilombe, Gillon Meya, Ruth Mitashi, Patrick M Kutekemeni, Albert Gasigwa, Didier Lutumba, Pascal Van Geertruyden, Jean-Pierre Accuracy of malaria rapid diagnosis test Optimal-IT® in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo |
title | Accuracy of malaria rapid diagnosis test Optimal-IT® in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo |
title_full | Accuracy of malaria rapid diagnosis test Optimal-IT® in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of malaria rapid diagnosis test Optimal-IT® in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of malaria rapid diagnosis test Optimal-IT® in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo |
title_short | Accuracy of malaria rapid diagnosis test Optimal-IT® in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo |
title_sort | accuracy of malaria rapid diagnosis test optimal-it® in kinshasa, the democratic republic of congo |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3465183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22770130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muhindohypolitemavoko accuracyofmalariarapiddiagnosistestoptimalitinkinshasathedemocraticrepublicofcongo AT ilombegillon accuracyofmalariarapiddiagnosistestoptimalitinkinshasathedemocraticrepublicofcongo AT meyaruth accuracyofmalariarapiddiagnosistestoptimalitinkinshasathedemocraticrepublicofcongo AT mitashipatrickm accuracyofmalariarapiddiagnosistestoptimalitinkinshasathedemocraticrepublicofcongo AT kutekemenialbert accuracyofmalariarapiddiagnosistestoptimalitinkinshasathedemocraticrepublicofcongo AT gasigwadidier accuracyofmalariarapiddiagnosistestoptimalitinkinshasathedemocraticrepublicofcongo AT lutumbapascal accuracyofmalariarapiddiagnosistestoptimalitinkinshasathedemocraticrepublicofcongo AT vangeertruydenjeanpierre accuracyofmalariarapiddiagnosistestoptimalitinkinshasathedemocraticrepublicofcongo |